Quote:
Originally Posted by tickyul
I don't know how cool I am with lifetime-appointments when it comes to SCOTUS.
Seems like we need a review-board to review SCOTUS.......if they are doing things clearly ILLEGAL or OVERSTEPPING their boundaries/legal-powers, they should be removed.
|
Idea behind lifetime appointments was in theory supposed to prevent SCOTUS justices from being unduly influenced. That is as with some local judges knowing soon they must run for re-election or up for re-appointment *may* cloud some of their decisions.
You also don't want to give this or that administration too much influence by being able to pack the SC say if several vacancies came at once.
As one has said repeatedly; immunity from any adverse affects relating to their decisions means the SC can act in a manner that delivers "impartial" justice. People may not always agree with their reasoning but there you are....