Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Is a 24 DAY Advanced Notification of Inspections in Iran Worrisome?
Yes 24 Days of Advanced Notification is WORRISOME and I oppose Obama 20 64.52%
Yes 24 Days of Advanced Notification is WORRISOME and I am neutral on Obama 3 9.68%
Yes 24 Days of Advanced Notification is WORRISOME and I support Obama 1 3.23%
No 24 Days of Advanced Notification is not a big deal and I oppose Obama 0 0%
No 24 Days of Advanced Notification is not a big deal and I am neutral on Obama 3 9.68%
No 24 Days of Advanced Notification is not a big deal and I support Obama 4 12.90%
Voters: 31. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-17-2015, 08:24 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,232 posts, read 26,172,300 times
Reputation: 15621

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainrose View Post
Can someone explain why these other countries went along with this deal?
Do they make a lot money from the sanctions being lifted?
Thanks
They don't want Iran to have nuclear capability.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-17-2015, 08:26 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,232 posts, read 26,172,300 times
Reputation: 15621
Quote:
Originally Posted by jojajn View Post
According to Ernest Moniz, United States Secretary of Energy, 24 days is adequate. I think this man knows more about this than anyone here or Nutandyahoo does.





His appointment was confirmed by the Senate in a unanimous vote on May 16, 2013
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ernest_Moniz

Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz talks Iran deal details with Rachel Maddow | MSNBC
I'm going with Tom Cotton, what does Ernest Moniz know. It would be nice if they actually read the agreement before they criticized it but that would require reading.

Quote:
Cotton wasn’t the first Senate Republican to attack the deal before all details
could be thoroughly reviewed and assessed. Nebraska Sen. Ben Sasse released one
of the earliest and direst assessments: “Sadly, the Administration just lit the
fuse for a nuclear arms race in the Middle East.”

http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slate...kill_iran.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:13 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top