Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-05-2015, 01:45 PM
 
15,590 posts, read 15,690,850 times
Reputation: 22004

Advertisements

It's pretty well documented that Bush and his minions lied, apart from Saddam's own lies.

It's even documented how uncomfortable Powell was with being obliged to promote the lies, for instance.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-05-2015, 02:17 PM
 
Location: Texas
38,859 posts, read 25,562,839 times
Reputation: 24780
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
We dispensed with Saddam and his army in no time. If that had been the plan we would have been in and out in no time.

A large part of the plan was that there was no plan.

Predictably, the entire country was plunged into utter chaos. The civilian population was left w/o electricity, water, all the basics as a direct result.

Bob Woodward's State of Denial goes into great detail how they really had nothing in place to manage the post-invasion environment. Subsequent events strongly support that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2015, 02:22 PM
 
Location: Texas
38,859 posts, read 25,562,839 times
Reputation: 24780
Quote:
Originally Posted by siobhandem View Post
Republicans loved squandering trillions in Iraq, and want to do the same in Iran.

So true.

Trillions of taxpayer dollars spent to blast more bomb craters in the middle east sand and camel dung is "protecting our freedoms." And "no cost is too high to maintain our liberty!"

But how about some infrastructure repair, you Pubs? We taxpayers need some improvements here at home.

"Pork barrel!" cry the Pubs in congress.

They just hate spending taxpayer funds to benefit taxpayers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2015, 02:24 PM
 
Location: Old Bellevue, WA
18,782 posts, read 17,374,090 times
Reputation: 7990
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
It was none of our business. If we had done nothing Iraq would still be the relatively modern (for middle east standards) country with the occasional nasty episode to keep the extremists down.

This is why I say whether he went in on a lie or not doesn't matter. Here it is 12 years later and things are a mess.
Read the OP again. It is focused on one thing: the question of whether Bush/Cheney lied about WMD in order to invade Iraq.. The answer is no.

Having an accurate historical record is important in an of itself. Accuracy DOES matter.

What you are doing is committing the logical fallacy of 'moving the goalposts.'
Moving the Goalposts

You can post a thread about whether we should have gone to Iraq, what a mess it turned into, etc. This one is about whether "Bush lied, thousands died."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2015, 02:35 PM
 
12,638 posts, read 8,962,271 times
Reputation: 7458
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cida View Post
It's pretty well documented that Bush and his minions lied, apart from Saddam's own lies.

It's even documented how uncomfortable Powell was with being obliged to promote the lies, for instance.
No, it isn't. Unless you count media matters as a reliable source. Or daily emails from the DNC, which you obviously get and regurgitate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2015, 02:44 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,250,702 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by wutitiz View Post
Read the OP again. It is focused on one thing: the question of whether Bush/Cheney lied about WMD in order to invade Iraq.. The answer is no.

Having an accurate historical record is important in an of itself. Accuracy DOES matter.

What you are doing is committing the logical fallacy of 'moving the goalposts.'
Moving the Goalposts

You can post a thread about whether we should have gone to Iraq, what a mess it turned into, etc. This one is about whether "Bush lied, thousands died."
My first post addressed that. It's a non issue. Lie or not it was a failure.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2015, 02:49 PM
 
Location: Old Bellevue, WA
18,782 posts, read 17,374,090 times
Reputation: 7990
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Gringo View Post
A large part of the plan was that there was no plan.

Predictably, the entire country was plunged into utter chaos. The civilian population was left w/o electricity, water, all the basics as a direct result.

Bob Woodward's State of Denial goes into great detail how they really had nothing in place to manage the post-invasion environment. Subsequent events strongly support that.
This I can agree with 100%. The planning for 'Phase IV' (occupation) was a muddle and an afterthought. Also they did not know anything about the internals of Iraq, and how to deal with the tribal and sectarian fault lines that were uncovered after Saddam was deposed.

This is accurate and legit criticism of W Bush, and there are others to be made. What I don't understand is the seeming need to make up false criticisms, such as "Bush lied thousands died" or that the war was a major culprit re our national debt (the war cost $806 billion, not "trillions").
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2015, 03:02 PM
 
Location: Old Bellevue, WA
18,782 posts, read 17,374,090 times
Reputation: 7990
Quote:
Originally Posted by wutitiz
Read the OP again. It is focused on one thing: the question of whether Bush/Cheney lied about WMD in order to invade Iraq.. The answer is no.

Having an accurate historical record is important in an of itself. Accuracy DOES matter.

What you are doing is committing the logical fallacy of 'moving the goalposts.'
Moving the Goalposts

You can post a thread about whether we should have gone to Iraq, what a mess it turned into, etc. This one is about whether "Bush lied, thousands died."
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
My first post addressed that. It's a non issue. Lie or not it was a failure.
Your first post does not address anything. You're just restating your assertion that 'it matters none' with nothing to back it up.

Quote:
It's irrelevant. It matters none. Lie or the truth he got us into a war we had no business being in and screwed it up.
Again, historical accuracy does matter. If nothing else, we can't let any political factions out there, whether left or right, get away with disseminating inaccuracies to the unwashed masses. If one faction gets away with it, others will follow.

Especially in the context of democracy, historical accuracy is critical.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2015, 04:43 PM
 
Location: Texas
38,859 posts, read 25,562,839 times
Reputation: 24780
Quote:
Originally Posted by wutitiz View Post
This I can agree with 100%. The planning for 'Phase IV' (occupation) was a muddle and an afterthought. Also they did not know anything about the internals of Iraq, and how to deal with the tribal and sectarian fault lines that were uncovered after Saddam was deposed.

This is accurate and legit criticism of W Bush, and there are others to be made. What I don't understand is the seeming need to make up false criticisms, such as "Bush lied thousands died" or that the war was a major culprit re our national debt (the war cost $806 billion, not "trillions").
The cost is much higher than 806 billion, although in itself is a significant figure.

The Iraq War Could Cost More Than $6 Trillion - Business Insider
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2015, 04:48 PM
 
Location: NC
11,223 posts, read 8,312,275 times
Reputation: 12479
I didn't read much of the OP, nor any responses, but he lied about as much as Obama did about "you can keep your insurance if you like it".

Bush might or might not have outright lied. Obama gave bad and incomplete information.

Both should have, and DID know better. Why do people start threads trying to defend politicians? They are mostly indefensible.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top