Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-19-2014, 10:45 AM
 
Location: Cold Springs, NV
4,625 posts, read 12,299,513 times
Reputation: 5233

Advertisements

Which president presided over the greatest deficit % in relationship to GDP?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-19-2014, 10:50 AM
 
Location: San Francisco
8,982 posts, read 10,466,947 times
Reputation: 5752
Truman, I think.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2014, 11:04 AM
 
Location: Cold Springs, NV
4,625 posts, read 12,299,513 times
Reputation: 5233
Quote:
Originally Posted by pch1013 View Post
Truman, I think.
This is correct, and the highest tax rate in 1945 was 91% and it fell in the following 30 years. Why, and what changed to increase it again?
National debt of the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2014, 11:44 AM
 
Location: Cold Springs, NV
4,625 posts, read 12,299,513 times
Reputation: 5233
Keep focus gentlemen.

Okay, so we continued to keep the debt ratio down even during Vietnam. What changed between 1960's, and the 1980's that changed this pattern?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2014, 11:45 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,135,461 times
Reputation: 9383
You know back in those days, welfare consisted of

A block of cheese, a jar of peanut butter, and a box of powdered milk.. Compare that to today..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2014, 11:47 AM
 
Location: Cold Springs, NV
4,625 posts, read 12,299,513 times
Reputation: 5233
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
You know back in those days, welfare consisted of

A block of cheese, a jar of peanut butter, and a box of powdered milk.. Compare that to today..
I was hoping for intelligent responses and not generalizations.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2014, 11:48 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,135,461 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrWillys View Post
I was hoping for intelligent responses and not generalizations.
I gave you an example of the federal government exploading their spending.. Thats not generalization, my example was pretty dam specific..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2014, 11:50 AM
 
Location: Cold Springs, NV
4,625 posts, read 12,299,513 times
Reputation: 5233
Bretton Woods?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2014, 11:52 AM
 
Location: Old Bellevue, WA
18,782 posts, read 17,369,310 times
Reputation: 7990
The 91% tax rate was essentially a legal fiction that was paid by virtually no one paid. I'm not going to bother to repost the link from lib UC Berkeley econ profs, Saez and Piketty again, but you can find it via the search button.

Reagan talked about working in 1950's Hollywood when the 91% rate was in effect.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Age of Reagan
...highly paid actors frequently found that after making one or two movies they were in the 91 percent tax bracket. Why make another picture that year if you kept only 9 cents on the dollar? So, Reagan would say, they quit working every year by June and sat around the Brown Derby restaurant talking about oil deals
(The Age of Reagan by Steven Hayward, p. 67.)

Anyway the 91% rate was eliminated by JFK in the early 60's, on the grounds that it inhibited economic growth, which clearly it did. I suppose libs are going to say that was Reagan's fault, somehow.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2014, 11:55 AM
 
Location: Old Bellevue, WA
18,782 posts, read 17,369,310 times
Reputation: 7990
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrWillys View Post
I was hoping for intelligent responses and not generalizations.
Why not just say what you want to say instead of this game of "bait the CD poster?"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:08 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top