Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
'The man can only ride you when your back is bent': Sarah Palin rambles incoherently in Iowa after teleprompter freezes... a day after she declared an interest in 2016 run........
If you find Sarah's use of the English Language coherent, I can only wonder where either of you were educated.
Quote:
To put it lightly, Palin delivered an incredibly disjointed speech. More to the point, it was the kind of speech that made me wonder if Palin is suffering from some sort of debilitating ailment. Palin can't seem to form a coherent sentence anymore. Or could she ever? In any case, this speech crosses the line from funny to sad very quickly.
The liberals here rarely ever bother to answer the point of what's said. The majority of left wing responses on CD consist of ad hominem attacks rather than actual rebuttal points. On one hand it is frustrating, but on the other hand it is gratifying. Because while they of course consider themselves to have made a witty comeback, you know it's obvious that they just had nothing to say. Any time you make a point and get a typical leftist arrogant dismissal instead of a real response, you know you've won the argument.
There is nothing to counter here. I've heard this woman speak maybe 3 or 4 times and she makes no sense. She never completes a thought. IDK, if it is alcohol, pills or a neurological condition but I do know that she is the last person this country needs representing them. Sorry.
Sarah is a basket case. Thank God she never got to be Vice President.
They want to test welfare recipients for drugs. A better use for the drug testing is for ALL of our politicians. Especially Sarah. The people really need more say in why congress can give themselves raises and benefits without our approval. Put them all on social security and then they will find a way to fix it.
The liberals here rarely ever bother to answer the point of what's said. The majority of left wing responses on CD consist of ad hominem attacks rather than actual rebuttal points. On one hand it is frustrating, but on the other hand it is gratifying. Because while they of course consider themselves to have made a witty comeback, you know it's obvious that they just had nothing to say. Any time you make a point and get a typical leftist arrogant dismissal instead of a real response, you know you've won the argument.
Yet my post which had legitimate critique of her argument was ignored, yet the posts you describe are regularly responded to be conservatives. Why is that?
And I'll give you the benefit of the doubt here and say you just didn't see my post and I'll restate what I had said. Rather or not Palin was making a valid point or not is irrelevant; her delivery is so poor that it creates suspicion that even she doesn't actually know what she's talking about. She's against big government. That's been established. But what was her point here? It seemed vague and unorganized. It's hard to respond to a point that was constructed so poorly. Perhaps she needs to work on her delivery and become a better speaker before she can be taken seriously.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
