Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Thank goodness! I am so proud of him. As a Canadian this in my opinion is the most logical move I've ever seen a U.S president make. Great Job Obama! You're doing a fantastic job.
Thank goodness! I am so proud of him. As a Canadian this in my opinion is the most logical move I've ever seen a U.S president make. Great Job Obama! You're doing a fantastic job.
Lol wut?
A pointless/ineffective (and wrongheaded) stance is "doing a good job"?
Pointing out that the other party has all but completely de-funded mental healthcare in this country might actually lead to change.
In 2007, a gunman entered the New Life Church in Colorado Springs, CO shortly after the service let out and began shooting. He had expressed a desire to kill as many Christians as he could, and he was armed with several weapons to do just that. So what stopped him? One of the congregants was armed, and she shot back.
And yet, it sounds like our president wants to restrict the rights of good, law-abiding people to have that option, should they choose to exercise it. Why? Why does he want to restrict the most effective tool there is for the "good guys" to resist the evildoers in our midst? Why does he want to turn more people into defenseless victims?
Every year a couple dozen people are killed by crazed maniacs with legally owned guns. In some years, up to 50.
Every year, thousands of people are killed by illegal guns wielded by the criminals. The majority of these criminals are in the urban ghettos.
Obama is going after the wrong segment of the population. And he supports the wrong segment of the population when they are clearly in the wrong. He and the democrats that support him are out of control. Unfortunately, the Republicans are hardly much better.
the same people who will insist that all gun owners shouldn't be blamed fot a few nuts are quick to blame all black people for the riots in Baltimore and Ferguson. there should be a law that allows the father of Dylan Roof to be charged with a crime for buying his loser son a gun for his bday, if Roof was not legally allowed to buy one himself. no job? no car? he needs a gun!
the same people who will insist that all gun owners shouldn't be blamed fot a few nuts are quick to blame all black people for the riots in Baltimore and Ferguson. there should be a law that allows the father of Dylan Roof to be charged with a crime for buying his loser son a gun for his bday, if Roof was not legally allowed to buy one himself. no job? no car? he needs a gun!
I'd like his father to be charged for not taking that gun and blowing the head off his thug SOB son.
the same people who will insist that all gun owners shouldn't be blamed fot a few nuts are quick to blame all black people for the riots in Baltimore and Ferguson. there should be a law that allows the father of Dylan Roof to be charged with a crime for buying his loser son a gun for his bday, if Roof was not legally allowed to buy one himself. no job? no car? he needs a gun!
There might be (a law).
I once worked in a gun store and when a man came in to buy his wife a gun as a gift, the FFL dealer had both fill out the paper work. While it may be "legal" to buy a gun as a gift for someone (not being an FFL myself, I don't quite know how those rules run), these days, at least in these parts, we get nervous about anything that might be viewed as a strawman purchase.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.