Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 06-05-2015, 12:08 PM
 
13,419 posts, read 9,950,386 times
Reputation: 14356

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tinawina View Post
If there is one thing that has disturbed me most about this whole thing is how far people will go to defend "their side" at all costs. Even for something like this.

The police reports are VERY clear. There is no ambiguity. In black and white, it states:

1. Jim Bob Duggar was first told of the molestation by ONE OF THE VICTIMS. Josh confessed it was true.
2. Later that year (after doing nothing other than talking to Josh about it) ONE OF THE VICTMS told the parents he did it again. Again Josh confesses, this time admitting to touching the 5 year old more than once. Parents handle it in-house. Josh is not removed from the home. No one gets counseling.
3. The following year a third victim comes forward to the parents (I believe this is the who was not his sister?) Family sends Josh to friend to do construction for 3 months. At this point he had been molesting young girls for OVER A YEAR. All of the girls are PRE-PUBESCENT.
4. The year after that they finally tell their church what happened. This means two years after this started they finally went outside the house for help. This is also the year their TV show premiered.
5. The year after THAT they take Josh to the "family friend" cop who gives Josh a stern taking too. They did not take him to the station and fill out a report. They called up a friend. No police report was filed. This is THREE YEARS after they were first told of Josh's problems. Apparently the behavior had not stopped if they felt the need to get someone to "sternly talk" to him.
6. At the four year mark the family is scheduled to appear on Oprah. Someone tips Oprah off that Josh is a molester. Oprah calls the cops and refuses to air the previously taped interview.
7. A first Daddy Duggar lawyers up and refuses to let Josh talk to the cops. Eventually the child services department takes over and Jim Bob lies that he got the kids counseling, which his wife rebuts later when interviewed alone. Since it's about 5 years later at this point and they can't get any proof that Josh has done anything within the last three years (really, this means one of the girls would have to have told on him) they have to close the case. But the records are not sealed because Josh in no longer a minor at this point plus no charges were filed. A second report is filed by a second law enforcement agency, and that one does not have to be legally sealed either.
8. Rumors swirl for years until In Touch requests the records through the Freedom of Information Act. The police chief checks with legal before he fills the request, gets the okay and gives them the file with the names redacted. He also notifies the family that the records have been requested. All hell breaks loose.


These people are blatantly lying about what happened. THEY LIED. It's all in the police report. They know the girls knew what happened (they did not "sleep through it" nor were they "too young to realize") The kids did not get counseling. Josh did not confess on his own. They did not willingly take him to the police. If he is now "cured" it is not due to any kind of interaction with anything close to a counselor certified in sex offenses. They knew the report was coming out. They knew the release of the report was legal. THEY ARE LYING. THEY ARE LYING ABOUT CHILD MOLESTATION IN ORDER TO PROTECT THE ABUSER AND THEMSELVES.

Yet, people are still out there defending these folks because "*******s" and "lena durham" and "anti Christians" and "gotcha media" whatever else. As if that changes any of the facts of this case! What happened happened and it is very hard to defend. What in the world are people thinking here? Are folks so blinded with hatred for the 'enemy' that you are willing to give a pass to.... THIS???? A teenager fingering little girls in their sleep (and there was at least once incident while the child was approached while awake and resisting, she was cornered in a laundry room) and his parents lying about it and y'all are fighting hard for their honor?

The same people doing this are the people who are (justifiably) incensed about left leaning people who ignore Bill Clinton's rape-y past. Just let that one marinate. You all just became what you hate.
Thank you Tina. If you want to defend the Duggars, start here and try it.

 
Old 06-05-2015, 12:10 PM
 
Location: 500 miles from home
33,942 posts, read 22,524,110 times
Reputation: 25816
Quote:
Originally Posted by sspistol View Post
Um, yes it was mentioned very specifically, RingoDoeBlow. They even speculated that the cop was trying to gain some points for early parole by discussing it with the press now. Did you even watch the interview RingoDoeBlow?

*See how stupid I look mocking your name? You should take note of that.
You DO know Ringo is not my real name, right? I take note of you calling yourself stupid.

Forgive me if I missed it - was it mentioned that this Officer was in jail for Child Porn? Cause I definitely missed THAT.

