Iran And World Powers Agree On Framework For Nuclear Deal (vs, government)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
They will inspect their nuclear facilities, that is why.
So let's kill off the deal and Iran can continue to enrich and then what, hope that sanctions take effect. Remove inspections and an agreement and they continue down the path, how exactly will you be able to tell what Iran is doing relative to their nuclear facilities.
And then for the umpteenth time.. they have expressed nuclear genocide to Israel and death to America.
And then for the umpteenth time.. they have expressed nuclear genocide to Israel and death to America.
You don't kill off a deal because some leaders have made irrational statements, Iran has much more to fear about the US based on our history and what we actually did to them, not what could be but what we actually did to destroy their country.
This is one of the most rational and reasonable administrations in Iran in decades.
Muahah that's rich. The whole world is making all this up says ericsami!
Iran violated agreements while extracted benefits from the agreement. And they have been paying the consequences ever since.
if you were interested in truth you would go look up Parchin military base.
you would go look up a military base in the North of Iran that IAEA went to and found nothing.
you would even loook up the military base in the west of Iran in province of Kurdistan that west was claiming there was nuclear facilities there. I mean why the hell would IRanians build a nuclear facility in the west and just Make the round trip for Israeli planes 700 miles shorter.
Of course it would make no sense. Except There was probably hope for the IAEA to go there an over the nature of that base. which was not nuclear.
You don't kill off a deal because some leaders have made irrational statements, Iran has much more to fear about the US based on our history and what we actually did to them, not what could be but what we actually did to destroy their country.
This is one of the most rational and reasonable administrations in Iran in decades.
When a country makes a repeated "irrational statement" for decades, the people of that threatened country is within their duty to be concern. Considering the history of Israel and the violence that she has been subjugated too, Prime Minister Netanyahu is within his rights to be concerned about Iran's nuclear program. Do not forget that Iran is the prime sponsor of terrorism, in which the Ayatollah's have employed proxy terrorist organizations to continue the armed struggle against Israel. Iran has as much blood on their hands as ISIS. The only difference between the two is one is more chaotic.
if you were interested in truth you would go look up Parchin military base.
you would go look up a military base in the North of Iran that IAEA went to and found nothing.
you would even loook up the military base in the west of Iran in province of Kurdistan that west was claiming there was nuclear facilities there. I mean why the hell would IRanians build a nuclear facility in the west and just Make the round trip for Israeli planes 700 miles shorter.
Of course it would make no sense. Except There was probably hope for the IAEA to go there an over the nature of that base. which was not nuclear.
C. Facilities Declared under Iran’s Safeguards Agreement
12. Under its Safeguards Agreement, Iran has declared to the Agency 18 nuclear facilities and nine locations outside facilities where nuclear material is customarily used (LOFs)15 (Annex II). Notwithstanding that certain of the activities being undertaken by Iran at some of the facilities are contrary to the relevant resolutions of the Board of Governors and the Security Council, as indicated below, the Agency continues to verify the non-diversion of declared nuclear material at these facilities and LOFs.
H. Possible Military Dimensions
62. Since the Director General’s previous report, at a particular location at the Parchin site, the Agency has observed, through satellite imagery, the presence of vehicles, equipment and probable construction materials, but no further external changes to the buildings on the site. As previously reported, the activities that have taken place at this location since February 2012 are likely to have undermined the Agency’s ability to conduct effective verification.71 It remains important for Iran to provide answers to the Agency’s questions72 and access to the particular location at the Parchin site.73
Please refer to the latest IAEA report. The IAEA is unsatisfied with the ambiguity of its nuclear program and Iran's refusal to allow access to the Parchin site.
Yes, I keep seeing report after report on how the all sanctions are suppose to be lifted the same day that the deal is signed. That is not what Obama said during the speech, he clearly said gradually at different steps. Something isn't right here.
yes never mind that IAEA has already visited the place twice.
but because of pushes by western intel agencies they want to go to visit a place again that they previously found no evidence in.
Wonder how the Iranian people will react if their government rejects a deal and the sanctions continue. I doubt they will blame the evil Netanyahu.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
