Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-25-2015, 11:25 AM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,731,596 times
Reputation: 20674

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by rbohm View Post
if he qualifies for disability, then he can also get on medicare.
Medicaid
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-25-2015, 11:27 AM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,731,596 times
Reputation: 20674
Quote:
Originally Posted by lilyflower3191981 View Post
I believe the patient can ask to speak with an oncology social worker or financial counselor at the facility that provided the diagnosis. These individuals should be able to guide you through the process of obtaining treatment.

You can set up payment plans, or negotiate a discounted payment with the treating facility.
Sometimes.

Most Cancer Treatment facilities require uninsured patients to pony up the cash in advance of treatment.

11/12 treatments are priced in excess of $100,000.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-25-2015, 04:15 PM
 
Location: USA
271 posts, read 384,257 times
Reputation: 153
Quote:
Originally Posted by ray1945 View Post
Really? What is your solution to a seriously ill person who cannot pay for his/her medical care? All the shoulda, woulda, coulda lectures are not going to make them better, so don't waste your breath. So, what do we do with people who will die without proper (sometimes, continuing) medical care, but cannot pay for it?
Very good question. The ACA has created an opportunity for almost anyone to buy insurance. The personal responsibility comes into play when a person uses the money that should be going to pay for premiums on something else for whatever reason.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-25-2015, 04:28 PM
 
Location: Living rent free in your head
42,850 posts, read 26,268,189 times
Reputation: 34058
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cameron60 View Post
Very good question. The ACA has created an opportunity for almost anyone to buy insurance. The personal responsibility comes into play when a person uses the money that should be going to pay for premiums on something else for whatever reason.
If a person has an adequate income, then I agree and the law penalizes them for not buying insurance, but what about a poor person who has no children and lives in a state without expanded medicaid, they should buy a policy instead of what, paying rent, eating?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-25-2015, 04:54 PM
 
Location: USA
271 posts, read 384,257 times
Reputation: 153
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2sleepy View Post
If a person has an adequate income, then I agree and the law penalizes them for not buying insurance, but what about a poor person who has no children and lives in a state without expanded medicaid, they should buy a policy instead of what, paying rent, eating?
As we discussed over poverty level income can buy you a plan for under 4% of income maybe as low as $5 a month. Non ACA Medicaid usually applies to single people under 65 who are not disabled or have yet to be approved for disability.
So that group of non disabled singles under age 65 who do not earn poverty level and do not have savings to buy a plan in the open market are the real denied group.
I guess there are people in that situation mostly in rural areas.
Is it that common? I really don't know.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-25-2015, 05:33 PM
 
Location: Living rent free in your head
42,850 posts, read 26,268,189 times
Reputation: 34058
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cameron60 View Post
As we discussed over poverty level income can buy you a plan for under 4% of income maybe as low as $5 a month. Non ACA Medicaid usually applies to single people under 65 who are not disabled or have yet to be approved for disability.
So that group of non disabled singles under age 65 who do not earn poverty level and do not have savings to buy a plan in the open market are the real denied group.
I guess there are people in that situation mostly in rural areas.
Is it that common? I really don't know.
According to this there are 8 million
But the Supreme Court’s ruling on the health care law last year, while upholding it, allowed states to choose whether to expand Medicaid. Those that opted not to leave about eight million uninsured people who live in poverty ($19,530 for a family of three) without any assistance at all.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/03/he...anted=all&_r=0
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-25-2015, 10:20 PM
 
6,993 posts, read 6,337,597 times
Reputation: 2824
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cameron60 View Post
Very good question. The ACA has created a opportunity for almost anyone to buy insurance. The personal responsibility comes into play when a person uses the money that should be going to pay for premiums on something else for whatever reason.
Shoulda, woulda, coulda - waste of breath. What is your solution to the problem of those who need life saving medical care but cannot pay for it? Do you just let them die?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-25-2015, 11:33 PM
 
Location: USA
271 posts, read 384,257 times
Reputation: 153
Quote:
Originally Posted by ray1945 View Post
Shoulda, woulda, coulda - waste of breath. What is your solution to the problem of those who need life saving medical care but cannot pay for it? Do you just let them die?
If they need help my vote is they should get it.
I do not have the solution as to where the money to pay for it comes from.
What do you suggest?
Politicians do things for power and money. I would like to know how we can change this.
Maybe you should ask the people why they vote for politicians that are against their own best interests.

Last edited by Cameron60; 05-25-2015 at 11:50 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2015, 12:18 AM
 
Location: Unperson Everyman Land
38,642 posts, read 26,374,838 times
Reputation: 12648
Quote:
Originally Posted by Floorist View Post
That's where people in Canada, France, or the UK are ahead. Their medical expenses are free.

Doesn`t do you any good if you die on a waiting list for "free" cancer treatment.

CARPE DIEM: US vs. Europe: Life Expectancy and Cancer Survival
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2015, 02:50 AM
 
91 posts, read 212,460 times
Reputation: 105
Its not free- The taxes are ridiculously high!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:01 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top