Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
a 17 year old does not have the education, job or salary to take care of an infant. she will either need family help or government.
Most likely this will be the case of a conservative family, why should we care?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guamanians
The irony is that the pro choice people are protecting a persons right to choose, while pro-life is protecting a persons life. The mother wouldn't be alive if she were aborted. The "choice" that they are referring to is ALWAYS about abortion. If they were being honest then a "pro choice" advocate would encourage adoption as a solid alternative.
Another irony is that many of those same pro choice people are against the death penalty and also against KFC for killing chickens.
So, its morally wrong to kill a crazy murder-rapist? But, its none of our business if babies are aborted?
Abortion isn't really the subject. The subject: Is a legal 17 yr old having sex and getting pregnant. If her family steps and feeds and clothes the child......what are we talking about a young girl of marrying age having sex? I see the OP can't answer this either!
Seems this is bash the 17 yr old girl of a Christian family for doing what comes natural at 17!
Status:
"It Can't Rain All The Time"
(set 28 days ago)
Location: North Pacific
15,754 posts, read 7,591,221 times
Reputation: 2576
Quote:
Originally Posted by GregW
Too bad the rest of the world has not excepted the idea that "ONE IS ENOUGH". If they did the world population of humans would eventually decrease to a sustainable level around 1 billion people.
Status:
"It Can't Rain All The Time"
(set 28 days ago)
Location: North Pacific
15,754 posts, read 7,591,221 times
Reputation: 2576
Quote:
Originally Posted by 3~Shepherds
Most likely this will be the case of a conservative family, why should we care?
Abortion isn't really the subject. The subject: Is a legal 17 yr old having sex and getting pregnant. If her family steps and feeds and clothes the child......what are we talking about a young girl of marrying age having sex? I see the OP can't answer this either!
Seems this is bash the 17 yr old girl of a Christian family for doing what comes natural at 17!
Most likely this will be the case of a conservative family, why should we care?
Abortion isn't really the subject. The subject: Is a legal 17 yr old having sex and getting pregnant. If her family steps and feeds and clothes the child......what are we talking about a young girl of marrying age having sex? I see the OP can't answer this either!
Seems this is bash the 17 yr old girl of a Christian family for doing what comes natural at 17!
a 17 year old having a baby is still a bad idea even if her family can help her. she still most likely will not finish her education or get a higher education where she would be able to get a degree and a better job in life. most lower and middle class families are struggling themselves and can not help or can help so little that the kid and the baby go on welfare, you can't seriously think a 17 year old having a baby is a good idea for anyone, even the baby.
btw what is a "legal" 17 year old. isn't the age 18 to be considered legal?
the op is not bashing a christian family for a kid getting pregnant, it is about the unrealistic idea that abstinence only education can prevent pregnancy
Status:
"It Can't Rain All The Time"
(set 28 days ago)
Location: North Pacific
15,754 posts, read 7,591,221 times
Reputation: 2576
Quote:
Originally Posted by hothulamaui
a 17 year old having a baby is still a bad idea even if her family can help her. she still most likely will not finish her education or get a higher education where she would be able to get a degree and a better job in life. most lower and middle class families are struggling themselves and can not help or can help so little that the kid and the baby go on welfare, you can't seriously think a 17 year old having a baby is a good idea for anyone, even the baby.
btw what is a "legal" 17 year old. isn't the age 18 to be considered legal?
the op is not bashing a christian family for a kid getting pregnant, it is about the unrealistic idea that abstinence only education can prevent pregnancy
ref to bolded
What would you say to a 17 year old that had a baby at 17, went on to get her GED and her bachelors degree and a well paying job. That person did what, the impossible? Or achieved a less likely?
Choices are for the individual to make, not for society to make for them.
Life experiences teach us, where government officials fail.
What would you say to a 17 year old that had a baby at 17, went on to get her GED and her bachelors degree and a well paying job. That person did what, the impossible? Or achieved a less likely?
Choices are for the individual to make, not for society to make for them.
Life experiences teach us, where government officials fail.
yes one in every so many hundreds/thousands manages to continue their education and go on to lead a life where they don't struggle. however that is not the norm and you know it. most will end up on welfare.
Status:
"It Can't Rain All The Time"
(set 28 days ago)
Location: North Pacific
15,754 posts, read 7,591,221 times
Reputation: 2576
Quote:
Originally Posted by hothulamaui
yes one in every so many hundreds/thousands manages to continue their education and go on to lead a life where they don't struggle. however that is not the norm and you know it. most will end up on welfare.
know I don't know it. and neither does your speculation, prove it.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.