Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Remember them? How we invaded Iraq to prevent Hussein from getting WMD to terrorists? And then there weren't any? Well, there were. I saw a similar NYT story back in Dec. or so, and now this.
'Through the C.I.A.’s purchases, General Zahner said, hundreds of weapons with potential use for terrorists were quietly taken off the market. “This was a timely and effective initiative by our national intelligence partners that negated the use of these unique munitions,” he said.'
Although the Times story is couched in language emphasizing our failure to properly warn and protect our troops, there is no doubt what they were to be protected from was active and dangerous chemical weapons.
I don't recall the frantic call to war having to do with unfireable munition left over from the Iran-Iraq war, but perhaps my memory is playing tricks on me?
Hillary,Jay RockyFella & John Kerry all were for a rush to WAR but not to fund it...Democrats wishy-washy laundry service now hiring illegals,transexuals & sheeple.
There were no WMD's nor yellow cake, it was all a made up lie to Congress and the American people. To those who constantly say: but but democrats voted for it too, I say that they were lied to just like we were. The Bush Administration were a bunch liars and criminals. They got away with the slaughter of over 4000 Americans and Republicans continue to cheer about it. It is sickening.
There were no WMD's nor yellow cake, it was all a made up lie to Congress and the American people. To those who constantly say: but but democrats voted for it too, I say that they were lied to just like we were. The Bush Administration were a bunch liars and criminals. They got away with the slaughter of over 4000 Americans and Republicans continue to cheer about it. It is sickening.
What about all of the Democrats telling us Iraq had WMDs PRIOR to Bush being elected?
Remember them? How we invaded Iraq to prevent Hussein from getting WMD to terrorists? And then there weren't any? Well, there were. I saw a similar NYT story back in Dec. or so, and now this.
'Through the C.I.A.’s purchases, General Zahner said, hundreds of weapons with potential use for terrorists were quietly taken off the market. “This was a timely and effective initiative by our national intelligence partners that negated the use of these unique munitions,” he said.'
Although the Times story is couched in language emphasizing our failure to properly warn and protect our troops, there is no doubt what they were to be protected from was active and dangerous chemical weapons.
Looks like W was wrongly accused.
Gee, if Saddam had WMD, you would think he would have used them against the US when we invaded Iraq. If not then, then when?
Hillary,Jay RockyFella & John Kerry all were for a rush to WAR but not to fund it...Democrats wishy-washy laundry service now hiring illegals,transexuals & sheeple.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
