Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
No, I don't see why you would associate Obama with 2 drug dealers that robbed and killed 2 of their customers. Just because they share the same skin color does not make them the same people. I hope you understand that?
These 2 criminals are going to prison for the rest of their lives with no chance of parole. In other words, they are being appropriately punished. Obama and Holder spoke out in situations where there was no punishment and racism was a factor or could be strongly argued. The news reel did not mention the criminals killing these young men b/c they were White. It sounds like a drug deal gone bad but I don't know what happened b/c I was not a juror.
If you run over and kill a Black 10 year old girl in your car b/c you are busy texting and didn't see her - that is not a hate crime. However, if you are driving your car and see a 10 year old Black girl and scream, "White Power - n$ggers need to die. I hate you people" and then run her over and kill her. THAT is what I'd call a hate crime. In your examples, Obama is commenting on the second example.
As for your assertion that Obama is only looking out for his own people (completely ridiculous). Let's say you are correct. If you are turning into jello b/c this, in your mind, has been happening for 6 years - maybe, just maybe you can understand how Black people feel after they've endured it for over 300 years.
Have a good day!!!
Obama has no people as he is not African American in the classic sense; Obama is a mulatto and not a descendant of slaves, what a true AA is. His father may be African but that doesn't put the moniker of brother on him though he will wear it to suit his agenda. He is white as he is black. He lived a life of white privilege, I am white and don't know what it is. How else do you explain attending a nice HS in Hawaii and choice universities on the mainland? He never mentions student debt so I doubt there was any. Then again....what do we really know about the guy?
Do you truly think Obama understands how black people feel after white liberals have convinced them they have been wronged for a million years?
Again; he isn't African American. Any who think he is are fooling themselves.
You know, it is funny how those of you who probably watch MSNBC or read Salon/The Nation, etc. think. I believe you really do not see why those of us who associate Obama to these racial incidents make our case. Granted some of you will be intentionally obtuse, but others are probably
Newsflash: Obama and Holder have both injected themselves into local police matters when it has come to race, yet ignored other situations with greater reasons to be outraged. They have both spoke with passion when it comes to "their people", and have typically "acted stupidly" before all the facts are in on the cases, showing how wrong their initial assumptions were.
So here is a quick breakdown since you do not watch FOX News.
Professor Gates - "acted stupidly"
Black Panthers - no prosecution on a slam dunk case
Trayvon Martin - "if I had a son"
NAACP speech - with "my people"
Michael Brown - "hands up don't shoot"
We dont see it because your arguments dont make sense, look at the incidents you used as examples.
Skip gates was within his own home and accused of trespassing/breaking and entering.
The Black Panther Incident happened in 2008, before Eric Holder ever took office.
Trayvon Martin was indeed innocent of the crime ZImmerman accused him of and Zimmerman himself admitted to engaging with the 17 year old boy. If self defense argument was basically, "I am losing a fight that I started, so I have a right to meet force with force".
I have no idea what you mean by "my people" and NAACP speech.
And Barack Obama has never said Hands up dont shoot as far as I know.
Quote:
The list goes on, but you get the point.
It is almost as if anything related to blacks will be seized upon by Obama & Co, and it might be in part because of the fact Obama turns to a known racist in Al Sharpton who as visited the WH close to 100 times now.
You think Sharpton is a racist, i do to( more so when it comes to Jewish people than white), We can agree that he shouldnt be visiting the white House, but the overall argument you are making here has no merit because you havent provided an example of a situation similar to the ones above, and even those were bad examples on your part.
Quote:
Many of us are also disgusted with how he disregards patriotism (no red/white /blue on the WH for the 4th), yet revels in things like homosexual marriage (WH bathed in homo flag colors).
The White House holds a fireworks display, barbecue,and concert on the 4th of July with military families. your argument doesnt hold water when put into context.
Quote:
Fort Hood was an Islamic terrorist attack, yet he/Holder classifies it as workplace violence.
Holder didnt classify anything, the military did. If you want to argue some greater military and government conspiracy, then fine,but it is just that, a conspiracy, with no proof.
Quote:
When blacks are killed seemingly due to racism he and/or Holder get all involved. Yet if whites are killed for racist reasons,,,crickets. That is especially true of attacks on people in the name of Islam. Like the poor woman who was decapitated at work with a 2nd victim in the process of having her head sawed off if not for someone with a gun shooting him. Again crickets.
Show me one case where the assumed racial kill was set free or never arrested and you will have a point.
Quote:
Our soldiers are murdered by a Muslim terrorist on American soil, yet the flag is not lowered to half staff.
I honestly feel this is fake outrage, No one cared about this until right wing media started talking about it. further more, flags were flown at half staff after Fort Hood, so this isnt something to get mad over in the sense you are claiming.
Quote:
For a criminal who attacked a LEO and is then killed in self defense, Obama sends his people to the funeral, speaks to the family, makes a public speech, and has Holder use the JD to investigate.
Yet when an innocent girl is gunned down by an illegal criminal alien due to policies he and many liberal (D's) endorse, none of the above occurs. WHY???
Because the guy who killed the girl you are talking about was immediately arrested. He didnt claim it was self defense.
Quote:
Again the list could go on and on, but I am running out of time. I am also wondering if all this is just going into one ear and out the other because you might be a koolaid drinking apologist for any and everything Obama does?
