Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
In early 1998, some of the biggest fossil fuel companies in the world were hatching a plan to hijack the science of human-caused global warming......In a memo the plan boldly declared its goal would be to convince “a majority of the American public” that “significant uncertainties exist in climate science”.
In early 1998, some of the biggest fossil fuel companies in the world were hatching a plan to hijack the science of human-caused global warming......In a memo the plan boldly declared its goal would be to convince “a majority of the American public” that “significant uncertainties exist in climate science”.
What you are proposing is a straight up conspiracy theory. You do realize that, right?
But unlike your evil world domination plot involving the international corruption of all climate science so that the economy can be ruined and Al Gore can control our lives, this one is actually plausible.
What you are proposing is a straight up conspiracy theory. You do realize that, right?
Of course I do.....Big tobacco did the exact same thing, and as a matter of fact some of the same people and organizations that were involved in attempting to discredit the science involving the harm smoking does are now trying to discredit climate science.....Then there is Christopher Booker, a so called climate change skeptic who to this day still claims that asbestos is harmless, and evolution is nonsense....
Of course...Bi gbacco did the exact same thing, and as a matter of fact some of the same people and organizations that were involved in attempting to discredit the science involving the harm smoking does are now trying to discredit climate science.....Then there is Christopher Booker, a so called climate change skeptic who to this day still claims that asbestos is harmless, and evolution is nonsense....
Do you hold the global warmers to the same standard of science? I kept it at global warming because shifting to climate change inherently allows for a moving target, thus not the same standard. I have lived on the water since the predictions really kicked off and I can still stand in the same place in my yard and not get wet.
Of course I do.....Big tobacco did the exact same thing, and as a matter of fact some of the same people and organizations that were involved in attempting to discredit the science involving the harm smoking does are now trying to discredit climate science.....Then there is Christopher Booker, a so called climate change skeptic who to this day still claims that asbestos is harmless, and evolution is nonsense....
The corporate oil/auto industry/chem/banking that you shill for have invested literally billions annually to create a media that will only produce a certain type of propaganda for them and has created a cottage industry of attacking anyone who dares question the theories you espouse. It's a nice trick, but it's just a trick. The billionaires you shill for are no different than the billionaires you think you're opposing. No different than the non-thinkers who believe the GOP is righteous, but the Dems are evil. Or vice versa. They'll all just elite billionaires jockey for trillions in profits....and you're not.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
