Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 03-01-2015, 10:52 PM
 
Location: Arizona
13,778 posts, read 9,661,538 times
Reputation: 7485

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2tall View Post
Im reading the atfs book. the actual text has been posted several times in previous posts in this thread
So, what's your point?

 
Old 03-01-2015, 11:02 PM
 
Location: Lost in Montana *recalculating*...
19,758 posts, read 22,661,296 times
Reputation: 24910
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2tall View Post
Im reading the atfs book. the actual text has been posted several times in previous posts in this thread


Rub of the mill .223 target ammo can penetrate level ii armor.
More than likely not in a short handgun configuration. It may not possess the same capability as M855, however that would be something to investigate. Do you have any source of evidence? I read the ATF report and their findings were pretty damned detailed.
 
Old 03-01-2015, 11:40 PM
 
Location: Itinerant
8,278 posts, read 6,274,484 times
Reputation: 6681
Quote:
Originally Posted by mohawkx View Post
The actual law is this one. Reagan Signs Ban on Armor-Piercing 'Cop-Killer' Bullets - Los Angeles Times Other than that,
I have no idea. I'm certainly not defending BATFE. If you've read my posts, you'd see that. I've been negatively affected by the ban and bans on other calibers I regularly shoot.
You're stating the same thing. I'm presenting what was added to the USC because of the passage of the LEO Protection Act.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mohawkx View Post
My thoughts and conclusions on the matter are that the original LEOPA bill signed by Reagan was not very well thought out, as are many spontaneous gun prohibitions. They are rushed into law by an upwelling of emotion. Usually over some incident.
When the law was envisioned, it was to protect the police wearing Level 2 body armor.
Manufacturers were producing special rounds for pistols that defeated vests. Everybody wanted some. Police Depts. freaked.
Nobody envisioned at the time that someone would create a pistol out of a AKM or an AK74, or an AR15. and work around the law. Never underestimate a kitchen table machinist.
As soon as these products became available on the market as pistols, accordingly the pistols, or the ammunition they used were illegal when used together, according to the letter of the law. Which is something BATFE is very thorough about.

To a degree, we screwed ourselves, up to a point. It would have been better to declare pistols in those rifle calibers as SBRs than ban the ammo. Then we'd still have the ammo in all those calibers that have been banned, plus we'd have AR pistols as tax stamped, SBRs. But the NRA, and all the rabid 2nd people would have screamed bloody, constitutional murder. Well ammo was the easy way for BATFE to enforce the law, which a republican congress passed, I might add, instead of having to fight the NRA.

The only reason my dog is in this thread is because the usual suspects are trying to pin the whole mess on the President. I know the laws, I know the history and I know BATFE and President Obama has nothing to do with it.

So, here we are.
Everything you said is fine, except for one small point. BATFE do not have any grounds to ban M855, sure the SBR workaround by making a pistol out of a rifle is coming home to bite us in the hindquarters. However that said if this is permitted to move forwards without the authority of law, then BATFE will do it again (and they're already well known for skating the thin line in a number of areas). If BATFE want M855 banned because they consider it AP, that's fine, but they need to ensure that they alter the law so that they have the ability to do so, and that is not in their hands, but the hands of Congress.
__________________
My mod posts will always be in red.
The RulesInfractions & DeletionsWho's the moderator? • FAQ • What is a "Personal Attack" • What is "Trolling" • Guidelines for copyrighted material.
 
Old 03-01-2015, 11:45 PM
 
Location: Lost in Montana *recalculating*...
19,758 posts, read 22,661,296 times
Reputation: 24910
That's the fear- that the law was written to encompass not written as to specifically identify. It is going to be interesting to see how the interpretation is made.

In any event, one would hope the sportsmans groups and the NRA might make a thoughtful case to fight it. However I'm kinda jaded these days on just whose interests are put first- us shooters or industry. Depending on how this plays out we could see another sustained price gouging on ammo.

I really hate to sound that way, but I do have some doubts.
 
Old 03-01-2015, 11:54 PM
 
Location: somewhere in the woods
16,880 posts, read 15,196,989 times
Reputation: 5240
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert_J View Post
While most can just stock up on M855, I can't. MS law forbids the possession of ammo banned at the federal level.


luckily for me, i live in a free state, one where they do not look kindly at federal abuses.
 
Old 03-02-2015, 06:00 AM
 
Location: DC
6,848 posts, read 7,992,465 times
Reputation: 3572
Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkeye2009 View Post
The fascist in chief has threatened new "executive actions" (why not- there is no republican opposition to anything he does) to ban .223 bullets.

Interestingly, beyond the .22, .223 is the most common rifle cartridge in the US. The main focus is on ballistic tip bullets, which are widely used by target shooters.

Meanwhile, the republicans stand by and do nothing, as usual.


Obama to ban bullets by executive action, threatens top-selling AR-15 rifle | WashingtonExaminer.com#!
It's actually just implementation of a 1968 law about armor piercing ammunition. It only affect full metal jacket ammunition which is not very useful for hunting.
 
Old 03-02-2015, 06:04 AM
 
30,065 posts, read 18,663,011 times
Reputation: 20882
Quote:
Originally Posted by DCforever View Post
It's actually just implementation of a 1968 law about armor piercing ammunition. It only affect full metal jacket ammunition which is not very useful for hunting.
Really?

That is what is use for coyotes and hogs.
 
Old 03-02-2015, 07:20 AM
 
Location: MS
4,395 posts, read 4,911,481 times
Reputation: 1564
Quote:
Originally Posted by DCforever View Post
It's actually just implementation of a 1968 law about armor piercing ammunition. It only affect full metal jacket ammunition which is not very useful for hunting.
Then why did it take them so long to get around to doing this? AR-15 pistols have been on the market since the 1990s. M855 has been on the market about as long. Could it be that we are winding down the wars and the military will dump their surplus M855 on the market like they have done in the past? Is the current regime afraid of having an extra billion rounds of ammo being sold at cut-rate prices?
 
Old 03-02-2015, 07:34 AM
 
Location: MS
4,395 posts, read 4,911,481 times
Reputation: 1564
Quote:
Originally Posted by Threerun View Post
That all depends on whose book are you reading. The way I understand it MilSpec for the ammo requires it penetrate 1/8" thick steel at X meters (I think 600). In the military definition this is not 'armor piercing', it's anti-personnel.

However when ATF views it, the round (M855) is capable of defeating class II protective armor, and now can be used in a commercially available handgun. The combination of those two makes the M855 round potentially illegal according to the Law. MilSpec does not usurp the Law.
But AR-15 pistols have been around for almost 20 years.
 
Old 03-02-2015, 07:40 AM
 
Location: Cape Cod
24,490 posts, read 17,226,594 times
Reputation: 35783
So what will the dictator Obama decide that he doesn't like next? in the name of protecting us?

I think it should be cell phones, they hurt and kill more people than AR15's and the .223 do.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:26 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top