Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 06-21-2015, 05:54 PM
 
4,571 posts, read 3,518,799 times
Reputation: 3261

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by mkpunk View Post
The problem is the whole good guy with a gun scenario is used when most incidents happen that a bad guy with a gun can be stopped with a good guy with a gun but we forget that most cases it is hard to tell if a good guy with a gun would truly stop an active shooter situation if all other variables were the same besides at the least one single gun owner.

I do think we need to restrict who can own guns, availability of guns and also magazine size. No reason to walk around as a civilian with a 30 round magazine.
Who says, you? A gunophobe?

 
Old 06-21-2015, 06:02 PM
 
Location: New York Area
34,994 posts, read 16,964,237 times
Reputation: 30099
Quote:
Originally Posted by chucksnee View Post
What others laws you you like to add that criminals will obey?
The idea of accountability laws is to create some responsibility for those who turn over guns to a madman.
 
Old 06-21-2015, 06:08 PM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,161,783 times
Reputation: 7875
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boris347 View Post
Of course it works. People are people, and the only difference in locations are the languages they speak. All are capable of the same crimes, and all commit the same crimes.

You say no one is going to take your guns, but you have been proven wrong by what happened durng Katrina. If its convenient, your Guns will be taken, and you will be left to protest it after the fact, when you have already lost them. Only a fool thinks Registration is for your own good.

As far as what you think, should you be held responsible if a car you owned is involved in a crime? Should you also go to jail? That's pretty absurd thinking.
I guess if you are trying to say that if gun smuggling was easy and unchecked, then sure, we are just like Mexico.

Actually if you give your car to someone who drunk drives in it, then yes, you should be held responsible for that action. I never loan my car out to people.

And again, no one is going to take away your guns. You can try to use the Katrina myth, but that was just a stupid cop that didn't know any better and had bad information.
 
Old 06-21-2015, 06:11 PM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,161,783 times
Reputation: 7875
Quote:
Originally Posted by gortamor View Post
Chicago does, and we see how well that works...
So does NYC, and yet they have low crime. If you are just expecting a simple answer for gun related crimes, then the bad news is that there is no simple action....other than sitting on your hands and sticking your head in the sand to pretend like there is nothing wrong and nothing we can do about it.
 
Old 06-21-2015, 06:35 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,227 posts, read 26,172,300 times
Reputation: 15620
Quote:
Originally Posted by stburr91 View Post

The NRA, and gun owners have always called for more enforcement of gun laws, so your statement doesn't hold up.
That's not true at all, they wouldn't even allow a director of the ATF and have done everything they can to circumvent the ATF whether limiting funding or blocking investigation.

Seems like it would be important to trace guns used in a crime back to dealers.



Quote:
Congress blacked out the information by passing the so-called Tiahrt amendment,
named for Rep. Todd Tiahrt (R-Kan.). The law removed from the public record a
government database that traces guns recovered in crimes back to the dealers.
Industry pressure hides gun traces, protects dealers from public scrutiny
 
Old 06-21-2015, 06:38 PM
 
Location: United States
12,390 posts, read 7,092,577 times
Reputation: 6135
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
So does NYC, and yet they have low crime. If you are just expecting a simple answer for gun related crimes, then the bad news is that there is no simple action....other than sitting on your hands and sticking your head in the sand to pretend like there is nothing wrong and nothing we can do about it.
Gun crime is at about a 30 year low throughout the entire country, not just NYC. NYC's overall crime reduction has much more to do with massive gentrification, than anything else.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
That's not true at all, they wouldn't even allow a director of the ATF and have done everything they can to circumvent the ATF whether limiting funding or blocking investigation.

The NRA has absolutely no control over the funding of the ATF, or over what it investigates. The ATF has gotten itself into hot water with congress many time all on it's own, with no NRA involvement.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
Seems like it would be important to trace guns used in a crime back to dealers.

Industry pressure hides gun traces, protects dealers from public scrutiny

So what? It only blocks the data from public assess, not law enforcement. Dealers still remain 100% criminally liable, and all sales records are still required to be turned in to the ATF for review.

