Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-23-2015, 05:50 AM
 
Location: zooland 1
3,744 posts, read 4,075,719 times
Reputation: 5531

Advertisements

You were aware one officer has already been cleared from eating marijuana laced edibles right... clean drug test

Now.. onto the other two...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-23-2015, 07:32 AM
 
Location: NJ
23,446 posts, read 17,121,013 times
Reputation: 17479
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadking2003 View Post
Yes, sports fans, it can't get more ridiculous than this. Guilty cops thought they destroyed all the video cameras. But they missed at least one. And since they thought there were no cameras, they thought their destructive activities were private.
-----------------------
SANTA ANA – Three Santa Ana police officers want to quash a surveillance video that shows officers making derogatory comments about a disabled woman and possibly snacking on pot edibles during a recent raid of a medical marijuana dispensary.

A lawsuit, filed last week in Orange County Superior Court by three unidentified police officers and the Santa Ana Police Officers Association, seeks to prevent Santa Ana Police Department internal affairs investigators from using the video as they sort out what happened during the May 26 raid of Sky High Collective.


"We entered a place that we knew to have surveillance equipment. We had no expectation of privacy because of the cameras, so we destroyed the cameras. The place having no cameras meant we had a reasonable expectation of privacy. Because of that, the presence of cameras violated our rights to privacy."

Santa Ana police officers sue to quash video of pot shop raid - The Orange County Register
You are missing the point that the law allows and even encourages such suits. The law and logic are not always compatible.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-23-2015, 05:22 PM
 
Location: Dallas
31,290 posts, read 20,692,854 times
Reputation: 9324
Quote:
Originally Posted by notmeofficer View Post
You were aware one officer has already been cleared from eating marijuana laced edibles right... clean drug test

Now.. onto the other two...
Their behavior is totally unacceptable even if they didn't eat the edibles.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:06 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top