Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Sigh...look at the post #21. Go ahead look. deception? THATS deception. let me quote from that link:
If you aren't able to comprehend why it is, then you have serious issues.
My statement? Is provided by the Koch brothers themselves. So tell me EXACTLY how I am being deceptive, IE provide facts instead of nonsense.
I think some of these guys roll a pair of dice, and randomly choose a pre-sliced statement to paste as a response. Maybe they spin a wheel for categories: Hateful, demeaning, insulting. I'm sorry, but when I read that post I thought the exact same thing. I reread your post, then I laughed my ass off. It's really quite fascinating.
Some of us just talk about needing to return this country to its constitutional roots. The Koch brothers put their money where their mouth is. God bless them.
Seriously.....889 million dollars? And its not even 2016 yet. This next election is going to show just how much money can effect an election. And the answer may be shocking.
Because I think money can only effect a vote by about 5%. Yes that matters in some elections, but money only goes so far. At a certain point you have to be able to convince people of your platform.
Gods...I'd hate to live in a swing state. The advertisements are going to be non-stop.
I wonder how much George Soros has set aside for the Democrats in 2016. Remember greywar, it's always better to see both sides.
So how much is Soros and other rich Dems setting aside? I bet it's more. They spent huge in the election last year but didn't get much to show for it.
Indeed. Harry Reid's Senate Majority PAC, literally spent $100M+ in the election last November in a vain attempt to support incumbent senators from the Democrat party.
Here in NC, this PAC and others like it outspent the GOP 2x1 in the Kay Hagan/Tom Tillis race. Reid's PAC on some days bought up all the air time for political adverts for Hagan. This became the most expensive US Senate race in history. Yet despite what pollsters were saying, Hagan lost, not because of the money, but because of the job she did. i.e. Blindly supporting Obama.
IMO, I don't think the money makes much difference anymore. People ignore the adverts.
Seriously.....889 million dollars? And its not even 2016 yet. This next election is going to show just how much money can effect an election. And the answer may be shocking.
Because I think money can only effect a vote by about 5%. Yes that matters in some elections, but money only goes so far. At a certain point you have to be able to convince people of your platform.
Gods...I'd hate to live in a swing state. The advertisements are going to be non-stop.
conservatives at least elected conservatives love this. Bought and paid for. Citizens United which was handed to us by conservatives will not be viewed kindly by history.
conservatives at least elected conservatives love this. Bought and paid for. Citizens United which was handed to us by conservatives will not be viewed kindly by history.
Gods...I'd hate to live in a swing state. The advertisements are going to be non-stop.
Yes, I can't wait for it to be over.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