The law is only there to offer some protection from people, or groups that are fishing for lawsuits.

Last edited by stburr91; 06-21-2015 at 06:57 PM..
 
Old 06-21-2015, 07:03 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,227 posts, read 26,172,300 times
Reputation: 15620
Quote:
Originally Posted by stburr91 View Post
Gun crime is at about a 30 year low throughout the entire country, not just NYC. NYC's overall crime reduction has much more to do with massive gentrification, than anything else.



So what? It only blocks the data from public assess, not law enforcement. Dealers still remain 100% criminally liable, and all sales records are still required to be turned in to the ATF for review.
Dealers are almost never prosecuted, lost "guns" that they are unable to account for go by the wayside, it would be nice to be able to trace a gun back to the source. The ATF is prohibited from even inspecting a dealership more than once a year, doesn't matter since they don't have the manpower, lucky if they can inspect within 5 years. Restricting the release to the public of information relative to guns used in a crime, what's the point. There is a small amount of dealers that are responsible for a large amount of illegal guns, they deserve to be under the microscope with no restrictions.

There are many reasons for the drop in NYC crime, stop & frisk, strict gun laws, gentrification is towards the bottom. A large majority of the guns used in a crime come from outside NYC, particularly GA, SC, VA.


Congress controls the ATF budget, hasn't changed much in 10 years, maybe they are influenced by the NRA.
 
Old 06-21-2015, 07:05 PM
 
Location: Lost in Texas
9,827 posts, read 6,932,912 times
Reputation: 3416
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
That's not true at all, they wouldn't even allow a director of the ATF and have done everything they can to circumvent the ATF whether limiting funding or blocking investigation.

Seems like it would be important to trace guns used in a crime back to dealers.






Industry pressure hides gun traces, protects dealers from public scrutiny
Would it also be important to trace guns smuggled into Mexico by our government to be traced back to their origin?
 
Old 06-21-2015, 07:15 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,227 posts, read 26,172,300 times
Reputation: 15620
Quote:
Originally Posted by freightshaker View Post
Would it also be important to trace guns smuggled into Mexico by our government to be traced back to their origin?
That was a big mistake to find out how the guns make it over the border to Mexico, what was that 200 guns? There are several thousand guns that end up in Mexico but the sting was poorly devised.

There are 200,000 guns lost or stolen per year, there are dealerships that can't account for several hundred guns that is more than F&F . That should be the focus, not a one time government action from several years ago.
 
Old 06-21-2015, 07:21 PM
 
Location: United States
12,390 posts, read 7,092,577 times
Reputation: 6135
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
Dealers are almost never prosecuted, lost "guns" that they are unable to account for go by the wayside, it would be nice to be able to trace a gun back to the source. The ATF is prohibited from even inspecting a dealership more than once a year, doesn't matter since they don't have the manpower, lucky if they can inspect within 5 years. Restricting the release to the public of information relative to guns used in a crime, what's the point. There is a small amount of dealers that are responsible for a large amount of illegal guns, they deserve to be under the microscope with no restrictions.

There are many reasons for the drop in NYC crime, stop & frisk, strict gun laws, gentrification is towards the bottom. A large majority of the guns used in a crime come from outside NYC, particularly GA, SC, VA.


Congress controls the ATF budget, hasn't changed much in 10 years, maybe they are influenced by the NRA.
There is absolutely no reason for gun owners, or the NRA to protect dealer that are providing guns to people that are prohibited from possessing them. In fact, there is every reason for gun owners, and the NRA to see these dealer prosecuted. Lower gun crime rates equals less pressure to ban guns, so the idea that gun owners, or the NRA would protect rouge dealers, simply defies any logic.

As to NYC, it's had strict anti-gun laws for a very long time now, long before it's more recent reduction in crime levels. Stop and frisk has been almost completely eliminated, yet crime is still down. The major gentrification in NYC correlates perfectly with the reduction in overall crime. To say gentrification isn't a major reason for the lower crime rates in NYC, is not being honest to say the least.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:24 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top