Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-07-2015, 06:06 PM
 
1,603 posts, read 1,113,193 times
Reputation: 1175

Advertisements

Feds Discover Their Own Aid Is To Blame For Rising Tuition

Quote:
A new report by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York has found that the massive investment in grants and student loans by the federal government is a major contributor to the unbridled growth in the cost of attending college.

College tuition rates have consistently risen faster than inflation for some 25 years. One theory for the rise, dubbed the “Bennett hypothesis,” was put forward by Ronald Reagan secretary of education William Bennett, who argued that hikes in government student aid simply gave colleges a free pass to hike tuition.


Now, the New York Fed’s research suggests there’s some merit to the idea, and that it means the government could be spending billions on education to no effect.

“While one would expect a student aid expansion to benefit recipients, the subsidized loan expansion could have been to their detriment, on net, because of the sizable and offsetting tuition effect,” the paper concludes.

On average, the report finds, each additional dollar in government financial aid translated to a tuition hike of about 65 percent. That indicates that the biggest direct beneficiaries of federal aid are schools, rather than the students hoping to attend them.
Government creates and exacerbates problems.

Let the market and competition decide tuition and watch it plummet.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-08-2015, 06:58 AM
 
Location: My beloved Bluegrass
20,126 posts, read 16,153,979 times
Reputation: 28335
No surprise, really. We watched the same thing happen with orthodontics in California when Medicaide starting covering basically cosmetic braces. Within 5 years the costs rose there at a significantly higher rate than the rest of the nation and it became almost double the cost than in other states.
__________________
When I post in bold red that is moderator action and, per the TOS, can only be discussed through Direct Message.Moderator - Diabetes and Kentucky (including Lexington & Louisville)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2015, 07:02 AM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,373,658 times
Reputation: 40731
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldhag1 View Post
No surprise, really. We watched the same thing happen with orthodontics in California when Medicaide starting covering basically cosmetic braces. Within 5 years the costs rose there at a significantly higher rate than the rest of the nation and it became almost double the cost than in other states.
Seems like we've been watching a similar rise in the defense budget and the cost of implements of war also.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2015, 12:01 PM
jw2
 
2,028 posts, read 3,265,760 times
Reputation: 3387
This is not only true for subsidized education but everything the government subsidizes. I was involved in another (private) study that came to the same conclusion on long-term transient housing (rental) prices. The more the government subsidized the bottom of the market, the more prices rose for everybody. Since the bottom is largely subsidized and the rich are doing just fine, the impact is mostly felt by the middle class.

Perhaps the studies should concentrate on why we continue the same policies when they have been shown to fail. Or better yet, how have we been able to convince a nation that the rich are the cause of our middle class problems when it is the government all along.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2015, 12:06 PM
 
Location: Maryland
7,812 posts, read 6,389,895 times
Reputation: 9971
If I had a business and someone was giving out loans to people wanting to buy my product, I'd jack up the prices to whatever I could get away with.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2015, 12:08 PM
Status: "Apparently the worst poster on CD" (set 25 days ago)
 
27,640 posts, read 16,125,463 times
Reputation: 19049
Yes shocking.. pft.. "feds discover" more pft...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2015, 12:38 PM
 
20,458 posts, read 12,378,099 times
Reputation: 10251
yet another thread that proves government is not the solution. Government is the problem
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2015, 12:43 PM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,725,169 times
Reputation: 20674
How is it that many countries offer very good college educations at nominal cost to the people, manage to do so?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2015, 12:48 PM
 
20,458 posts, read 12,378,099 times
Reputation: 10251
Quote:
Originally Posted by middle-aged mom View Post
How is it that many countries offer very good college educations at nominal cost to the people, manage to do so?
they direct people from a very early age toward types of education that the government decides they would be best at?

they spent the cold war letting the United States fund the defense against the USSR ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2015, 12:50 PM
 
41,110 posts, read 25,727,707 times
Reputation: 13868
Quote:
Originally Posted by jw2 View Post
This is not only true for subsidized education but everything the government subsidizes. I was involved in another (private) study that came to the same conclusion on long-term transient housing (rental) prices. The more the government subsidized the bottom of the market, the more prices rose for everybody. Since the bottom is largely subsidized and the rich are doing just fine, the impact is mostly felt by the middle class.

Perhaps the studies should concentrate on why we continue the same policies when they have been shown to fail. Or better yet, how have we been able to convince a nation that the rich are the cause of our middle class problems when it is the government all along.
Proof is there before them and they will still deny it.

Government Subsidizes in the name of helping the poor ---> Boom (now the middle class can't afford it)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:45 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top