Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Federal laws in regards to handling archiving of emails are the same, regardless of private email servers, or federal. We dont know if she complied with their backup standards or not.
I'm sure she followed the same rules Lois Lerner did
Federal laws in regards to handling archiving of emails are the same, regardless of private email servers, or federal. We dont know if she complied with their backup standards or not.
She has not complied with those standards, she has concealed emails from NARA. You do not get that she does not get to decide which records gets put into record.
"But she didnt conceal it. in fact she used it as the SOLE email service."
Now YOU are implicating the White House and Obama himself.
When hillary sent SENSITIVE and OFFICIAL emails to Obama, or anyone in the White house, NOBODY NOTICED IN 4 YEARS THAT NONE OF HER EMAILS WERE FROM .GOV.
The WH has admitted that Obama's POLICY was that ONLY official email be used for OFFICIAL business.
Do you think not ONE email was sent about Benghazi or any off the other hot spots in her 4 years?
So, HOW did she communicate with them?
of course I'm implying the White House and Obama knew. She has already stated she only had one email account and never setup a federal one. If she is to email Obama, and one would assume she has several times, Obama would have known she wasnt using a federal email account.
The issue for me isnt so much that she didnt use a government email account, it was that so many people clearly knew it, and no one cared.
if you establish a policy which says you must use a .gov account, and someone isnt, then clearly the "boss", must demand it take place.
The lack of enforcing policy, is far more of an issue than her running her own server.
Since 2009, NARA's regulations have stated that "Agencies that allow employees to send and receive official electronic mail messages using a system not operated by the agency must ensure that Federal records sent or received on such systems are preserved in the appropriate agency record keeping system."
I think its abundantly clear to most people who can read she did not persevere records in the State Department record keeping system, she kept them in her own record keeping system where she and apparently her staff is the sole discretionary authority. I can not possibly believe you think a personal email server is a "State Department record keeping system".
She has not complied with those standards, she has concealed emails from NARA. You do not get that she does not get to decide which records gets put into record.
Federal records of emails arent required until the end of 2016
I think its abundantly clear to most people who can read she did not persevere records in the State Department record keeping system, she kept them in her own record keeping system.
yes, she kept them on her own email servers, but you have NO IDEA if she backed them up and complied with federal standards..
Federal records of emails arent required until the end of 2016
(I wonder if the date is "coincidential")
NARA contratdicts you:
Quote:
Since 2009, NARA's regulations have stated that "Agencies that allow employees to send and receive official electronic mail messages using a system not operated by the agency must ensure that Federal records sent or received on such systems are preserved in the appropriate agency record keeping system."
With the issuance of the Managing Government Records Directive (M-12-18), Goal 1.2, agencies are required to manage both permanent and temporary email records in an accessible electronic format by December 31, 2016.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