You started your post off by saying others my honestly not see why you are upset, but it is clear you cant differentiate between a crime were the criminal is arrested and one where another person walks free. do you honestly not see the difference between the cases you are discussing ?
We dont see it because your arguments dont make sense, look at the incidents you used as examples.
Skip gates was within his own home and accused of trespassing/breaking and entering.
The Black Panther Incident happened in 2008, before Eric Holder ever took office.
Trayvon Martin was indeed innocent of the crime ZImmerman accused him of and Zimmerman himself admitted to engaging with the 17 year old boy. If self defense argument was basically, "I am losing a fight that I started, so I have a right to meet force with force".
I have no idea what you mean by "my people" and NAACP speech.
And Barack Obama has never said Hands up dont shoot as far as I know.
The op obviously wanted to highlight a video of a black murderer of 2 white men using slogans about cops killing blacks. Like he just randomly came upon a 6 month old video, relating to a crime that happened 3 years ago. You never can have too many black crime against whites or cop brutality against blacks threads, but at least they can try to be more up to date. As for your defense of Obama/Holder...,
You mislead --- Holder was AG and responsible for the decision not to prosecute the BPP. And ignore context --- Police were called to the home as a possible burglary. A little cooperation by Gates and it's settled, but oh no, the big shot used the up yours attitude. Then when asked, Obama starts with y
"I don't know, not having been there and not seeing all the facts, ..." what role race played in that.
Could he then shut up on what was purely a local issue ? Nope, he couldn't resist jabbing the cops, 'acted stupidly', and implying racism was indeed the reason.
Your other defenses fall into those or their own special categories [Trayvon Martin is your spinny view], but no sense going through them all.
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,271 posts, read 53,985,563 times
Reputation: 40551
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vector1
Ah, more of the false narratives being repeated by Obama sons.
One wonders if they were also brought up on so called "hate crime" charges?
No wait, Holder would want to prosecute "his people" for such things.
More racial animus thanks to Obama & Co., the most divisive president in my lifetime. I guess this what was meant by our "post racial president".
The false narrative here is the implication this man represents the entire black race. I guess if he does you must surely believe the Charleston church shooter represents the entire white race, eh?
I stand by what I said. It is ludicrous that anyone would think that Obama is only looking out for Blacks. No explanation is needed. It is just silly.
As for White presidents not looking out for the welfare of ALL is part of our history. It is what it is. Writing a few sentences cannot help a lifetime of missed education. Sorry.
This case has nothing to do with Obama or Holder. Period. Your last paragraph about commuting jail sentences also has nothing to do with this case. I saw that someone already started a topic on this issue. I suggest you bring your concerns there.
This criminal should have apologized to the family but he did not. His outburst was not appropriate. But, more importantly, I believe the affected families have forgiven him. THEIR opinions are more important to me. These guys will rot in jail. No need to give them notoriety.
Some of what you said is opinion which we are all entitled to. However other things are either inaccurate, or as you would put it, "ludicrous".
Once and for all, I never said or implied Obama & Co ONLY look out for blacks. Rather I said and implied Obama & Holder favor blacks, and are more passionate about issues of blacks more so that I can ever remember.
Yet you again turn right around and either say and/or imply that white presidents have not looked out for all citizens. Even back in the day of slavery that would not be accurate across the board. However certainly in modern times, white presidents have certainly looked out for everyone as best as they could or were able to.
Again, you cannot have your cake and eat it to.
Regarding the commuting of sentences, it relates in so much as me making my point about Obama & Holder going out of their way address the interest of "their people". If you do not understand why I keep mentioning that, start watching and reading some other news sources other than liberal ones.
Had a white president or AG ever said even 1/8 of the racially charged things Obama/Holder did, it would have been a never ending reporting session on how racist they are. Yet Holder and Obama have been not held to the same standard. So it is up to others, such as myself to point out the hypocrisy and even bias, if not racism on their part.
The only thing we agree on is not giving the scum notoriety. However it has to be consistent. The news media cannot be allowed to take criminals and create false narratives like hands up, don't shoot and black lives matter to turn it into a ratings bonanza for 3 weeks. Yet ignore racial aspects of scum like these which obviously bought into those same false narratives. In that one losers mind, he somehow does not see the evil he perpetrated, and instead tries to conflate blacks that were killed (some justifiably) with his torture and killing of white kids.
Why you and some others cannot see the connection is beyond me.
The false narrative here is the implication this man represents the entire black race. I guess if he does you must surely believe the Charleston church shooter represents the entire white race, eh?
Hello, McFly, anyone home???
I have spoken out on CD many times about how the good people trapped in the slums with these scumbags are victims as well. Never once have I ever implied that all blacks, or even a majority of them are evil maggots like these two.
Still that does not preclude me from pointing out the hypocrisy/bias of the media or that of Obama & Co.
It also does not keep me from wondering how so many regular black folks can be suckered into these false narratives by the race/grievance merchants like Sharpton.
As to the maggot who killed the worshipers in Charleston (thanks for not mentioning his name), he belongs in a special place in Hell when judgment day comes. His racial sickness should be pointed out, but not if the same does not happen when minorities kill with sick racial hatred in their hearts. It is either all or nothing, no in between.
These evil people must be treated equally as far as public opinion goes. Since I believe in the death penalty, I hope this loser gets fried so he can get an early start on eternal damnation.
`
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.