Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-14-2015, 07:46 AM
 
78,409 posts, read 60,579,949 times
Reputation: 49689

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by florida.bob View Post
Is this like the time when Carter\Clinton negotiated the end of the North Korean nuclear program?

Or like the time when Bush landed all "Mission Accomplished" on an aircraft carrier?

I guess we should just fire up the Nobel Peace Prize for Kerry this time since Carter got one and Obama got one.....lmfao....I guess they should have given Bush one too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-14-2015, 08:27 AM
 
Location: Austin
15,632 posts, read 10,388,492 times
Reputation: 19524
"Back in 1994, American negotiators promised a “good deal” with North Korea. Its nuclear plants were supposed to be frozen and dismantled. International inspectors would “carefully monitor” North Korea’s compliance with the agreement and ensure the country’s return to the “community of nations.” The world, we were told, would be a safer place.

It wasn’t. North Korea never forfeited its nuclear plants and the inspections proved useless. The community of nations is threatened by North Korean atomic bombs and the world is anything but safe. And yet, against all logic, a very similar deal has been signed with Iran.

And Iran is not North Korea. It’s far worse. Pyonyang’s dictators never plotted terrorist attacks across five continents and in thirty cities, including Washington, D.C. Tehran’s Ayatollahs did."

North Korea is not actively undermining pro-Western governments in its region or planting agents in South America. Iran is."

http://time.com/3956853/iran-michael-oren-israel/

Just last week, Iran’s President attended a rally in Tehran where tens of thousands of protesters chanted “Death to America.” How stupid can Obama be to trust these people?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-14-2015, 08:40 AM
 
Location: World
4,204 posts, read 4,689,076 times
Reputation: 2841
What are the long term benefits of this deal with Iran for US?

1) Low oil prices. Surely Average American families will benefit from lower gas prices.

2) A new market for American Big Business in Iran.

3) It may trigger an Arms Race in the region. Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Oman, Bahrain, UAE, Kuwait, Turkey, Egypt will buy more Military Hardware from American manufacturers.

4) A new ally for ongoing fight in Iraq. They will even send their troops if situation goes out of hand there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-14-2015, 09:26 AM
 
Location: New York Area
35,064 posts, read 17,006,525 times
Reputation: 30213
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrClose View Post
Let me sum up the agreement so far.

The U.S. unfroze all assets and even gave Iran more money.
They also allowed them nuclear technology.

In return the Iranians promised to hate Americans and still wage war against Israel and expand their aggression against the west and the world.
Got it.

There will be no inspections and Iran will be on the human rights council in the UN condemning the U.S. for abuse as they murder millions in their quest for world domination.

Boehner and McConnell will push this through congress for obama.

In the end the world will be one more step toward another world war with obama's blessings.
(Stolen from my friend .. samspade)
I agree with your summary. It's all give and no take. The apparent "concessions" by Iran are eyewash.

My own instinct is that Israel will not just sit there and watch this play out. They may not bomb the reactors. But watch for members of the Supreme Cultural Revolution Council (SCRC, also known as the Supreme Council of Cultural Revolution) (link) and possibly Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei, Leader of the Islamic Revolution(link) to serve terms for a length determined by the IDF.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-14-2015, 09:31 AM
 
Location: New York Area
35,064 posts, read 17,006,525 times
Reputation: 30213
Quote:
Originally Posted by texan2yankee View Post
"Back in 1994, American negotiators promised a “good deal” with North Korea. Its nuclear plants were supposed to be frozen and dismantled. International inspectors would “carefully monitor” North Korea’s compliance with the agreement and ensure the country’s return to the “community of nations.” The world, we were told, would be a safer place.

It wasn’t. North Korea never forfeited its nuclear plants and the inspections proved useless. The community of nations is threatened by North Korean atomic bombs and the world is anything but safe. And yet, against all logic, a very similar deal has been signed with Iran.

And Iran is not North Korea. It’s far worse. Pyonyang’s dictators never plotted terrorist attacks across five continents and in thirty cities, including Washington, D.C. Tehran’s Ayatollahs did."

North Korea is not actively undermining pro-Western governments in its region or planting agents in South America. Iran is."

