Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-19-2015, 09:25 AM
 
Location: Portland, OR
8,802 posts, read 8,898,352 times
Reputation: 4512

Advertisements

why is a gap a bad thing in and of itself, and how will your policies address it? Not much of a twist, but still a question none of you can answer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-19-2015, 09:27 AM
 
34,619 posts, read 21,615,505 times
Reputation: 22232
It appears as though their candidates enjoy the perks of wealth inequality.

Hillary Clinton hides from reporters with SECOND secret party of the day | Daily Mail Online
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-19-2015, 09:29 AM
 
33,016 posts, read 27,458,643 times
Reputation: 9074
It's global and liberals can't do anything to stop it. The best they can do to make it easier for the poor to live on their pittances.

This would also promote inequality but it's probably the best the poor can hope for.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-19-2015, 09:37 AM
 
934 posts, read 595,497 times
Reputation: 326
I thought wealth was being redistributed to the poor??? Thats what conservatives have been whining about for years
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-19-2015, 09:37 AM
 
Location: Iowa, USA
6,542 posts, read 4,094,955 times
Reputation: 3806
Quote:
Originally Posted by VTHokieFan View Post
why is a gap a bad thing in and of itself, and how will your policies address it? Not much of a twist, but still a question none of you can answer.
How is that a twist at all? You just put twist in the title as clickbait.

Why is it bad that those who do all kinds of "lower level" work don't see their wealth increase while only the top of the big business do? Why do you think? If a company grows, it's not just the person on top who deserve some return on that.

Depends who's policy though. Democrats are politicians and can be bought, so there's not really a single solution that would work for each candidate. Even now, Obama's pushing form some pacific trade deal that only the legion of doom is allowed to read, and for some reason, that makes me think it will just lead to even more off shores manufacturing.

If it were up to me, end trade agreements as soon as possible, tax the living **** out of off shores operations, and incentivize opening up manufacturing jobs in the US. Add some regulations that require workers be paid their fair share (depends on the job) and make corporate donations to politicians a federal crime; I'd call it treason as manipulating the political system for personal gain is going against the country if you ask me. That charge would follow both the executives of the corporation and the politician accepting the bribes.

That would be step 1. Step 2 is dependent on how step 1 goes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-19-2015, 09:44 AM
 
33,016 posts, read 27,458,643 times
Reputation: 9074
Quote:
Originally Posted by blind melon View Post
I thought wealth was being redistributed to the poor??? Thats what conservatives have been whining about for years

Income is being redistributed to the poor. In turn, the poor spend it all, putting more wealth in the hands of the rich.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-19-2015, 09:47 AM
 
934 posts, read 595,497 times
Reputation: 326
Quote:
Originally Posted by freemkt View Post
Income is being redistributed to the poor. In turn, the poor spend it all, putting more wealth in the hands of the rich.
Thread title says income inequality is growing yet you claim imcome is being redistributed tonthe poor.

Makes no sense
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-19-2015, 09:48 AM
 
Location: Phoenix
30,370 posts, read 19,162,886 times
Reputation: 26262
Factors in income inequality in my opinion are:

1) The world economy including using robots and computers has reduced the number of manufacturing jobs which were the most number of middle class of jobs.
2) Excellence of certain US companies has created vast wealth for those able to tap into it.
3) A large immigrant (most illegals) has created an oversupply of labor in the unskilled and semi skilled area which is repressing wages for middle and lower class Americans.
4) Poor education in many US schools has not created the level of expertise many need to compete in the information knowledge based economy of today.
5) A favorable tax code to create wealth has allowed the top 10% to greatly increase wealth
6) The US minimum wage rate should be increased.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-19-2015, 10:24 AM
 
Location: Pacific NW
9,437 posts, read 7,369,351 times
Reputation: 7979
Quote:
Originally Posted by blind melon View Post
I thought wealth was being redistributed to the poor??? Thats what conservatives have been whining about for years
As usual for the left it's other peoples money. Even Hillarys charity keeps the vast majority of the money for themselves.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-19-2015, 10:39 AM
 
Location: Portland, OR
8,802 posts, read 8,898,352 times
Reputation: 4512
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tall Traveler View Post
Factors in income inequality in my opinion are:

1) The world economy including using robots and computers has reduced the number of manufacturing jobs which were the most number of middle class of jobs.
2) Excellence of certain US companies has created vast wealth for those able to tap into it.
3) A large immigrant (most illegals) has created an oversupply of labor in the unskilled and semi skilled area which is repressing wages for middle and lower class Americans.
4) Poor education in many US schools has not created the level of expertise many need to compete in the information knowledge based economy of today.
5) A favorable tax code to create wealth has allowed the top 10% to greatly increase wealth
6) The US minimum wage rate should be increased.
Do you think asset bubbles created by the federal reserve could have anything to do with wealth inequality given that most rich store their wealth in equities?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:57 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top