Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 02-09-2015, 01:54 AM
 
17,842 posts, read 14,377,437 times
Reputation: 4113

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkeye2009 View Post


EXCEPT

1. the fossil record
Yep. Lot's of research has been done by paleo climate scientists using fossils. Are you not aware of it?
Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkeye2009 View Post
2. solar activity
Yep lot's of research has been done by climate scientists into solar activity. Are you not aware of it?
Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkeye2009 View Post
3. wobble in the eliptical orbit of the earth around the sun
Yep, the Milankovich cycles. All accounted for in climate science research. Are you not aware of that?
Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkeye2009 View Post
4. volcanic activity
Yep, lot's of research has been done on volcanic activity by climate scientists. Are you not aware of it?
Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkeye2009 View Post
5. the impact of other gases (water vapor and methane)
Yep, lot's of research has been done on the impact of other gases (water and methane) by climate scientists. Are you not aware of it?
Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkeye2009 View Post
6. the fact that temperatures have not changed at all over the last 20 years
Well that's just false, and a rather silly statement to make.
Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkeye2009 View Post
................................ just a few things.
Yes, it's called climate science. Apparently you're not aware of it?
Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkeye2009 View Post
Unlike YOU, I actually-

1. have an advanced degree in science

2. have published extensively in the scientific literature

3. have formal training in bench science

4. have taken courses in statistics to understand the statistical validity of data

5. have taught at major universities

6. have edited papers for the scientific literature

7. understand the cornerstone of science- refuting the null hypothesis.
So what? If you have no training or expertise in any of the fields of climate science and you are unaware of even the basic science involved or any of the research (which you have just proven) then why should anyone take your uninformed opinions on this topic seriously?

Last edited by Ibginnie; 02-09-2015 at 09:40 AM.. Reason: reply to deleted content

 
Old 02-09-2015, 02:12 AM
 
17,842 posts, read 14,377,437 times
Reputation: 4113
Quote:
Originally Posted by Icy Tea View Post
I think we've got enough evidence to begin to look into criminal conspiracy charges against those supporting global warming and measures and government policy aimed at combatting it. Some like Obama will claim stupidity but those like Al Gore who have made millions in the scam may face prison.
Such a shame that the facts are just not on the side of your conspiracy theory.
 
Old 02-09-2015, 02:28 AM
 
17,842 posts, read 14,377,437 times
Reputation: 4113
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbohm View Post
that may be correct IF you only take the last 150 years into account. but if you look at the last 2 million years(actually 65 million years, but i wont confuse you too much) you will note that according to the geological record there has been a general COOLING trend. for instance this interglacial period is ten degrees cooler than the previous interglacial, well outside the margin of scientific error.
That's not exactly true. Some areas of the globe were warmer and some areas of the globe were cooler during the last interglacial. And do you know where the earth was in the Milankovitch cycles during the past interglacial compared to the present time? If you want to gain some understanding of earth's past climates and the relevance to the present, try watching a lecture from the 2009 American Geophysical Union (AGU) conference by Professor Richard Alley.




Richard Alley: "The Biggest Control Knob: Carbon Dioxide in Earth's Climate History"

- AGU 2009 conference

Last edited by Ceist; 02-09-2015 at 03:01 AM..
 
Old 02-09-2015, 03:19 AM
 
17,842 posts, read 14,377,437 times
Reputation: 4113
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrapperJohn View Post
I just read the data from NOAA and the IPCC reports. They have pretty little graphs showing the temps 10F warmer. In fact, their pretty graphs show long-term oscillations of high and lower temps in short-term cycles over the long-term downward trend.


You can debate the meaning and cause of those cycles, but if you discount the existence or validity of the data you're a true cultist.
Can you please give a link to the NOAA website page and the chapter and page number from the IPCC AR5 report that says global average temperatures were 10 degrees higher during the last interglacial than the present? Because I can't find anything that says that. If you just read them, it shouldn't be too much of a bother.
 
Old 02-09-2015, 03:29 AM
 
Location: Central Ohio
10,832 posts, read 14,927,894 times
Reputation: 16582
Quote:
Originally Posted by PullMyFinger View Post
I agree that Global Warming has become a religion for many.
It has become so politicised it can't be real.

Thanks Al Gore you scamming crook!
 
Old 02-09-2015, 03:33 AM
 
17,842 posts, read 14,377,437 times
Reputation: 4113
Quote:
Originally Posted by LauraC View Post
Global warming is all about following the money. You have to look at who gains by it.
It's actually about the scientific evidence. You have to look who gains by denying that evidence.
 
Old 02-09-2015, 03:59 AM
 
19,573 posts, read 8,513,185 times
Reputation: 10096
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanspeur View Post
I'm beginning to think that deniers are the real alarmists... We have a carbon tax here, and corporation taxes, business taxes and personal taxes have all decreased since the carbon tax came into effect in 2008....The net corporate tax rate I pay is 11%....What do you pay?
Actually, it is the alarmists that are the real deniers, as you people relentlessly deny anything that does not conform to your talking points on this issue. Apparently you think that makes your presentation stronger, but in fact it is just the opposite. It is like seeing reviews for a product on the manufacturer's website that are 100% glowing testimonials, 100% of the time, without a single word of dissent.

It does not take a genius to realize propaganda when you encounter it.
 
Old 02-09-2015, 04:29 AM
 
4,983 posts, read 3,289,096 times
Reputation: 2739
Nothing worse than Anthropogenic Global Warming denier deniers.
 
Old 02-09-2015, 06:17 AM
 
30,058 posts, read 18,652,475 times
Reputation: 20860
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spartacus713 View Post
Actually, it is the alarmists that are the real deniers, as you people relentlessly deny anything that does not conform to your talking points on this issue. Apparently you think that makes your presentation stronger, but in fact it is just the opposite. It is like seeing reviews for a product on the manufacturer's website that are 100% glowing testimonials, 100% of the time, without a single word of dissent.

It does not take a genius to realize propaganda when you encounter it.

Well spoken. In a cult, of course, all information and data which threatens the core beliefs of the cult will be summarily rejected.

Why? In actual science, new data and information is welcomed. In a cult, any contrary information is villified, derided, and rejected without thought.

Make no mistake, AGW is the enemy of valid science.
 
Old 02-09-2015, 06:44 AM
 
11,086 posts, read 8,539,703 times
Reputation: 6392
Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkeye2009 View Post
Well spoken. In a cult, of course, all information and data which threatens the core beliefs of the cult will be summarily rejected.

Why? In actual science, new data and information is welcomed. In a cult, any contrary information is villified, derided, and rejected without thought.

Make no mistake, AGW is the enemy of valid science.
Some make their living off the fraud.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:01 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top