Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-19-2015, 11:18 AM
 
25,619 posts, read 36,697,144 times
Reputation: 23295

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by jjrose View Post
And think of the promotions that businesses could run. Half off an appetizer if you voted. First beer free if you voted. 5% off your purchase for voting.
None of which is new and was used extensively during the 19th century.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-19-2015, 11:18 AM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,176,592 times
Reputation: 7875
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrapperJohn View Post
I think they also call those bribes. How about tax credits for buying guns? If we are going to encourage people to exercise their constitutional rights we should be fair.
Haha, true, tax credits for voting would technically be bribing people. But making voting day a national holiday would not.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2015, 11:19 AM
 
4,765 posts, read 3,732,085 times
Reputation: 3038
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrapperJohn View Post
...
If we selected just 10,000 people at random with a 99% confidence level and an interval of 1% the results would mirror 150,000,000 voters.
I am familiar with how stats work. But, nothing has been presented to show that we have actually asked 10,000 people.

Last edited by shaker281; 03-19-2015 at 11:29 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2015, 11:19 AM
 
Location: NE Ohio
30,419 posts, read 20,304,341 times
Reputation: 8958
Quote:
Originally Posted by TigerLily24 View Post
Oh, I get it.

I'll just bet that y'all are sure that it's just one step from mandatory voting to only being allowed to vote for approved candidates.
Riiiight...

How do some people get out of bed every day?
That's a nice stretch of imagination from what I posted. But a dictator is a dictator, so nothing would be far from the realm of possibility, especially with someone like Obama, who has no problem changing the law, even though the President has not been giving legislative power.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2015, 11:22 AM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,176,592 times
Reputation: 7875
Quote:
Originally Posted by nononsenseguy View Post
That's a nice stretch of imagination from what I posted. But a dictator is a dictator, so nothing would be far from the realm of possibility, especially with someone like Obama, who has no problem changing the law, even though the President has not been giving legislative power.
Mandatory voting doesn't mean dictatorship.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2015, 11:22 AM
 
Location: Hiding from Antifa!
7,783 posts, read 6,084,949 times
Reputation: 7099
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
Well if Obama is going to push this then they are going to need groups to go door to door to register folks and bring them to the polls to vote. If the USG makes it mandatory then the USG is responsible to make sure registering and voting is accessible to all.

And what group better suited for this then an ACORN2
He can always start recruiting for the New Black Panther Party.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2015, 11:24 AM
 
25,619 posts, read 36,697,144 times
Reputation: 23295
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fox Terrier View Post
I never said it was a 'new' idea. There have been many topics pertaining to societies discussed over the course of thousands of years of civilization.

I guess you don't understand the phrase 'off the cuff'.
No you don't understand it's usage in your original post or would have worded your supposition differently . If you do understand its contextual usage in your post then you were being dismissively deceptive in your usage.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2015, 11:25 AM
 
Location: New Jersey
12,755 posts, read 9,646,362 times
Reputation: 13169
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
That is what makes this thread so entertaining, people seem to think this is an actual proposal or something.
They seem to be deliberately blind to the fact that requiring 100% voter participation is NOT A MANDATE and HAS NOT BEEN PROPOSED IN ANY LEGISLATION.

Why do they go off as if another one of their FREEDOMS is being taken away, maybe by tomorrow!

Words are scary to them, I guess. Ideas even more so. When people are unable to tell reality from nightmares (or daymares, in this case), that makes them psychotic, right?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2015, 11:27 AM
 
Location: New Jersey
12,755 posts, read 9,646,362 times
Reputation: 13169
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bulldogdad View Post
It is an actual proposal, your just being dishonest.

It's an actual proposal in the circles of people this POSTUS surrounds himself with and seeks counsel.
Were you a fly on the wall? You seem to know so much about the inner workings and all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2015, 11:27 AM
 
Location: Palo Alto
12,149 posts, read 8,417,223 times
Reputation: 4190
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
That wasn't his question, but nice try at dodging the question. We are talking about 100% showing up to the polls and voting, why are right wingers so afraid of this?

I'm not afraid and wish more people voted.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:26 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top