Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-16-2015, 03:17 AM
 
25,024 posts, read 27,834,806 times
Reputation: 11790

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wayland Woman View Post
The Daily Mail is a puppet new organization from the UK. Hardly unbiased and Hillary throwing them off the bus was the right thing for her to do.
No self-respecting Brit reads the Daily Fail. Is it a coincidence that the only British media right-wing Americans read is Daily Mail? Nope, it's Fox News UK
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-16-2015, 04:07 AM
 
52,433 posts, read 26,432,550 times
Reputation: 21092
Quote:
Originally Posted by theunbrainwashed View Post
No self-respecting Brit reads the Daily Fail. Is it a coincidence that the only British media right-wing Americans read is Daily Mail? Nope, it's Fox News UK
One would think that if the Daily Mail is such an inconsequential paper, that King Hillary's people would have no issue with it them. But we know this isn't the case. There is this thing called reality and such commentary is only given to distract from real point. i.e. King Hillary wants to only talk to reporters who print what she says.

BTW, Daily Mail printed newspaper has a higher readership than NY Times. (by a significant amount)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2015, 05:13 AM
 
Location: Londonderry, NH
41,478 posts, read 59,599,064 times
Reputation: 24858
Daily Mail = NY Daily News = Waste of Paper

I was there at Ms. Clinton's speech last night in Manchester, NH. It was relatively moderate list of goals her administration intends to reach. I agree with most of them but doubt if they will ever be reached given the Republican and financial opposition.

I have not decided which Democrat to support during this primary. I do know that I will vote for a Democrat in the General Election because ALL of the Republicans and their policies are completely unacceptable for several reasons.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2015, 05:22 AM
 
11,086 posts, read 8,508,235 times
Reputation: 6392
Don't forget to bow.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2015, 06:23 AM
 
Location: Annandale, VA
5,094 posts, read 5,155,194 times
Reputation: 4231
Quote:
Originally Posted by JAMS14 View Post
Yeah, because listening to those "more experienced advisors" worked out so well for W.

We won't have a "glorified housewife with no experience" on the ticket, we'll have a former U.S. Senator and Secretary of State.

You have a "glorified housewife" who was given the title of "Senator" and "Sec of State" who accomplished nothing. Both jobs could have gone unfilled and no one would have noticed. Hillary was nothing but a "tourist". Without the name "Clinton" she would have never been considered. It was all her husband pulling strings for his wife.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2015, 06:55 AM
 
Location: Upstate NY 🇺🇸
36,754 posts, read 14,738,825 times
Reputation: 35584
King Hillary sets the rules, and the idea that people in a free country would accommodate this tyrant is laughable.

Deap-seated religious beliefs must change. Huh? No, they don't. And they won't.

Republicans don't care about our hard-working immigrants. They're here illegally. And don't even try comparing them to those who came (and continue to come) here legally.

Bill and I are very thankful for our success. OK, so it's the Wall St. boogeymen and greedy rich only when it's not the two of you. Your wealth (and that of your Hollyweird, business, and sports-world donors) is attributable to...success. Got it.

Republicans will take away your reproductive rights. Huh? You people have been saying this for decades. How? Because we don't want to pay for Sandra Fluke's recreational sex? Get specific. Oh wait. You can't.

Republicans turn their backs on gays. What? Stop playing to the uninformed around you and talk turkey. Are you referring to the definition of marriage (that you and Bill only recently changed your minds on)? Words do have meaning , you know. In fact, definitions exist not only to tell us what words mean, but what they don't mean.

*Sigh* The world is so simple when you're a liberal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2015, 07:56 AM
 
2,014 posts, read 1,522,600 times
Reputation: 1925
Quote:
Originally Posted by JAMS14 View Post
Yeah, because listening to those "more experienced advisors" worked out so well for W.

We won't have a "glorified housewife with no experience" on the ticket, we'll have a former U.S. Senator and Secretary of State.
Who screwed up by the number at every available opportunity, lied about pretty much every things she did, and then destroyed the records of her actions. All the while accepting millions of dollars in conflict of interest money. That's reassuring.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2015, 07:59 AM
 
2,014 posts, read 1,522,600 times
Reputation: 1925
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goinback2011 View Post
Don't forget to bow.
Bowing is not good enough. They have to lay face down on the floor and knock their forehead three times. But they are all more than happy to do it because they like being serfs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2015, 08:12 AM
 
14,293 posts, read 9,641,386 times
Reputation: 4254
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
A strong indication on the "transparency" of a future Hillary Clinton Administration. i.e. None

Hillary Clinton campaign denies access to DailyMail.com political editor as Monday's pool reporter in New Hampshire
The guy was a pool reporter, the other reporters trusted him to report truthfully on the event. So Hilary denied dozens of journalists and reporters.

A pool reporter represents all the other reporters who were not able to attend, if there is not enough space available for more than a few reporters, such as a small room or on an a business jet.

Pool reporters report on everything they see in great detail, since they never know what aspects and details of the event other reporters might want to do their stories about. They will describe in detail what people were wearing, who attended, every boring sorted detail, which allows other reporters to craft a unique story from other reporters, even though they all used the same pool reporter's notes.

The pool reporter cannot be biased and leave out the details of events, and choose to focus only on their own personal agenda, because the other reporters will complain and that reporter will never be a pool reporter again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2015, 08:17 AM
 
14,293 posts, read 9,641,386 times
Reputation: 4254
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wanderer0101 View Post
Who screwed up by the number at every available opportunity, lied about pretty much every things she did, and then destroyed the records of her actions. All the while accepting millions of dollars in conflict of interest money. That's reassuring.
Hilary was not just destroying Benghazi related emails, she was also deleting all the shady dealings and influence peddling, and funny money deals, not only for herself, but for Bill, Chelsea and anyone else that took part in their schemes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top