Do you believe that the Duggars went down the police station and 'just happened' to confess to Hutchins? That Hutchins just 'happened' to be the cop on duty?

Because that is what they said but that is not what the reports say.

Bottom line, pretty much no one believes that their televised attempt at whitewashing these 'incidents' is the truth.

Except those blinded by the fact that they portray a perfect Christian family on television.

That said, I think this family could recover - just not on television.

Maybe after a few years ~ we could expect a 'where are they now' kinda thing. But reality tv is simply not equipped for child molestation discussions. It is not a place for a family to heal. Mainly reality TV seems to tear families apart.
 
Old 06-05-2015, 12:44 PM
 
46,947 posts, read 25,984,404 times
Reputation: 29441
Quote:
Originally Posted by rigizug View Post
Actually in the interview, Jim Bob said he did not know the officer that was later charged with porn crime. He is not a friend. They just walked into the,police station and was given this officer to talk to. It seems very strange that with Jim Bob's connections he ended up with an officer he claims he did not know to discuss his son's molestion issues.
Jim Bob appears to have lied. I know, hard to believe, isn't it?

Quote:
Hutchens, now serving a 56-year prison sentence, told In Touch otherwise:

He said he knew Jim Bob well from his job and had even taught a couple of classes to car dealerships with him. In addition, Hutchens -– who was not promised anything in return for his interview and told only that it was part of an investigation -– said that Jim Bob specifically sought him out to talk to Josh.
Asked who initially contacted him for the meeting, Hutchens said: “Jim Bob did.” He then explained: “He called me by phone – he just said he needed to talk with me about a matter, he didn’t explain what he got there.” That interview was conducted before Jim Bob’s comments were aired.
In Touch Hits Back at Duggars: Releasing Records Was Legal, and BTW, You Lied a Lot | Mediaite

But I guess he'll repent and all will be well with the Lord again.
 
Old 06-05-2015, 01:56 PM
 
Location: Fairfield of the Ohio
774 posts, read 745,110 times
Reputation: 2425
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ringo1 View Post
You DO know Ringo is not my real name, right? I take note of you calling yourself stupid.

Forgive me if I missed it - was it mentioned that this Officer was in jail for Child Porn? Cause I definitely missed THAT.

Do you believe that the Duggars went down the police station and 'just happened' to confess to Hutchins? That Hutchins just 'happened' to be the cop on duty?

Because that is what they said but that is not what the reports say.

Bottom line, pretty much no one believes that their televised attempt at whitewashing these 'incidents' is the truth.

Except those blinded by the fact that they portray a perfect Christian family on television.

That said, I think this family could recover - just not on television.

Maybe after a few years ~ we could expect a 'where are they now' kinda thing. But reality tv is simply not equipped for child molestation discussions. It is not a place for a family to heal. Mainly reality TV seems to tear families apart.
You DO know that Jim Bob Duggar's name is not JimmyBimBob, right? I've made a note that you clearly missed the point.

Yes, it was mentioned that the Officer was in jail for child porn.

The report does not say that they came to see him specifically. It simply states that they he was the one they saw.

Another point, they clearly stated as does the report that Josh told them first. He came and confessed that the had touched his sisters while they slept as well as the baby sitter. At that point, they punished him, told the girls and put safe guards in place. After the girls were told to tell mom or dad if someone touched them to come tell them. That was when he touched the girl sitting in his lap under the blanket who immediately went and told Jim Bob. Then another girl told them that Josh had touched her in the laundry room. That was when they removed him from the home.

Do I think what Josh did was horrible? Yes. He molested 5 children when he was a child. All of the issues that I have are people who randomly make up stuff/extrapolate/arm chair diagnosis with zero facts or supporting evidence and present it as fact.

I believe this family WAS healed from the incidents over a dozen years ago. The healing that needs to be done now is because the press dug up something that should have NEVER been brought to light. All of the judgements made on these people are hella damaging to all of the kids and young adults.

I agree wholeheartedly that they shouldn't be on TV but for very different reasons than you.
 
Old 06-05-2015, 02:03 PM
 
6,319 posts, read 7,242,007 times
Reputation: 11987
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marlow View Post
The statute of limitations ran on those offenses.
I have a MAJOR ISSUE w Statute of Limitations.

So many child rapers running free because of it.

