Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Yup. Pick a conspiracy, and someone who supports the Bundy bunglers will grab onto it.
I wasn't surprised when the FBI busted the guy who intended to blow up a BLM line shack in the Gold Butte area of Arizona. That area, all hard desert that lies on the edges of Utah, Arizona and Nevada, breeds a lot of extremist hard cases. The LDS religion plays a part in that, but so does the geography and the isolation.
I've seen a lot of hardcases in my day, living out here, but the ones down there really top them all. The desert burns a meanness into them you just don't see in other places, and they tend to flock together like a bunch of buzzards. All the little towns have a lot of very cranky stuff happening all the time in them, and a person who's just passing through had best be alert and careful in speech and action.
This is just as true with the guys who are nature lovers as any others, along with types most folks who think would tend to be sweet tempered and sensitive in their temperament. I've met as many militant conservationalists as the guys who think they own everything in sight, and they are just as ornery as the Bundys.
It must be the heat and the lack of water. I dunno, but it's sure true. Not all are dangerous, but too many are, or have the potential. Radical is a universal word that can be applied in all sides, and in all directions in that desert country to just about everything.
I agree there are crazy people on both sides of the issue but I think the far right is more militant. I just find it very offensive that the motivation of people like the Bundy group is just greed'
I'm sure this will come up again with the proposed expansion of Arches National Park in Utah to include Bears Ears.
A prospect is not a mine. It's not even a sure deposit. It is only a place where some trace ore was found.
Uranium is often found in traces alongside other metallic mineral deposits. "Prospect" is the word for the discovery and registration of a possible deposit, and does not mean anything more than a trace will ever be found. That's why prospectors are called prospectors.
There are trace deposits all over the Silver Valley in Idaho, and dredging the bottom of Lake Coeur d'Alene would probably show some traces of uranium.
Whether any of those deposits will ever be actually mined in Oregon is another matter. In that list of yours, there was only one actual mine on the list, and it was mining a surface deposit. Surface mining could make a small profit selling small ore samples to rock hounds and geological sample kit makers. Without either a mechanical or chemical mill, the ore itself is next to worthless in an unprocessed state.
Sorry. Better try next time. Those places on your map are nothing but indicators someone was putting up about $50 for bragging rights they have a uranium claim. Any dedicated rockhound in the intermountain west could tell you of dozens of other sites that are identical.
Mining companies are nothing but organized prospectors. Every mining company in the world submits claims like the one you mentioned; there are 2 similar claims in central Idaho that are identical, but won't probably ever become mines, and one in Montana that is a gold claim but has as much tin and uranium as gold. It's just outside the Yellowstone Park's northeast boundary.
The mining company found it to be rich enough to submit the paperwork that follows a claim, but the company never actually was granted a mining permit; no way to get the ore out without going through the park. Since any mine is a multi-million investment that is always risky, don't hold your breath waiting for Oregon Energy to start digging for uranium any time soon. The claim was literally dirt cheap to obtain, and is the easiest part of the entire permit process.
Now that the Euro has taken a dive, buying uranium from Europe is a bigger bargain than ever before.
Try to get past your rage for Bundy and company and focus on donations to the Clinton Foundation.........
Why are these people donating to the Clinton Foundation? Undisclosed amounts!
http://www.npr.org/2015/04/23/401781...ranium-company
SIEGEL: Uranium being a strategic commodity, and therefore it requires a rather high level of approval from the U.S.
BECKER: Yeah. Multiple agencies had to sign off on this including the State Department. And why that's interesting is that the men who had built and financed this company behind this deal were some of Bill Clinton's biggest donors, and one man, the chairman of the company, had donated, we found, 2.35 million dollars in donations that the Clinton Foundation had failed to disclose.
SIEGEL: Had failed to disclose - you mean there was no public record of receiving the donation to the Foundation?
