Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-22-2015, 06:23 AM
 
78,408 posts, read 60,593,823 times
Reputation: 49691

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2e1m5a View Post
There are many corporate lackeys, useful idiots, bots and straight paid shills; it's hard to differentiate...


But if someone is against improving the lives of their fellow American-they are one of the above.
Or educated.

I'm not against indexing it and it is time for an increase....but you guys and your "living wage" stuff are hillarious since you are politically blind lemmings that have been told to focus on the wage which is just the equilibrium between worker supply and worker demand.

See, the war on science continues with people that deny that supply and demand exist.

We import massive amounts of labor supply into the country via illegal immigration so that makes it easy to find dish-washers, hotel room cleaners etc. which suppresses lower-wage jobs pay. That and we NAFTA'd away most of our manufacturing over seas.

Geee, lots more workers and fewer jobs.....waiiiiiiit for it......waaaaaaaaaaaiiiiiit for it.

<Genius moment>

The problem must be the PAY! We just have to PAY people more!

Sorry charlie, your political minders have lied to you because they want that latino vote and are lying to you so you keep voting for them despite them being the same corporatist hacks as the republicans.

Oh, and every democratic presidential ticket since Clinton (who signed it) has had a NAFTA signatory on it.

They've successfully diverted the jobs\poverty issue by making it about minimum wage. It's not.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-22-2015, 06:28 AM
 
Location: NE Ohio
30,419 posts, read 20,306,967 times
Reputation: 8958
For the same reason that a business cannot charge more than a product or service is worth; i.e., more than the market will bear, an employee cannot expect to be paid more than his skills and knowledge are worth to any employer. Value for value is the rule. If government tries to violate this principle, in the end, the job market for the lower skilled worker will dry up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2015, 07:24 AM
 
Location: Philadelphia
11,998 posts, read 12,935,751 times
Reputation: 8365
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimRom View Post
Exactly how does devaluing the dollar benefit us all? I'm dying to know.
If you are so concerned about "Devaluing the dollar" why don't you care about the TRILLIONS created out of thin air and given to the richest 1% of our population through quantitative easing?

Why do people NEVER complain about made up money given to rich people?

HYPOCRITES
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2015, 08:05 AM
 
Location: Jacksonville, FL
11,143 posts, read 10,711,121 times
Reputation: 9799
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2e1m5a View Post
If you are so concerned about "Devaluing the dollar" why don't you care about the TRILLIONS created out of thin air and given to the richest 1% of our population through quantitative easing?

Why do people NEVER complain about made up money given to rich people?

HYPOCRITES
I am against it, actually. The entire QE propping up of the stock market is a crock. Why do you assume that the two issues are mutually exclusive?

Look, you can argue for an increase in minimum wage all you want. However, there are no facts to back up those arguments. At no time since the 1930's, when minimum wage was introduced, has an increase in the minimum wage led to a substantial long-term improvement in the economic position of minimum wage earners. The reason behind this is simple, and I have written it out in several posts on several previous threads on the minimum wage. What it comes down to is that when you raise the minimum wage, the market adjusts. This means that jobs which currently pay 10% over minimum wage will, in the long run, continue to pay 10% over minimum wage - assuming that the increase doesn't drive their profit down to such a low point that it is no longer feasible to stay open, in which case those jobs will disappear much like the manufacturing jobs have disappeared over the years. Along with the adjustment in the labor market, there will be an adjustment in the finished product market. Companies do not set their price point on products to be affordable to minimum wage earners, because minimum wage earners make up a tiny percentage of consumers. Products are priced to be affordable to the median wage earner, because that encompasses a larger portion of consumers. So, raising the minimum wage will result in exactly what it has resulted in before, i.e. a temporary improvement in the lifestyle of minimum wage earners followed by an adjustment in wages and prices which will result in minimum wage earners once again being unable to afford 52" televisions, luxury cars, iphones, name brand clothing, and all those other things that people who have worked their way up the economic ladder either through education or experience can afford.

The long and the short of it is that if you want to improve the economic position of minimum wage earners, focus on programs that make obtaining an education or a skill set that is marketable to employers easier. The only way that minimum wage earners are going to improve their lifestyle is to find employment that pays more than minimum wage. No amount of minimum wage adjustment or economic voodoo is going to change this simple fact of life.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2015, 09:46 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,006 posts, read 44,824,472 times
Reputation: 13709
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2e1m5a View Post
If you are so concerned about "Devaluing the dollar" why don't you care about the TRILLIONS created out of thin air and given to the richest 1% of our population through quantitative easing?
One of the biggest beneficiaries of QE has been the $24 trillion pension/retirement investment sector, not just the top 1%.

Retirement Question 4 | EBRI

Get a clue, and stop parroting the manipulatively deceptive class warfare propaganda talking points you've been spoon-fed. Everyone who contributes to or benefits from an IRA, 401K, pension fund (public employee, union, or private sector), mutual fund, annuity, or whole life insurance policy, etc., has benefitted from QE, not just 1%-ers.

