Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-05-2015, 07:03 AM
 
Location: On the Chesapeake
45,356 posts, read 60,546,019 times
Reputation: 60938

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
The problem is that schools have done a horrible job implementing both. Both would have been FAR more successful if students were grouped in classes by ability/skill level so that instruction could be much more specifically targeted. EVERYONE learns more that way, because no one gets shortchanged, as they do now in mixed-ability classrooms where the functional level of the students can vary by 5 or more grade levels. K-12 Education in the US is a joke.
And if a teacher states what you just did s/he gets labeled a troublemaker and accused of hating poor/minority/slower, etc. students and, depending on the school system, called a racist.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-05-2015, 09:42 AM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,725,169 times
Reputation: 20674
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
Texas didn't adopt it but wrote their own instead to bypass the 100% NCLB requirement.
And guess what..Texas TEKS is exactly what CC is about.

Those 5 states that didn't "embrace" CC will have to implement a CC-like curriculum anyway because the ACT/SAT are going to be aligned to Common Core.
Did Texas TEKS appease the masses opposed to CC/ NCLB?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2015, 09:58 AM
 
Location: On the Chesapeake
45,356 posts, read 60,546,019 times
Reputation: 60938
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
No, it isn't. Vocational Education is the non-Academic track in those countries.
Is it Special Ed? No. It's the non-academic vocational track.

Here, in most systems, Vocational Education is now what Special Ed is called. What used to be Vocational Education is now called Technology and Career Education.

Sorry, you're wrong. Or don't understand that European school systems are set up differently than here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2015, 12:18 PM
 
Location: Great Falls, Montana
4,002 posts, read 3,904,593 times
Reputation: 1398
Back in the day, Jimmy Carter and his cohorts discovered that there was big money to be had in education reform.

Was there really anything wrong with education before 1975? .. um .. not really. But that didn't stop the boys at the top from making that area of our world into just another money making proposition.

Every attempt to fix something that wasn't already broken has been a dismal failure - but never mind that - education reformists weren't interested in fixing anything, they were and are, interested in making money, and every since 1980, education reform has been one of the biggest money makers on the hill since the inception of discrimination and racism. (which themselves are huge money makers)

Base 10 is just as worthless as No Child Left Behind - Every single President from Reagan to Obama has been on the education reform meat wagon because it's proven itself to be a wonderful way to make a free buck.

When this nation was founded, people were amazed at the literacy level of Americans - We had no formal education standards .. we had no one telling us what to learn and how to learn ... there were no government mandated guidelines or rules. People learned to read and write because they wanted to, and though any discipline might have been applied to achieve the goal of being educated at the time, we became known for our tact and intelligence.

Education has been rambling along since our founding, unabated and full of the kinds of information that gave a free nation the power to pick and choose their way along the course of his or her own academics.

Since 1980, it's all gone to h*ll and back with less people being truly educated than ever before. Standards mandated by the powers that be that saw our eventual undoing with High School kids graduating without even knowing how to read.

So when you ask the question, "Common Core: What's The Deal?" -- you'll find all of the answers you need by looking back over the history of the Dept of Education ... Government policy as it might be applied to the education of our children is a huge failure that pays ungawdly huge dividends to the ones that make the policy.

Short answer? ... Education reform doesn't work - It was never intended to work from the very beginning.

Common Core will fail as it was designed to do just like all of the others - In a few years and with a new President and Education Secretary, we'll all be faced with another "New and Improved" reform that will fail -- and so it goes, and so it goes ...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2015, 12:28 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,464,288 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by middle-aged mom View Post
Did Texas TEKS appease the masses opposed to CC/ NCLB?
Yes it does. Outside of education workers people think Texas has it's own curriculum.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2015, 12:45 PM
 
Location: Jacksonville, FL
11,143 posts, read 10,708,302 times
Reputation: 9799
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigskydude View Post
Back in the day, Jimmy Carter and his cohorts discovered that there was big money to be had in education reform.

