Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
And Obama went golfing after an american had his throat slit
Which one would you rather have protecting you
Cheney shot Harry Whittington in the face--and it was Whittington who apologized. In fact the former laughed about it later in the audience of Stephen Colbert. Hobson's choice much?
Was America protected from the false flag that was 9/11?
Madsen claims a B-52 carrying all three South African nuclear weapons crashed off of the coast of Somalia and they were recovered by Arabs.
Wanna explain how those weapons got on a B-52 in the first place?
Did the aircraft make low level passes over an airfield with South Africans trying to throw the weapons into the bomb-bay, or did the B-52 just hover over the runway?
Maybe the B-52 beamed them up with a transporter beam set on a wide dispersal field.
You don't get it?
There are not now, nor have their ever been, any runways in South Africa large enough to accommodate a B-52.
The US doesn't transport such weapons on B-52s anyway. If there were any truth to the story, a C-130 would have been used.
Madsen isn't even a very good liar, but he sure suckers the gullible.
I am so tired of the media with their constant barrage of politicians body language, simple remarks, or digging up an essay that was written 30 years ago and the public being dumb enough to react to it. The media does not have a journalist among them. They should all be writing for The Enquirer. One little remark or small action and it is all over the news...please!
And Obama went golfing after an american had his throat slit
Which one would you rather have protecting you
I prefer to look at the overall work of a president, (or shadow president, in the case of Cheney until Bush reclaimed his position toward the end), not where they put their feet or how they spend an afternoon (still working and connected, mind you).
As such, I'd say Obama's, so far, been far more successful as a Commander in Chief and strategist. Rather than generating massive wars with casualties, he's used targeted strikes, drones, and diplomacy to great effect, wiping out over and over again key terrorist leaders, preventing any major attacks so far, and even effectively replacing Libya's leadership far more efficiently than happened in Iraq.
Not without its problems, of course, as it's a complicated battlefield upon which we engage, but I've been pleasantly surprised by Obama's handling of terrorism and military engagements.
Madsen claims a B-52 carrying all three South African nuclear weapons crashed off of the coast of Somalia and they were recovered by Arabs.
Wanna explain how those weapons got on a B-52 in the first place?
Did the aircraft make low level passes over an airfield with South Africans trying to throw the weapons into the bomb-bay, or did the B-52 just hover over the runway?
Maybe the B-52 beamed them up with a transporter beam set on a wide dispersal field.
You don't get it?
There are not now, nor have their ever been, any runways in South Africa large enough to accommodate a B-52.
The US doesn't transport such weapons on B-52s anyway. If there were any truth to the story, a C-130 would have been used.
Madsen isn't even a very good liar, but he sure suckers the gullible.
Point to where he wrote that.
You're mistaking runway in South Africa for runway in Diego Garcia. They're several thousand miles away from each other. You're also mistaking B-52 crashed for B-52 jettisoned broken arrows after catching fire.
Those photos were released by the National Archives about a week ago. How can Cheney sit there with his feet up knowing that an official photographer is snapping away?
I prefer to look at the overall work of a president, (or shadow president, in the case of Cheney until Bush reclaimed his position toward the end), not where they put their feet or how they spend an afternoon (still working and connected, mind you).
As such, I'd say Obama's, so far, been far more successful as a Commander in Chief and strategist. Rather than generating massive wars with casualties, he's used targeted strikes, drones, and diplomacy to great effect, wiping out over and over again key terrorist leaders, preventing any major attacks so far, and even effectively replacing Libya's leadership far more efficiently than happened in Iraq.
Not without its problems, of course, as it's a complicated battlefield upon which we engage, but I've been pleasantly surprised by Obama's handling of terrorism and military engagements.
lmao..US led airstrikes just killed hundreds of civilians.
Well, you're the 2nd in command of a country that has just been attacked, and there's not much for you to do yet except let the whole thing unfold. Why wouldn't you try and get as comfortable as you can prior to what will surely be the most trying weeks of your career? I'm as far from a Dubya admin defender as you can get, but I don't see anything wrong. Even if he had a smile on his face, I tell myself jokes in my head to try and laugh during the tough times, why isn't Cheney the same way?
This - even if he was doing it, I doubt there is an deep meaning to it all.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
