Seattle Mayor seeks to impose 'all gender' restrooms. (Murray, cost, states)

[wutitiz]

New law would require 'all-gender' bathroom facilities at Seattle businesses - Puget Sound Business Journal

It applies only to single-occupancy restrooms, so there is not much reason to object to this. But is this why Seattleites pay Mayor Murray $180,000/yr?

Seattle has a history of failed restroom initiatives. We had high-tech self-cleaning French restrooms that we bought for $5 million and auctioned of on ebay for $12,000 when they did not work out.
New law would require 'all-gender' bathroom facilities at Seattle businesses - Puget Sound Business Journal
City hopes eBay auction will shut the lid on toilet debacle - seattlepi.com

There was also a $4.2 million public restroom project at Mt. Rainier, just a few mile south of Seattle.
//www.city-data.com/forum/polit...on-toilet.html

[katzpaw]

"It applies only to single-occupancy restrooms"
Makes sense, the women's restroom often has a line-up while the guy's restroom is empty.
I can see women however not reacting well to the pee on the floor left by men in public restrooms.

[HappyTexan]

Just go to the bathroom before you leave the house and hold it until you get back home.

[Haakon]

Originally Posted by wutitiz

It applies only to single-occupancy restrooms, so there is not much reason to object to this. But is this why Seattleites pay Mayor Murray $180,000/yr?

Of course not! Don't forget he also had the crosswalks painted rainbows, because Seattle doesn't have any other problems to deal with. Mayor Murray unveils rainbow crosswalks on Capitol Hill | www.kirotv.com

[HappyTexan]

It's so much easier to just deal with social issues. The Progressives are all about quality of life.

[urbanlife78]

I thought all single occupancy bathrooms were all gender.

[katzpaw]

Originally Posted by urbanlife78

I thought all single occupancy bathrooms were all gender.

In my experience there is often 1 for men and 1 for women.

[workingclasshero]

Originally Posted by wutitiz

It applies only to single-occupancy restrooms,

so the mental illness of libberals

so more cost of ADDING a both gender SINGLE bath when most businesses already have separated baths that ''usually'' have more than one stall

more costs because of SH/SA(sexual harassment/sexual attack) lawsuits

[HappyTexan]

Originally Posted by urbanlife78

I thought all single occupancy bathrooms were all gender.

LOL..have you not been looking at the signs before entering them ?

Maybe you've been ahead of the times.

[katzpaw]

Originally Posted by workingclasshero

so the mental illness of libberals

so more cost of ADDING a both gender SINGLE bath when most businesses already have separated baths that ''usually'' have more than one stall

more costs because of SH/SA(sexual harassment/sexual attack) lawsuits

There is no requirement to ADD a single occupancy restroom. The only expense is changing the sign on the door of single occupancy restrooms from Male or Female to both.