A crimes a crime and needs to be punished no matter how long has passed.

Also, child molestors don't just stop, so JD probably has other more recent victims.
 
Old 06-05-2015, 02:05 PM
 
Location: USA
7,474 posts, read 7,033,677 times
Reputation: 12513
Quote:
Originally Posted by SandyJet View Post
"Christian" is a code word for cults and kooky religions
The Duggar fiasco is also a prime example why people are leaving major religions - they are tired of this BS.

They are tired of hate-mongers spewing nonsense that either isn't in the Bible or is in a section that is full of nonsense (literal following of the Old Law, for example.)

They are tired of people using "JEEEEESUS forgives me!" as an excuse to get away with anything, apparently up to and including molesting children. Heck, Jesus may forgive, but even the Bible doesn't say you can be a total sociopath monster, and then give Jesus a high-five or attend one of his sermons and suddenly get off the hook - doubly so for the loons who don't even change their bad behavior and just "get saved" after ever crime.

They are tired of "Christian politicians" pushing everything from laws that punish people who are different to taking a stand against science. None of that is particularly religious, and it certainly is not a valid way to run a nation. But a certain percentage of the population will put up with any abuse, any crime, and any selling out of the American people provided the crook who does all this beats his chest and yells "JEEEESUS!!" enough times. Religion has become a literal "get out of jail free" card for crooks!

Just as normal Muslims don't want to be associated with the kinds that blow people up, normal Christians do not want to be associated with hate-mongering, hypocritical freaks like the Duggars and the politicians who protect them.
 
Old 06-05-2015, 02:06 PM
 
6,319 posts, read 7,242,007 times
Reputation: 11987
Quote:
Originally Posted by luzette View Post
thank you for this post! You're right on the mark, and this is the crux of what has been happening in the country for a very long time now. We need more normal christians to speak out against this fundamentalist strain that keeps trying to take over everything. I was raised christian myself so am not foreign to the faith. The duggars are not and never were "mainstream." what has finally come to light is the dark side of jim and michelle's sick twisting of biblical belief. These people are mentally ill and have needed help for a long time. It's just awful what they've done to their girls raising them to have no options other than marriage and non-stop baby making.
lol @ "normal christians"
 
Old 06-05-2015, 02:15 PM
 
6,129 posts, read 6,810,121 times
Reputation: 10821
Quote:
Originally Posted by sspistol View Post
The report does not say that they came to see him specifically. It simply states that they he was the one they saw.

Another point, (1)they clearly stated as does the report that Josh told them first. He came and confessed that the had touched his sisters while they slept as well as the baby sitter. At that point, they punished him, told the girls and put safe guards in place. After the girls were told to tell mom or dad if someone touched them to come tell them. That was when he touched the girl sitting in his lap under the blanket who immediately went and told Jim Bob. Then another girl told them that Josh had touched her in the laundry room. That was when they removed him from the home.

Do I think what Josh did was horrible? Yes. (2)He molested 5 children when he was a child. All of the issues that I have are people who randomly make up stuff/extrapolate/arm chair diagnosis with zero facts or supporting evidence and present it as fact.

I believe this family WAS healed from the incidents over a dozen years ago. The healing that needs to be done now is because the press dug up something that should have NEVER been brought to light. All of the judgements made on these people are hella damaging to all of the kids and young adults.

I agree wholeheartedly that they shouldn't be on TV but for very different reasons than you.

1. No, the report does not say anything about Josh telling them first. The report made it very clear one of the GIRLS told first that Josh had been coming in their room at night and touching their breasts and vaginas. The girls would be asleep when he would start and then someone would wake up and catch him. The oldest sister was 12 at the time and she was never touched. The children who WERE touched were 4, 8, 9, and 10 when this started.

2. He was not a child. He had just turned 14 when his father was altered to his behavior and 15/16 at the time he got told on for the THIRD time, and was finally send away to the family friend. The victims were children, he was a teen. 14 years olds can be charged as adults in some states, especially in cases involving a capitol offense. He was not a child.
 
