Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-07-2015, 09:26 AM
 
Location: Middle of nowhere
24,260 posts, read 14,197,584 times
Reputation: 9895

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by theunbrainwashed View Post
Reading through the thread, a lot of posters are only concentrating on the gay marriage aspect of the whole deal. That was not my intention. My intention was, why are special interest groups in general, from gay rights to NAACP type to KKK type activists, taking their frustrations out on the poor mom-and-pop baker who doesn't have a dog in the fight? I'm not concentrating on one group of people, I'm talking about ALL of them. People used to have marches over things like this, now it's cakes? Give me a break!
The issue is that these mom and pop shops are in some cases violating the laws of the state, and then claiming some special right to violate generally applicable laws because of their "religious beliefs".

I can't claim "religious beliefs" to get around law violations, why should they be allowed to do so?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-07-2015, 09:31 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
88,971 posts, read 44,780,079 times
Reputation: 13679
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjrose View Post
As the ruling indicates, Alito is correct. The ruling is only applicable to closely held corporations, and a less-restrictive means of access must also be available. For most if not all of the businesses under attack, both requirements are true.

What do you not get about that?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-07-2015, 09:47 AM
 
Location: Middle of nowhere
24,260 posts, read 14,197,584 times
Reputation: 9895
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
As the ruling indicates, Alito is correct. The ruling is only applicable to closely held corporations, and a less-restrictive means of access must also be available. For most if not all of the businesses under attack, both requirements are true.

What do you not get about that?
You're right. No closely held corp has to provide BC to employees if it violates their religious beliefs. THAT is what this ruling says. It says nothing about anti-discrimination laws.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-07-2015, 10:07 AM
 
950 posts, read 923,628 times
Reputation: 1629
The gays are no better than the Muslims who target someone for "offending " them.

The gays stooped so low as to enter a Catholic church and disrupt Sunday mass in a feeble attempt to get the church to condone their lifestyle.

The gays are no better than the Westboro group
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-07-2015, 10:11 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
88,971 posts, read 44,780,079 times
Reputation: 13679
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjrose View Post
You're right. No closely held corp has to provide BC to employees if it violates their religious beliefs.
You're even getting that wrong. Companies don't provide BC to employees. They provide insurance that covers BC pharmaceuticals/goods/services to employees. And in the HL case, only insurance coverage for pharmaceuticals/devices provided to females were involved. Note specifically that SCOTUS didn't even entertain the gender-based discrimination of that. And why? Because anti-discrimination laws don't trump the First Amendment.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-07-2015, 10:20 AM
 
13,302 posts, read 7,864,463 times
Reputation: 2142
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
No, they were told the business declines to participate in same sex weddings, which is a valid First Amendment religious exercise objection, particularly because wedding goods/services are available via less-restrictive means (SCOTUS HL ruling) elsewhere. Other than that, they were sold whichever items they wanted. Everyone knows that, which is why the bullying tactics are backfiring and making gays look like bad.
Gays believe that the State is the Holy Ghost.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-07-2015, 10:21 AM
 
9,000 posts, read 10,173,705 times
Reputation: 14526
Quote:
Originally Posted by Workin_Hard View Post
It means to buy into the illusion that it's not only acceptable, but completely normal and in every way on par with heterosexuality - and that it's a perfectly acceptable choice for any and all members of your and every other family. That they can form relationships equal in every way, that the "families" created are just a natural and good (if not better), and that their chosen lifestyle should be embraced and encouraged by all. You must accept that your children will be indoctrinated not with your family values, but with those of gay supporters, because after all, you're just not "progressive" enough. And when your son or daughter brings home a boyfriend or girlfriend for Thanksgiving dinner, it's all good and you should welcome the newcomer into your home and to your table, seeing it all as a great expression of their choice to no longer be bound by the ignorance of a backward society.

And if you don't, or express any reservations about any part of it, you will be personally attacked and your ability to earn a living destroyed as you are branded with the most terrible of labels as "intolerant" or "prejudiced" of such a fabulous lifestyle. And this will be done with all the drama and hatred they can muster. Sequins, glitter and a music track of showtunes are all optional.


Brilliantly stated.

It's to the point I'm wondering when blowback will start w/ this gay agenda.....
Because people will only take so much harassment....
Gay people can't leave well enough alone-
they got what they wanted- same sex marriage...
Now they want to shove it in our faces.
Hell no.
Time to stand up for our rights.
I work for people I choose to work for, period.

And yes this country really is pathetic....
To allow a gay agenda to bully them into compliance-
It is disgusting.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-07-2015, 10:23 AM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,707,495 times
Reputation: 20674
Quote:
Originally Posted by juneaubound View Post

There will be another shiny object placed in front of us within the next week, and then we can all move on and get upset about that one.
So true.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-07-2015, 10:32 AM
 
Location: Berwick, Penna.
16,214 posts, read 11,325,556 times
Reputation: 20827
Quote:
Originally Posted by VJDAY81445 View Post
The gays are no better than the Muslims who target someone for "offending " them.

The gays stooped so low as to enter a Catholic church and disrupt Sunday mass in a feeble attempt to get the church to condone their lifestyle.

The gays are no better than the Westboro group
Exactly! LGBT militants are deliberately seeking out marginal samll businesses where a known Chrisitian influence is likely to be present. And if the owner takes his/her beliefs seriously enough to stand up for them -- so much the better from the LGBT agressors' point of view. The whole idea is simply to land a "low blow" against someone they have been condtioned to hate and fear.

What amazes me is why an organized group of Evangelicals don't descend upon a gay bar (also, under the law, a place of "public accomodation") to sing hymns, pass out tracts, and proselytize.

The self-proclaimed "liberals"among the LGBT's would throw an epic tantrum -- further putting their contradictions and hypocrasy where all of us could see it.

Last edited by 2nd trick op; 04-07-2015 at 10:41 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-07-2015, 11:05 AM
 
Location: Stillwater, Oklahoma
30,976 posts, read 21,621,734 times
Reputation: 9676
It simply proves that the power of hate is stronger than the power of love.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:12 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top