Michael Oren: Why Israel Won't Be Celebrating the Iran Deal

Just last week, Iran’s President attended a rally in Tehran where tens of thousands of protesters chanted “Death to America.” How stupid can Obama be to trust these people?
Appeasement is always a bad idea. It does two things:

  1. It makes your allies queasy and likely to take unilateral action to protect their interests; and
  2. Advances the interests of the enemy.

In my opinion Obama is adhering to our enemies, while giving them aid and comfort.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-14-2015, 09:33 AM
 
Location: U.S.
9,510 posts, read 9,085,701 times
Reputation: 5927
Now that an equal deal benefiting all parties equally, is Israel pleased with the results of this deal?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-14-2015, 09:44 AM
 
2,385 posts, read 1,587,465 times
Reputation: 923
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbgusa View Post
Appeasement is always a bad idea. It does two things:

  1. It makes your allies queasy and likely to take unilateral action to protect their interests; and
  2. Advances the interests of the enemy.

In my opinion Obama is adhering to our enemies, while giving them aid and comfort.
What about our European allies? They were all for the deal. Heck, the Germans couldn't wait to get this done.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-14-2015, 09:45 AM
 
Location: Long Island
57,271 posts, read 26,199,434 times
Reputation: 15640
Quote:
Originally Posted by texan2yankee View Post
"Back in 1994, American negotiators promised a “good deal” with North Korea. Its nuclear plants were supposed to be frozen and dismantled. International inspectors would “carefully monitor” North Korea’s compliance with the agreement and ensure the country’s return to the “community of nations.” The world, we were told, would be a safer place.

It wasn’t. North Korea never forfeited its nuclear plants and the inspections proved useless. The community of nations is threatened by North Korean atomic bombs and the world is anything but safe. And yet, against all logic, a very similar deal has been signed with Iran.

And Iran is not North Korea. It’s far worse. Pyonyang’s dictators never plotted terrorist attacks across five continents and in thirty cities, including Washington, D.C. Tehran’s Ayatollahs did."

North Korea is not actively undermining pro-Western governments in its region or planting agents in South America. Iran is."

Michael Oren: Why Israel Won't Be Celebrating the Iran Deal

Just last week, Iran’s President attended a rally in Tehran where tens of thousands of protesters chanted “Death to America.” How stupid can Obama be to trust these people?

North Korea is a terrible comparison, they are ruled by a ruthless dictator that regularly kills off it's leaders and would rather see it's people starve to death than give up military capability. Iran is one of the most educated countries in the ME but they do still answer to the Ayatollah. The right wing in Iran in this deal agree with the right wing in the US, they would love to see this fail.

Always better to make attempts at peace rather than more of the same, if we had never lifted a finger to negotiate with North Korea we would be not worse off than today.

This is not perfect and there is concern but the perfect deal does not exist.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-14-2015, 09:47 AM
 
Location: Long Island
57,271 posts, read 26,199,434 times
Reputation: 15640
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbgusa View Post
I agree with your summary. It's all give and no take. The apparent "concessions" by Iran are eyewash.

My own instinct is that Israel will not just sit there and watch this play out. They may not bomb the reactors. But watch for members of the Supreme Cultural Revolution Council (SCRC, also known as the Supreme Council of Cultural Revolution) (link) and possibly Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei, Leader of the Islamic Revolution(link) to serve terms for a length determined by the IDF.
If Israel takes action they will be held responsible by all the countries that negotiated this deal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-14-2015, 09:47 AM
 
Location: Baltimore
2,423 posts, read 2,092,523 times
Reputation: 767
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
North Korea is a terrible comparison, they are ruled by a ruthless dictator that regularly kills off it's leaders and would rather see it's people starve to death than give up military capability. Iran is one of the most educated countries in the ME but they do still answer to the Ayatollah. The right wing in Iran in this deal agree with the right wing in the US, they would love to see this fail.

Always better to make attempts at peace rather than more of the same, if we had never lifted a finger to negotiate with North Korea we would be not worse off than today.

This is not perfect and there is concern but the perfect deal does not exist.
Iran is just as ruthless and a terror sponsor. Iran's goals are to take over the region.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:23 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top