How anyone fails to connect the dots on how so very many Americans' retirement plans (pensions, IRAs/401Ks, annuities, etc.) absolutely depend on investments doing well is beyond me. Don't people have critical thinking skills anymore?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2015, 09:55 AM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,180,801 times
Reputation: 7875
Quote:
Originally Posted by whogo View Post
If the minimum wage was zero do you think businesses paying that would find workers?
They would probably find someone willing to work for almost nothing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2015, 10:17 AM
 
Location: Philadelphia
11,998 posts, read 12,935,751 times
Reputation: 8365
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
One of the biggest beneficiaries of QE has been the $24 trillion pension/retirement investment sector, not just the top 1%.

Retirement Question 4 | EBRI

Get a clue, and stop parroting the manipulatively deceptive class warfare propaganda talking points you've been spoon-fed. Everyone who contributes to or benefits from an IRA, 401K, pension fund (public employee, union, or private sector), mutual fund, annuity, or whole life insurance policy, etc., has benefitted from QE, not just 1%-ers.

How anyone fails to connect the dots on how so very many Americans' retirement plans (pensions, IRAs/401Ks, annuities, etc.) absolutely depend on investments doing well is beyond me. Don't people have critical thinking skills anymore?
Tomorrow is never promised. Why should only the global elite see the rewards and fruits of our labor in the present?
QE devalues our dollar and is a hidden tax on the working people. It's purpose is only to protect the hierarchy of our financial system and the corrupt institutions that control it.

They get cold hard cash to spend, invest and grow their wealth in the here and now and we get promises, IOUs and wealth on paper? Sounds fair.

Thanks for your concern-but I'd MUCH rather just take the money and invest/save for retirement myself then to be entangled with our inherently greedy and deceitful financial system .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2015, 10:50 AM
 
Location: Philadelphia
11,998 posts, read 12,935,751 times
Reputation: 8365
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mathguy View Post
Or educated.

I'm not against indexing it and it is time for an increase....but you guys and your "living wage" stuff are hillarious since you are politically blind lemmings that have been told to focus on the wage which is just the equilibrium between worker supply and worker demand.

See, the war on science continues with people that deny that supply and demand exist.

We import massive amounts of labor supply into the country via illegal immigration so that makes it easy to find dish-washers, hotel room cleaners etc. which suppresses lower-wage jobs pay. That and we NAFTA'd away most of our manufacturing over seas.

Geee, lots more workers and fewer jobs.....waiiiiiiit for it......waaaaaaaaaaaiiiiiit for it.

<Genius moment>

The problem must be the PAY! We just have to PAY people more!

Sorry charlie, your political minders have lied to you because they want that latino vote and are lying to you so you keep voting for them despite them being the same corporatist hacks as the republicans.

Oh, and every democratic presidential ticket since Clinton (who signed it) has had a NAFTA signatory on it.

They've successfully diverted the jobs\poverty issue by making it about minimum wage. It's not.
It's not about minimum wage for me.

It's about the fact that of the 100 largest economies in the World today there are more nationless corporations then entire nations of people. Our Government has been hijacked-and nationless corporations pay a cheap price for the kind of access they have to the largest consumer group on the planet.

Who do illegal immigrants benefit? Again-the nation-less corporations that are able to outsource labor as cheap as possible, avoid taxes and sell products to us as expensively as they can. They are not invested in our country and our society-they will find new consumers as our Middle Class further deteriorates.

One day you will see the danger in allowing these corporations with no allegience to our country or people to become bigger and bigger as Governments around the world become obsolete.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2015, 11:00 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,006 posts, read 44,824,472 times
Reputation: 13709
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2e1m5a View Post
Tomorrow is never promised. Why should only the global elite see the rewards and fruits of our labor in the present?
Why should millions of American retirees get their pensions and retirement account savings in the present?

Quote:
Thanks for your concern-but I'd MUCH rather just take the money and invest/save for retirement myself then to be entangled with our inherently greedy and deceitful financial system .
How do you plan on investing it "yourself?" Do you have a seat on the NYSE or NASDAQ?

Tens of millions of Americans just like you are part of that $24 trillion pension/retirement investment sector. How do you not know that?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2015, 11:08 AM
 
Location: Philadelphia
11,998 posts, read 12,935,751 times
Reputation: 8365
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Why should millions of American retirees get their pensions and retirement account savings in the present?

How do you plan on investing it "yourself?" Do you have a seat on the NYSE or NASDAQ?

Tens of millions of Americans just like you are part of that $24 trillion pension/retirement investment sector. How do you not know that?
I invest in land/real estate-not the potential earnings/profitability of corporations in a system I'd like to see reformed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:58 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top