Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
...he EXPANDS the US military role in Afghanistan.
...he orders the US military to bomb ISIS for months now.
...he authorizes military training assistance and special operations support to anti-ISIS fighters in Iraq.
...his administration pulls together a 60+ national alliance to coordinate against ISIS.
...he RAMPS UP the drone strikes on high-value targets, killing a lot more than the Bush administration.
...his administration green-lights the assassination of Osama Bin Laden.
...terrorists around the world hate him and threaten to kill him.
Ok, some of you conservatives who have been saying this for years really have to explain this one to me. "Obama is a Muslim sympathizer..." "Obama wants to see the US vanquished..." "Obama makes excuses for the terrorists..." blah blah blah
Do the actions above suggest an individual who is trying to help the extremists win over the USA?
You can call the guy maybe lousy at his job. You can question the effectiveness of some of his policies. You can say some of his executive orders go to far. But to claim he has an agenda of actively trying to help the enemy? You must be on crack to believe something so stupid when the evidence to the contrary is both obvious and numerous.
Why do certain conservatives keep repeating things like this that are obviously completely irrational nonsense?
Someone explain to me why I keep hearing how Obama is such a "terrorist sympathizer" when...
The explanation is not complex.
Many, many right wingers are still in disbelief that Obama has won two elections by wide margins. Their angry, irrational reaction is to resort to childish name-calling.
Like I always say when we start seeing Christians self-detonating their suicide vests screeming "Jesus Saves" we will have as much to worry about them as Radical Islam.
You Apologist live in a word where Hindus plowed two planes into the twins towers and Sikhs are running around cutting off peoples heads.
...he EXPANDS the US military role in Afghanistan.
...he orders the US military to bomb ISIS for months now.
...he authorizes military training assistance and special operations support to anti-ISIS fighters in Iraq.
...his administration pulls together a 60+ national alliance to coordinate against ISIS.
...he RAMPS UP the drone strikes on high-value targets, killing a lot more than the Bush administration.
...his administration green-lights the assassination of Osama Bin Laden.
...terrorists around the world hate him and threaten to kill him.
Ok, some of you conservatives who have been saying this for years really have to explain this one to me. "Obama is a Muslim sympathizer..." "Obama wants to see the US vanquished..." "Obama makes excuses for the terrorists..." blah blah blah
Do the actions above suggest an individual who is trying to help the extremists win over the USA?
You can call the guy maybe lousy at his job. You can question the effectiveness of some of his policies. You can say some of his executive orders go to far. But to claim he has an agenda of actively trying to help the enemy? You must be on crack to believe something so stupid when the evidence to the contrary is both obvious and numerous.
Why do certain conservatives keep repeating things like this that are obviously completely irrational nonsense?
The idiot in the WH does not act swiftly or decisively. He dithers around hoping the problem will go away until events overcome him. Then when he does act, it's too little too late.
Many, many right wingers are still in disbelief that Obama has won two elections by wide margins. Their angry, irrational reaction is to resort to childish name-calling.
That's all there is to it.
And many many liberals still think that 1% is a wide margin giving their president a mandate to do whatever he wants, in spite of serious beatings in House an Senate elections.
Location: On the "Left Coast", somewhere in "the Land of Fruits & Nuts"
8,852 posts, read 10,454,406 times
Reputation: 6670
Quote:
Originally Posted by Haakon
And many many liberals still think that 1% is a wide margin giving their president a mandate to do whatever he wants, in spite of serious beatings in House an Senate elections.
He sure won by more than the last guy, who needed the Supremes to decide (and look where that got us…)?!
And BTW, exactly what have said 'beatings' in the House and Senate produced so far?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Someone explain to me why I keep hearing how Obama is such a "terrorist sympathizer" when...