BECKER: Right. When Hillary Clinton became Secretary of State, the Obama White House asked her to sign a memorandum of understanding because Bill Clinton was going to continue to raise money for his foundation. And part of the memorandum of understanding was that she would disclose all donations. The other part of it was that they wouldn't take foreign donations while she was Secretary of State. And she's now saying that they won't take foreign donations if she becomes president, but what the story really underscores is sort of the special challenges when you have a foundation that's raising money from foreign interests that couldn't contribute, by the way, to an American political campaign, but can to these kinds of foundations.
SIEGEL: There's also the eye-popping $500,000 speaking fee that Bill Clinton received in Russia. What is the connection, if any, to the entire uranium mine acquisition?
SIEGEL: The approval of the acquisition of Uranium One?
BECKER: Exactly. We don't know the answer to that. And this process - it's called a CFIUS review - is shrouded in secrecy. By law, actually, any documents related to it are exempt from public disclosure laws. But certainly, in today's climate where you have Mr. Putin annexing the Crimea and Americans levying sanctions against him, the context today is quite different. And we talked to people who say, you know, there's really reason to be concerned about this deal in today's climate because among other things it made Russia one of the largest uranium suppliers. Secondly, the uranium mines that the Russians really wanted were the Kazakh mines. However, the American mines comprise 20 perecent - 20 percent, that's quite a lot - of all known uranium in the United States.
A bunch of squatters went to jail where they belong.
The End.
Its not about the Bundy.......... you people are blind and fail to see even those on the left appear to be concerned.
Donations made to the Clinton Foundation and promising minerals to Russia should be paid close attention to. Clinton Foundation Linked To Russian Effort To Buy Uranium Company : NPR
SIEGEL: This is a very complicated tale that we can't do full justice to in the few minutes we have, so give us a nutshell summary. First, who wanted what from the U.S. government?
BECKER: A company named Uranium One based in Canada needed approval to sell a 51-percent stake of the company to an arm of the Russian government called Rosatom.
SIEGEL: And the company Uranium One owned uranium mines in the United States.
BECKER: It did. It also owned stakes in large mines - very lucrative mines in Kazakhstan, and that actually was primarily what the Russian government was interested in. But because they had these mines in Wyoming, the deal required government approval.
"Its not about the Bundy.......... you people are blind and fail to see even those on the left appear to be concerned."
That's funny... the title of the thread says its about the Bundys, not about uranium.
And it was, until you ran it off the tracks with your crackpot conspiracy theories.
I never heard anyone in the Bundy bunch mutter a single word about uranium either. If your nonsense had anything to it, I think at least one of those people would have said something over the course of the 40+ days of the standoff.
Rather confusing for you to post a link called "The Captain's Journal » Why Did Robert ‘LaVoy’ Finicum Have To Die? The Connection Between Malheur, Putin, The Clinton Foundation, And Big Money[/quote], with a follow-up comment saying "Is uranium at the heart of the Oregon Malheur federal-protestor standoff?", in thread labeled "Bundy Ranch" - then insist it has nothing to to with the Bundys.
Rather confusing for you to post a link called "The Captain's Journal » Why Did Robert ‘LaVoy’ Finicum Have To Die? The Connection Between Malheur, Putin, The Clinton Foundation, And Big Money
, with a follow-up comment saying "Is uranium at the heart of the Oregon Malheur federal-protestor standoff?", in thread labeled "Bundy Ranch" - then insist it has nothing to to with the Bundys.[/quote]
Rather confusing for you to post a link called "The Captain's Journal » Why Did Robert ‘LaVoy’ Finicum Have To Die? The Connection Between Malheur, Putin, The Clinton Foundation, And Big Money, with a follow-up comment saying "Is uranium at the heart of the Oregon Malheur federal-protestor standoff?", in thread labeled "Bundy Ranch" - then insist it has nothing to to with the Bundys.
It's about Uranium One just as NPR is talking about, which confirmed Captain Journal! Have another shot.....if you can hold your whiskey!
Last edited by wildflower82; 06-25-2016 at 10:55 PM..
