Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I would love for a strong 3rd party to emerge. I believe a strong Libertarian (or heck with the labels, Independent) could take votes from both sides and make for a very interesting race. I doubt I could vote for them, but it would make all candidates get down to the brass tacks of what differentiates them.
cd :O)
Trump / Sanders 2016!!!
No how about a Libertarian and Sanders team up. Maybe they could put aside their interests and win on principals.
Status:
"everybody getting reported now.."
(set 16 days ago)
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,543 posts, read 16,524,552 times
Reputation: 6029
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoomBen
He was reprimanded for not getting in lock step.
Believing the democrats do not do the same is incorrect.
Wasserman Schultz will not tolerate dissention.
That is not a reprimand, the fact that you are even using that word means you dont know its meaning.
if you are going to use a word use it correctly.
And it is not even close to what the person I responded to was claiming, which was that the actual position within the party is challenged by the leadership, which Schumer was not.
You failed on all your attempts. If you didnt know what you were talking about, you should have just not responded.
That is not a reprimand, the fact that you are even using that word means you dont know its meaning.
if you are going to use a word use it correctly.
And it is not even close to what the person I responded to was claiming, which was that the actual position within the party is challenged by the leadership, which Schumer was not.
You failed on all your attempts. If you didnt know what you were talking about, you should have just not responded.
Stop Reprimanding me. I know exactly what it means.
You obviously have no clue what happened with Chucky.
Schumer did not fall in line with his party masters and was reprimanded whether you want t0 believe it or not.
White House press secretary Josh Earnest wouldn't say if Schumer's decision should disqualify him from leading the party in the upper chamber, saying it was a "question for Democratic senators" a day later.
Similar to myself and those I associate with. I am fiscally conservative , not socially. It's a large group, I'm unsure how large however. Im not certain there is any one moniker encompassing that group, either. I suppose looking up a libertarian athiest stat would be the closest to honing in on the numbers , ha.
You don't have to be atheist to oppose extreme social conservatism.
Republicans at this point in history have many problems. A backward stance on most current social issues, such as gay rights and gay marriage. Openly pandering to corporations in the most unapologetic of ways. Illogical, unwavering positions on issues such as gun control and global warming. All these things bother me, but what bothers me most, is the complete lack of intellectual depth of the current Republican party. We no longer see intelligent articulate Republican politicians and commentators like William F Buckley, Barry Goldwater, Dwight Eisenhower and Ronald Reagan. What we see now amongst American conservatives is a willing joy of ignorance, a race to the intellectual bottom.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
