Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Here's a link to an article that explains the study in clearer terms.
Why try to spin it? The article's terms were very clear:
Quote:
"...an increase in volcanically induced coolingover the early 21st century."
So, again, I'll have to ask... What exactly do you expect the government to do about volcanically induced cooling? Pass a law against volcanoes? Good luck with that.
I already posted a link to a scientific journal article. It specifically states:
Cooling causes temperature declines, hence the repetition of "hide the decline" multiple times in the video.
I already posted a link to a scientific journal article. It specifically states:
Cooling causes temperature declines, hence the repetition of "hide the decline" multiple times in the video.
Repetition of talking points doesn't make them true. And you don't seem to understand what your own reference is telling you. But I do.
Why try to spin it? The article's terms were very clear:
So, again, I'll have to ask... What exactly do you expect the government to do about volcanically induced cooling? Pass a law against volcanoes? Good luck with that.
I'm sure that's absolutely true. What's not true is that it supports the denialist claim that temperatures aren't increasing globally. And it certainly doesn't support the denialist accusations of widespread fraud among non-denialists.
Why try to spin it? The article's terms were very clear:
So, again, I'll have to ask... What exactly do you expect the government to do about volcanically induced cooling? Pass a law against volcanoes? Good luck with that.
Okay, I see we need to take this one step at a time.
First-- do you understand that warming and cooling can occur at the same time?
This is good news.... Two-thirds of Americans say they are more likely to vote for political candidates who campaign on fighting climate change. They are less likely to vote for candidates who question or deny the science of human-caused global warming. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/31/us...oll-finds.html
what is the plan? what new tax will stop climate change? how will that tax on Americans will change and control the habits of other countries like China and India and Russia and the rest of the planet?
Democrats/liberals are full of themselves all to make themselves look smart "smart" and "important"
2005 was one of the warmest years on record, tied with 2010.
Obviously if you use it as your start point, there isn't going to be much of a warming trend.
It's also statistically insignificant.
If your limited attention span can handle it, NASA's realclimate has a good explanation for it all:
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