I wouldn't doubt It if Bill Clinton sent quite a bit of funds to the ranch, it only makes sense. Oh crap, you guys are talking about the bundy ranch, I thought you said bunny ranch.... Never mind.
, with a follow-up comment saying "Is uranium at the heart of the Oregon Malheur federal-protestor standoff?", in thread labeled "Bundy Ranch" - then insist it has nothing to to with the Bundys.
The reason I said it wasn't about the Bundys, because all you would talk about is the standoff.......there is more to it.
If NPR, New York Times and now other news people are discussing it, so can I. The reason I picked this thread was to not start another and it does have to do with the Bundys, but it's Clinton Foundation you people are not discussing, along with Clinton crime........ is NYT now liars?
BOMBSHELL – CLINTON SELLING URANIUM to RUSSIANS – LINK to HAMMOND / BUNDY RANCHES AND MINERALS in the GROUND? Oh my! | Resurrect The Republic
This article will unequivocally implicate Hillary Clinton in her role of deliberately committing abject treason against the people of the United States through the illegal appropriation of uranium at both the Bundy and the Hammond ranches and then selling the uranium to the Russians in order to help fund her presidential run through a largely untraceable offshore account. I am taken back by the brazenness of the plot. I am even further taken back by the fact this event, as the reader will soon learn, was reported in the New York Times, as well as other mainstream media outlets. Is it really necessary to point out that the uranium that is subsequently being sold to the Russians could potentially be used against the American people and its military, in the form of nuclear weapons; and this blood money is helping to fund the presidential campaign of a political despot of epic proportions.
Please walk through with me the progression of the events and facts related to this story, which accurately casts Hillary Clinton into the light as the single biggest femme fatale traitor in American History. Making the Connections Between the Bundy and Hammond Ranches and the Presence of Coveted Uranium..................................Go to the youtube channel owned by dutchsinse.
One of the big problems in America today is that “public servants” like Hillary Clinton actually represent a foreign enemy masquerading as a domestic public servant. I will go one step further than Donald Trump’s assertion and state that Hillary Clinton is this generation’s Ethel Rosenberg.
Ethel Rosenberg was convicted and executed for selling nuclear secrets to the Soviets.
Hillary Clinton, the Ethel Rosenberg of her generation. Clinton sold uranium to the Russians while serving as the Secretary of State and this is what both the Bundy and the Hammond Ranch Affairs are all about. And there is nothing to suggest that these nefarious acts are still ongoing.
A former key member of the Obama administration and current Presidential candidate, Hillary Clinton, has proven herself to be the Ethel Rosenberg of her generation. You may recall your U.S. history, as Ethel Rosenberg sold nuclear secrets to the Soviet Union at the height of the Cold War. In an act every bit as egregious as Ethel Rosenberg’s treason, Hillary Clinton sold uranium to the Russians while serving as the Secretary of State. Ironically, the original source on this treasonous act committed by Clinton was none other than the liberal rag we call the New York Times.
The New York Times further asserts that members of the Canadian mining industry, who have supported Clinton’s campaign, financed and sold off to the Russians a company known as Uranium One. Uranium One is directly responsible for transferring uranium from BLM land to the Russians through an off-shore holding company. Again, according to the NY Times, the Russians, through three separate transactions, acquired Uranium One, while paying off the Clintons and their Canadian partners from 2009-2013. The business deal also involved paying Bill Clinton $500,000 dollars for a speech on energy which was delivered in Moscow.
If one wants to understand how a 73-year-old rancher could be sentenced, as a terrorist, to five years in prison for overseeing a controlled burn, for legitimate purposes, I just told you all you need to click on the below link.
Hillary Clinton: the Benghazi murders, 36,000 national security emails on her private computer, and now this? And some of you would have the country believe that I am opposed to Hillary Clinton because she is a woman. God help us!
Quote:
That's actually pretty 'effin hilarious
You certainly need to get outside more!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
