Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 05-22-2015, 01:52 PM
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,462 posts, read 16,420,257 times
Reputation: 5966

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rggr View Post
You're saying we're talking in circles and we are because you're second guessing the definition of "approved." If you're going to question definitions of simple terms, then there's no way to have a real discussion. Also, if you're defense hinges on questioning definitions of terms, you're probably in bad shape.
You said her email was never approved by the state Department i never disagreed with that, but you also didnt provide evidence to support your claim, i did however say that 4 years of a non dot.gov email address would suggest otherwise.

 
Old 05-22-2015, 01:55 PM
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,462 posts, read 16,420,257 times
Reputation: 5966
Quote:
Originally Posted by chucksnee View Post
I never claimed that document was a catch all.
I know you didnt, I said the other guy said it proved his point, and it didnt.



Quote:

Also, why are you avoiding the OPSEC rules and regulations? Do you really think OPSEC is 9 pages?
didnt avoid anythign, I said if you believe OpSec does prove your point, then post a copy of the Sec of State's and we can discuss it, to this point you havent responded to me, not the other way around.
 
Old 05-22-2015, 02:04 PM
 
4,571 posts, read 3,510,650 times
Reputation: 3261
Ooh, the resident cd hillbagger is trying to defend the indefensible. Always good for a chuckle.
 
Old 05-22-2015, 02:06 PM
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,462 posts, read 16,420,257 times
Reputation: 5966
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed from California View Post
Ooh, the resident cd hillbagger is trying to defend the indefensible. Always good for a chuckle.
we are 5 pages in and no one has posted anything that backs up the OP's argument including you
 
Old 05-22-2015, 02:38 PM
 
4,571 posts, read 3,510,650 times
Reputation: 3261
No, you simply don't want to believe the real truth about the old hag.
 
Old 05-22-2015, 02:41 PM
 
22,332 posts, read 11,861,882 times
Reputation: 20156
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsjj251 View Post
You do realize everything you said can be argued in the reverse right ????
The lengths you are going to defend what Hilary did...why? Are you on her payroll?
 
Old 05-22-2015, 02:44 PM
 
22,332 posts, read 11,861,882 times
Reputation: 20156
Quote:
Originally Posted by sxrckr View Post
It seems we may already have a Hillary 2016 operative here...
^So I'm not alone in thinking that!
 
Old 05-22-2015, 02:46 PM
 
625 posts, read 621,602 times
Reputation: 1761
I wouldn't trust Hillary as far as I could throw her.
 
Old 05-22-2015, 02:58 PM
 
3,557 posts, read 4,085,848 times
Reputation: 1632
She should pull a Jed Bartlett and just show up and demand to testify to an open committee. Then lets see Gowdy and clan squirm to try and make this seem like anything other than a politically motivated witchhunt.
 
Old 05-22-2015, 03:09 PM
 
6,500 posts, read 6,021,376 times
Reputation: 3601
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grsz11 View Post
She should pull a Jed Bartlett and just show up and demand to testify to an open committee. Then lets see Gowdy and clan squirm to try and make this seem like anything other than a politically motivated witchhunt.
Great. Would love to hear some answers from her on her "foundation" while were at it. That should be interesting. While were at it, maybe she can tell us more about how poor she is, was or whatever she was claiming before. Poor poor Hillary.....

Besides power, does anyone even know what she stands for and believes in? Her campaign just seems so odd as does her past. It seems like she's running because she thinks its entitled to her, like shes next in line or something. You hear from liberals and the silly college kids and even rappers, about how great she is and how much they like her, yet not many can even explain why they feel that way. At least with Obama, whether they admitted it or not we knew it was because he was black and gave good speeches. But with her....it just boggles the mind. They're voting for a name, nothing more.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top