Old 06-05-2015, 02:27 PM
 
Location: Fairfield of the Ohio
774 posts, read 745,110 times
Reputation: 2425
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tinawina View Post
1. No, the report does not say anything about Josh telling them first. The report made it very clear one of the GIRLS told first that Josh had been coming in their room at night and touching their breasts and vaginas. The girls would be asleep when he would start and then someone would wake up and catch him. The oldest sister was 12 at the time and she was never touched. The children who WERE touched were 4, 8, 9, and 10 when this started.

2. He was not a child. He had just turned 14 when his father was altered to his behavior and 15/16 at the time he got told on for the THIRD time, and was finally send away to the family friend. The victims were children, he was a teen. 14 years olds can be charged as adults in some states, especially in cases involving a capitol offense. He was not a child.
1. Yes, it does say that Josh told them first. The report is very clear that Josh came and told Jim Bob.
2. Yes, Josh was 14 when he alerted his father to what he had done. In my state, 14 is a child still.
 
Old 06-05-2015, 02:32 PM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,874,717 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tinawina View Post
If there is one thing that has disturbed me most about this whole thing is how far people will go to defend "their side" at all costs. Even for something like this.

The police reports are VERY clear. There is no ambiguity. In black and white, it states:

1. Jim Bob Duggar was first told of the molestation by ONE OF THE VICTIMS. Josh confessed it was true.
2. Later that year (after doing nothing other than talking to Josh about it) ONE OF THE VICTMS told the parents he did it again. Again Josh confesses, this time admitting to touching the 5 year old more than once. Parents handle it in-house. Josh is not removed from the home. No one gets counseling.
3. The following year a third victim comes forward to the parents (I believe this is the who was not his sister?) Family sends Josh to friend to do construction for 3 months. At this point he had been molesting young girls for OVER A YEAR. All of the girls are PRE-PUBESCENT.
4. The year after that they finally tell their church what happened. This means two years after this started they finally went outside the house for help. This is also the year their TV show premiered.
5. The year after THAT they take Josh to the "family friend" cop who gives Josh a stern taking too. They did not take him to the station and fill out a report. They called up a friend. No police report was filed. This is THREE YEARS after they were first told of Josh's problems. Apparently the behavior had not stopped if they felt the need to get someone to "sternly talk" to him.
6. At the four year mark the family is scheduled to appear on Oprah. Someone tips Oprah off that Josh is a molester. Oprah calls the cops and refuses to air the previously taped interview.
7. A first Daddy Duggar lawyers up and refuses to let Josh talk to the cops. Eventually the child services department takes over and Jim Bob lies that he got the kids counseling, which his wife rebuts later when interviewed alone. Since it's about 5 years later at this point and they can't get any proof that Josh has done anything within the last three years (really, this means one of the girls would have to have told on him) they have to close the case. But the records are not sealed because Josh in no longer a minor at this point plus no charges were filed. A second report is filed by a second law enforcement agency, and that one does not have to be legally sealed either.
8. Rumors swirl for years until In Touch requests the records through the Freedom of Information Act. The police chief checks with legal before he fills the request, gets the okay and gives them the file with the names redacted. He also notifies the family that the records have been requested. All hell breaks loose.


These people are blatantly lying about what happened. THEY LIED. It's all in the police report. They know the girls knew what happened (they did not "sleep through it" nor were they "too young to realize") The kids did not get counseling. Josh did not confess on his own. They did not willingly take him to the police. If he is now "cured" it is not due to any kind of interaction with anything close to a counselor certified in sex offenses. They knew the report was coming out. They knew the release of the report was legal. THEY ARE LYING. THEY ARE LYING ABOUT CHILD MOLESTATION IN ORDER TO PROTECT THE ABUSER AND THEMSELVES.

Yet, people are still out there defending these folks because "*******s" and "lena durham" and "anti Christians" and "gotcha media" whatever else. As if that changes any of the facts of this case! What happened happened and it is very hard to defend. What in the world are people thinking here? Are folks so blinded with hatred for the 'enemy' that you are willing to give a pass to.... THIS???? A teenager fingering little girls in their sleep (and there was at least once incident while the child was approached while awake and resisting, she was cornered in a laundry room) and his parents lying about it and y'all are fighting hard for their honor?

The same people doing this are the people who are (justifiably) incensed about left leaning people who ignore Bill Clinton's rape-y past. Just let that one marinate. You all just became what you hate.
You need to re-check your facts.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:32 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top