Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-27-2015, 08:40 AM
 
Location: USA
31,033 posts, read 22,070,533 times
Reputation: 19080

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
No, $50K in 10 years is $5K in one year
Thats about right. I pay about 5k more now than I did pre-Obama care.

Quote:
Originally Posted by wjtwet View Post
But we were told it would lower the deficit and we could keep our doctors while saving the average family 2500 a year
Well, this average family payed 5k more last year.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-27-2015, 08:41 AM
 
Location: Texas
38,859 posts, read 25,535,277 times
Reputation: 24780
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
Obama said we needed to pass ACA to insure the 32 million uninsured americans.
At last count we had 41 million uninsured americans

Now gringo, you're old enough to know that 41 million - 32 million is a LOSS of 9 million, and thats even AFTER it climbed as high as 45 million.

the funny part is your link does nothing at all to dispell the statement at all.

And lets not even talk about the CBO estimate that we will NEVER get below 30 million uninsured..

Thats a new decrease of 2 million people for $2 TRILLION dollars.. SOMETIME down the road.. maybe

Proceed!!

You're tossing out lots of numbers.

Prove it.

Please.



http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/...der-obamacare/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2015, 08:47 AM
 
Location: Texas
38,859 posts, read 25,535,277 times
Reputation: 24780
Quote:
Originally Posted by LS Jaun View Post
Is that the best you can do in O's defense?
It's called perspective. It adds depth to the issue.

Obama doesn't need me to "defend" him, as you put it.

Quote:
"But, but, Bush sucked too": Dam right he did! And by the time O is done he will bankrupt us even more. At this rate we can't afford another President.
Your lack of perspective has become obvious.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2015, 08:48 AM
 
8,391 posts, read 6,296,160 times
Reputation: 2314
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
Didn't Obama state he wouldn't sign it if it cost over a trillion?
He had the CBO come in with numbers he wanted, didn't he.

CBO: Obamacare to cost $2 trillion over the next decade | WashingtonExaminer.com
Reality

The total price tag for ObamaCare’s insurance programs will be 20 percent less than expected, the government’s budget office said Monday.

The law’s insurance provisions are now expected to cost $571 billion through 2019 — a drop of about $139 billion from the government's earliest estimates five years ago, according to new estimates by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO).


Budget office lowers ObamaCare price tag by 20 percent | TheHill


This fact is being widely reported this morning in the reality based world. But in conservativeland, the ACA is more expensive than projected. SMH.


The collective conservative ability to completely ignore reality and flat out lie to themselves in this mass collective delusion about the ACA is astounding.

I have yet to read or listen to or watch one conservative who grapples with the objective facts coming out about the ACA that contains any good news.
[MOD CUT/trolling]

Last edited by Ibginnie; 01-27-2015 at 01:39 PM.. Reason: trolling again
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2015, 08:50 AM
 
Location: Fort Worth Texas
12,481 posts, read 10,221,813 times
Reputation: 2536
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iamme73 View Post
Reality

The total price tag for ObamaCare’s insurance programs will be 20 percent less than expected, the government’s budget office said Monday.

The law’s insurance provisions are now expected to cost $571 billion through 2019 — a drop of about $139 billion from the government's earliest estimates five years ago, according to new estimates by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO).


Budget office lowers ObamaCare price tag by 20 percent | TheHill


This fact is being widely reported this morning in the reality based world. But in conservativeland, the ACA is more expensive than projected. SMH.


The collective conservative ability to completely ignore reality and flat out lie to themselves in this mass collective delusion about the ACA is astounding.

I have yet to read or listen to or watch one conservative who grapples with the objective facts coming out about the ACA that contains any good news.
[MOD CUT/trolling]
Thought it was going to lower our deficit and save us all 2500 a year

Last edited by Ibginnie; 01-27-2015 at 01:40 PM.. Reason: edited quoted post
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2015, 08:53 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,101,577 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Gringo View Post
Prove what numbers? I stated the starting point, and last years total..

if you dont know what the numbers are, then why are you posting here, acting like you have a dam clue when you dont..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2015, 08:54 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,101,577 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iamme73 View Post
Reality

The total price tag for ObamaCare’s insurance programs will be 20 percent less than expected, the government’s budget office said Monday.

The law’s insurance provisions are now expected to cost $571 billion through 2019 — a drop of about $139 billion from the government's earliest estimates five years ago, according to new estimates by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO).


Budget office lowers ObamaCare price tag by 20 percent | TheHill

This fact is being widely reported this morning in the reality based world. But in conservativeland, the ACA is more expensive than projected. SMH.

The collective conservative ability to completely ignore reality and flat out lie to themselves in this mass collective delusion about the ACA is astounding.

I have yet to read or listen to or watch one conservative who grapples with the objective facts coming out about the ACA that contains any good news.

[MOD CUT/trolling]
The only way it can lower the deficit is if PEOPLE DONT GET INSURANCE AND PAY THE FINES while making it more expensive for everyone else.

Is that the new sign of success?

Last edited by Ibginnie; 01-27-2015 at 01:40 PM.. Reason: edited quoted post
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2015, 08:56 AM
 
19,573 posts, read 8,518,202 times
Reputation: 10096
It will not cost $2 trillion if the subsidies are mostly gutted out of it by the Supreme Court later this year, as is expected to happen by many close to this case on both the left and right.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2015, 08:56 AM
 
7,359 posts, read 5,462,865 times
Reputation: 3142
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
Didn't Obama state he wouldn't sign it if it cost over a trillion?
He had the CBO come in with numbers he wanted, didn't he.

CBO: Obamacare to cost $2 trillion over the next decade | WashingtonExaminer.com
Well they did a number of things, including:
1. Taking a medicare cut and counting as Obamacare funding
2. Passing a doctor payment loophole fix as a separate bill so that it wouldn't count against the Obamacare numbers
3. Calculating the cost of the first 10 years using 6 years of funding but only 4 years of benefits

So yes, the Democrats made claims that Obamacare would cost less than a trillion and would lower deficit when it in fact costs double that and increases the deficit.

They also promised that the Catholic Church would not have to pay for abortion drugs, that nobody would lose access to their current physicians or insurance, that there would be no rationing of healthcare, and that the mandate was not a tax.

They also included a provision that taxpayer funds would be used to bailout any insurance companies that lost money, issued themselves and campaign donors exemptions to the law's provisions, refused to let anybody read the legislation prior to it being voted on, accused opponents of the legislation of being against providing any healthcare at all to poor people, and used a reconciliation procedure designed for budget legislation to silence Republicans from debating the law prior to the vote.

Virtually the entire Obamacare issue was dishonest and unethical on the part of the Democrat Party.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2015, 08:56 AM
 
Location: Texas
38,859 posts, read 25,535,277 times
Reputation: 24780
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
We're talking about Obamacare costs on this thread.

I know its hard for some people to understand the cost and effect of individual programs, but please try.
OK

These "projections" on the ACA have been out there for three years. The "math" used to arrive at those figures varies, though.

https://www.google.com/webhp?tab=ww&...ost+2+trillion

Quote:
otherwise you just look like you dont know what you are talking about and changing the subject to distract from the utter failure taking place.

Since you broached the subject of utter failures...

http://www.thenews.com.pk/Todays-News-2-203012-US-wars-in-Afghanistan-Iraq-to-cost-$6-trillion

One program to benefit millions of Americans. Conservos call it bad.

The other a military failure to the detriment of all Americans. Conservos try to deflect.

How about some consistency instead of blind partisanship?

Compare and contrast.

At your leisure.

Carry on.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:16 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top