Was there really anything wrong with education before 1975? .. um .. not really. But that didn't stop the boys at the top from making that area of our world into just another money making proposition.

Every attempt to fix something that wasn't already broken has been a dismal failure - but never mind that - education reformists weren't interested in fixing anything, they were and are, interested in making money, and every since 1980, education reform has been one of the biggest money makers on the hill since the inception of discrimination and racism. (which themselves are huge money makers)

Base 10 is just as worthless as No Child Left Behind - Every single President from Reagan to Obama has been on the education reform meat wagon because it's proven itself to be a wonderful way to make a free buck.

When this nation was founded, people were amazed at the literacy level of Americans - We had no formal education standards .. we had no one telling us what to learn and how to learn ... there were no government mandated guidelines or rules. People learned to read and write because they wanted to, and though any discipline might have been applied to achieve the goal of being educated at the time, we became known for our tact and intelligence.

Education has been rambling along since our founding, unabated and full of the kinds of information that gave a free nation the power to pick and choose their way along the course of his or her own academics.

Since 1980, it's all gone to h*ll and back with less people being truly educated than ever before. Standards mandated by the powers that be that saw our eventual undoing with High School kids graduating without even knowing how to read.

So when you ask the question, "Common Core: What's The Deal?" -- you'll find all of the answers you need by looking back over the history of the Dept of Education ... Government policy as it might be applied to the education of our children is a huge failure that pays ungawdly huge dividends to the ones that make the policy.

Short answer? ... Education reform doesn't work - It was never intended to work from the very beginning.

Common Core will fail as it was designed to do just like all of the others - In a few years and with a new President and Education Secretary, we'll all be faced with another "New and Improved" reform that will fail -- and so it goes, and so it goes ...
Possibly the best summary of the decline of our education system that I've yet seen. Well done.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-06-2015, 02:24 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
88,995 posts, read 44,804,275 times
Reputation: 13695
Quote:
Originally Posted by North Beach Person View Post
And if a teacher states what you just did s/he gets labeled a troublemaker and accused of hating poor/minority/slower, etc. students and, depending on the school system, called a racist.
I find that really hard to believe considering the fact that teachers unions are some of the most powerful unions in the US. Harness that power and make the necessary changes. Otherwise, sit back and watch the ever-continuing dumbing-down downward spiral.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-06-2015, 02:28 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
88,995 posts, read 44,804,275 times
Reputation: 13695
Quote:
Originally Posted by North Beach Person View Post
Is it Special Ed? No. It's the non-academic vocational track.

Here, in most systems, Vocational Education is now what Special Ed is called.
I don't see that. Can you give a specific example?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-07-2015, 09:34 AM
 
Location: On the Chesapeake
45,356 posts, read 60,546,019 times
Reputation: 60938
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
I find that really hard to believe considering the fact that teachers unions are some of the most powerful unions in the US. Harness that power and make the necessary changes. Otherwise, sit back and watch the ever-continuing dumbing-down downward spiral.
Except for a couple states "powerful Teacher's Unions" is an oxymoron. That is a pernicious urban myth with no basis in reality for most teachers in the US.

Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
I don't see that. Can you give a specific example?
http://www.llakes.org/wp-content/upl...West-final.pdf

The EU is trying to integrate special needs students into vocational training the last few years. Historically that wasn't done.

What those countries actually actually do, and have always done, is start tracking students very early so by the time the PISA tests are administered anyone in the vocational track is out of the academic setting and in vocational training.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-07-2015, 09:53 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
88,995 posts, read 44,804,275 times
Reputation: 13695
Quote:
Originally Posted by North Beach Person View Post
http://www.llakes.org/wp-content/upl...West-final.pdf

The EU is trying to integrate special needs students into vocational training the last few years. Historically that wasn't done.
That's not an example of how Special Ed in the US is now called Vocational Ed. Please give an example of that. That's what I asked.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top