Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-07-2015, 08:45 AM
 
Location: Calgary, AB
3,401 posts, read 2,283,757 times
Reputation: 1072

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Driller1 View Post
If I have to drug test to make my living.......IMO.....welfare recipients should do the same for their money.
Not violating the rights of others by subjecting them to unreasonable search and seizure takes precedence over making you feel good.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-07-2015, 08:46 AM
 
24,832 posts, read 37,329,809 times
Reputation: 11538
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seabass Inna Bun View Post
Not violating the rights of others by subjecting them to unreasonable search and seizure takes precedence over making you feel good.
Tell that to our insurance carrier......and the DOT.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2015, 08:51 AM
 
79,913 posts, read 44,167,332 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by Driller1 View Post
Tell that to our insurance carrier......and the DOT.
It can be noted above what I think about drug testing where I work. There is no one argument that covers everything here. There must be very compelling reasons for the courts to allow drug testing. Absolutely no testing is as short sighted as those who argue for testing of people who are not a risk and have shown no reason to be tested.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2015, 08:53 AM
 
Location: Calgary, AB
3,401 posts, read 2,283,757 times
Reputation: 1072
Why? They're not here whining about how poor people should be subjected to unreasonable search and seizure so you feel better, you are.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2015, 08:56 AM
 
24,832 posts, read 37,329,809 times
Reputation: 11538
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seabass Inna Bun View Post
Why? They're not here whining about how poor people should be subjected to unreasonable search and seizure so you feel better, you are.
"Whining"????

I have to take the tests too.....it is just a fact of life.......something some of us have to do to make a living.

Perhaps if those "poor people" could pass the drug screens they would not be poor.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2015, 09:03 AM
 
79,913 posts, read 44,167,332 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by Driller1 View Post
"Whining"????

I have to take the tests too.....it is just a fact of life.......something some of us have to do to make a living.

Perhaps if those "poor people" could pass the drug screens they would not be poor.
Perhaps you would be cool with gun registration then. After all, it's possible that a crime or two might get solved.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2015, 09:09 AM
 
24,832 posts, read 37,329,809 times
Reputation: 11538
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
Perhaps you would be cool with gun registration then. After all, it's possible that a crime or two might get solved.
I would.

All of our hand guns are registered.........so is we had to register rifles.....we would.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2015, 09:45 AM
 
13,417 posts, read 9,941,794 times
Reputation: 14346
Quote:
Originally Posted by Driller1 View Post
The fact you want to wait until some thing happens.........then fire the worker.
I didn't say that either.

I said, if a person is performing poorly then you fire them (or get to the bottom of what's going on, whatever. My point was not firing them per se, but that the employer has options regarding poorly performing employees, regardless of the cause). I did not say "wait until something happens".

In dangerous work environments there should be adequate supervision. I do not think that penalizing a person who has smoked pot on the weekend and absolving yourself of responsibility because another employee passed the drug test but is distracted by something not substance related is the right tactic either. There are legal deterrents that should discourage employees from putting others in harms way already in place. If you hire people that are that stupid as to ignore this at their own peril, then you need to be a bit smarter about who you hire. Likewise, if you have employees who are struggling with substance abuse issues then you have an obligation to direct them to help, legally.

Drug testing does not ensure accidents won't occur. Paying proper attention to your employees, making sure they are adequately trained and have respect for their fellow's safety would be a more effective strategy, IMO.

But what we have now is a culture where many people, regardless of whether they're in a position where they can cause harm or not, are drug tested on a regular basis. Why? Reeks of intrusion and control freakery to me.

Employers can already fire you if you aren't doing your job, and if you are, then what business is it of theirs what you do outside of the workplace, and long as you aren't throwing up on your clients or otherwise reflecting poorly on your employer?

For the sake of the illusion of safety we are giving up too many civil liberties.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2015, 09:55 AM
 
24,832 posts, read 37,329,809 times
Reputation: 11538
Quote:
Originally Posted by FinsterRufus View Post
I didn't say that either.

I said, if a person is performing poorly then you fire them (or get to the bottom of what's going on, whatever. My point was not firing them per se, but that the employer has options regarding poorly performing employees, regardless of the cause). I did not say "wait until something happens".

In dangerous work environments there should be adequate supervision. I do not think that penalizing a person who has smoked pot on the weekend and absolving yourself of responsibility because another employee passed the drug test but is distracted by something not substance related is the right tactic either. There are legal deterrents that should discourage employees from putting others in harms way already in place. If you hire people that are that stupid as to ignore this at their own peril, then you need to be a bit smarter about who you hire. Likewise, if you have employees who are struggling with substance abuse issues then you have an obligation to direct them to help, legally.

Drug testing does not ensure accidents won't occur. Paying proper attention to your employees, making sure they are adequately trained and have respect for their fellow's safety would be a more effective strategy, IMO.

But what we have now is a culture where many people, regardless of whether they're in a position where they can cause harm or not, are drug tested on a regular basis. Why? Reeks of intrusion and control freakery to me.

Employers can already fire you if you aren't doing your job, and if you are, then what business is it of theirs what you do outside of the workplace, and long as you aren't throwing up on your clients or otherwise reflecting poorly on your employer?

For the sake of the illusion of safety we are giving up too many civil liberties.
The DOT also asks people to drug test.........do you think that is wrong???
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2015, 09:55 AM
 
13,417 posts, read 9,941,794 times
Reputation: 14346
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
When we are drug tested we are also tested for alcohol. It doesn't have to be illegal to get you fired.



We do have programs for that. Mental health care is a part of our health package. You can go to your supervisor and tell them you are having issues and they will get you help, not fire you. Supervision has to go through training to spot changes in people also.



I understand the argument about being found with a drug in your system from days ago not currently affecting your ability to do your job. I support the legalization of pot. Someone is going to have to come up with a better testing system before most of us will work with someone that fails a test though as far as technology is. Develop a better system and I'm on board.
I'm pretty much with you. I think it's great that the supervisors have training to keep an eye on people's well being. I think this is a much better strategy. After all people will only fail a drug test if they happen to be drugged that day or close to it, unless it's pot or something that is no longer potent but is still detectable, which us also quite useless practically speaking. Behavioral patterns are a much better indicator of all sorts of problems that could cause someone to be homicidally or grievously negligent, and I fully support programs that would help people get through things as opposed to canning them, to a reasonable extent of course.

It's really all about money and litigation and little to do with actual people's safety and well being.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:47 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top