Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It was really hot in the 80's and part of the 90' so they pointed worthless data to add up to this.
That is AGW in a nutshell
Weren't you claiming the earth's surface temperature comes from the earth's core and not the sun? How's that "theory" working out for you? Have you figured out how you can account for the temperatures being so different between the equator and poles and day and night yet?
Ok, guys. I think I have it figured out now. When it's hot outside, it's because of global warming or climate change. When it's cold outside and record lows are happening, it's just weather. Does that pretty much sum it up liberals?
Actually, this is what the nonbrain dead are referring to when they talk about warming.
As scientists, it is not our role to tell people what they should do or must believe about the rising threat of climate change. But we consider it to be our responsibility as professionals to ensure, to the best of our ability, that people understand what we know: human-caused climate change is happening, we face risks of abrupt, unpredictable and potentially irreversible changes, and responding now will lower the risk and cost of taking action. American Association for the Advancement of Science
Which has been soundly debunked how many times now? Yet you still keep posting it?
You don't even know what homogenization is and why it's necessary so the data is valid. If a weather station is moved to a new location or new technology is used etc, the data needs to be adjusted for the new location/housing/technology otherwise it's useless. Yet some hack journalist called Booker from a tabloid thinks it's all a nefarious plot by evil scientists. Please. Apparently he also thinks asbestos is perfectly safe and has advised his readers not to bother with precautions. He's also an anti-vaxxer The guy is not only a complete idiot, he's a dangerous idiot.
conspiracynoun con·spir·a·cy \kən-ˈspir-ə-sē\ : a secret plan made by two or more people to do something that is harmful or illegal
How often do you believe that humans work together towards an end that they do not want others to know about, that is arguably harmful to someone in some way? Is it:
A. Constantly and in large numbers (More than a thousand groups of people conspiring at any one time)
B. Frequently, but in not very large numbers (Less than a thousand groups of people conspiring at any one time)
C. Occasionally, with significant gaps of time existing when there are NO conspiracies occurring anywhere on the planet Earth.
D. Never
{Hint: The Answer is A. People do this all this time}
I actually present science. You present science disinformation and attacks on scientists by the tabloid press and science denying conspiracy blogs. Congrats! You win the Booker prize. It's made of asbestos. No need for gloves or a mask - it's perfectly safe- according to Booker.
You present denials. One after another, straight up, and almost certainly more than anyone else on this website, far and away.
Since you are denying that you a serial denier, let's keep an eye out for that, shall we?
No. Just facts to debunk the false accusations and ignorance you copy and paste from your hero science 'expert' Booker the hack tabloid journalist.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
