List of excuses for ‘the pause’ in global warming is now up to 52 (enemy, revolution)

[Roadking2003]

Originally Posted by eddie gein

I often wonder what the scientists think of all this. They are the ones that generate the data by experiment and observation. They are the ones who know the data. They are the ones that understand the data. And they have to put up with people who don't have a clue telling them that they are dishonest and unethical. I don't know how they tolerate such buffoonery.

And they are the ones who destroy the data and they are the ones who fudge the data, etc. And we have to pay these yahoos to play their climate prediction games.

[mm4]

Originally Posted by eddie gein

I often wonder what the scientists think of all this. They are the ones that generate the data by experiment and observation. They are the ones who know the data. They are the ones that understand the data.

Harvard report shines light on ex-researcher’s misconduct

Mike’s Nature Trick | Watts Up With That?

Doubts About Study of Gay Canvassers Rattle the Field

Imanishi-Kari case ends, but debate on scientific conduct continues

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_Jackson_Freeman_II

A Rogue's Gallery

[Spatula City]

Originally Posted by eddie gein

I don't know how they tolerate such buffoonery.

They don't have much of a choice. These people are professional propagandists who hide behind freedom of speech and know exactly how to manipulate their statements, laud certain conclusions, ridicule others and feed into the general paranoia about corruption and scandals. It doesn't help that their field is too complex for laymen to understand and they're fighting against liars who have 100s of different lies for every truth.

[sanspeur]

Originally Posted by mm4

They were admittedly making past 'science' off of datasets they now consider "incomplete"? (While making alarmist predictions from it, for years?) That's as convenient as the thermometers that were planted on heat islands. The data from East Anglia was so transparent too.

Here's more NOAA transparency:

_"NOAA Hoarding Key Data On Oil Spill Damage"_
NOAA Hoarding Key Data On Oil Spill Damage


Meanwhile the summertime afternoon temperature in Vancouver presently is a miserable 72° F, in Montreal, 66° F. Try to stay cool.

Poor effort.....The normal temperature for Vancouver for June 6 is 66* F.

[mm4]

Originally Posted by sanspeur

Poor effort.....The normal temperature for Vancouver for June 6 is 66* F.

Link?

[sanspeur]

Originally Posted by nicet4

But not the money.

When it comes to the envirowhacko money, graft and outright corruption Al Gore has always been at the top of his game.

Does'nt 1933 still hold the record for hottest year?

No, 2014 is the hottest year on record globally.

[mm4]

Originally Posted by sanspeur

No, 2014 is the hottest year on record globally.

That's not what the public experienced.

[sanspeur]

Originally Posted by mm4

Link?

Why not? Vancouver, BC - 7 Day Forecast - Environment Canada

[sanspeur]

Originally Posted by mm4

That's not what the public experienced.

That makes no sense.

[mm4]

Originally Posted by sanspeur

Why not? Vancouver, BC - 7 Day Forecast - Environment Canada

That's a +6° F deviation from the norm. At this rate the North Pole will be melted by tomorrow morning. Is there any way that you can quickly move to higher ground, and find a blast furnace suit?