Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-14-2015, 03:52 PM
 
4,660 posts, read 4,120,087 times
Reputation: 9012

Advertisements

Just like to remind everyone that last year ISIL siezed the stockpiles of Saddam's weapons that "didn't exist."

Isis storms Saddam-era chemical weapons complex in Iraq - Telegraph

When this story came out, some of the idiots in the Obama administration told two big whoppers:

A) The munitions captured were too old to be used
B) ISIL would never use them because they are not safe for the users.

Both of these are idiotic lines of reasoning. Some of them are known to be 84% pure, and they are still lethal at at even 43% purity.

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2...pons.html?_r=0

Some quotes from the article.

By 2006, the American military had found dozens of these blister-agent shells in Iraq, and had reports of others circulating on black markets, several techs said. Tests determined that many still contained mustard agent, some at a purity level of 84 percent, officials said.

Separate quote.

Had these results been publicly disclosed, they would have shown that American assertions about Iraq’s chemical weapons posing no militarily significant threat could be misread,

and again, just for context here:

Its canisters had ruptured during the roadside bomb’s detonation, mixing precursors to create sarin with a purity of 43 percent — more than enough to be lethal.

As for the terrorists not using them because they are dangerous to those using them, yeah, becasue its not like terrorrists strap exposives to themselves and blow themselves up or anything.

It was only a matter of time before they started using them, and indeed it is probable that they started using them immediately:

Is ISIS Using Chemical Weapons? - Defense One

Now you are hearing the news media tell new whoppers such as "ISIL may have made mustard gas themselves" and "they may have gotten it from Syria."

Why would they make it themselves or get it from Syria when they already have hundreds of perfectly operational shells from Saddam?

About 5000 rounds of chemical muntions, many perfectly serviceable (1000 found in a Republican guard compound!) were pulled out of Iraq and it is highly suspected that thousands of more made it into Syria, Russia, or were covertly destroyed.

Chemical weapons WERE found in Iraq but Pentagon kept it secret | Daily Mail Online

Saddam also had 500 tons of yellow cake uranium...

500 tons of uranium shipped from Iraq, Pentagon says - CNN.com

...and banned dual use high explosive.

Why didn't we hear about this- the embarrasing fact that THE EUROPEANS manufactured Saddam's WMD. Not Americans, but EUROPEANS. That is also why thy did not want to fight, and lied through their teeth. America only sold precursors which could be used for pesiticdes and other harmless agenst. It was the Europeans who made actual agent and finished shells.

http://fas.org/nuke/guide/iraq/cw/az120103.html


Lest we revive old canards, let us be clear that stockpiles were a declared reason that we went to war in Iraq:

Whereas Iraq, in direct and flagrant violation of the cease-fire, attempted to thwart the efforts of weapons inspectors to identify and destroy Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction stockpiles and development capabilities, which finally resulted in the withdrawal of inspectors from Iraq on October 31, 1998;

This is exactly what Bush was concerned would happen, and if we would not have pulled the troops out under Obama, this would not be happning.

Hillary and Obama lied, Kurds died.

Last edited by cachibatches; 08-14-2015 at 04:58 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-14-2015, 03:58 PM
 
Location: Sugarmill Woods , FL
6,234 posts, read 8,442,558 times
Reputation: 13809
ISIS is just too powerful and to cunning for a little country like the U.S to think they can ever defeat!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-14-2015, 04:08 PM
 
7,578 posts, read 5,325,444 times
Reputation: 9447
Quote:
Originally Posted by cachibatches View Post
Just like to remind everyone that last years ISIL siezed the stockpiles of Saddam's weapons that "didn't exist."
Ah, can I ask who left them there between 2003 to 2009?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-14-2015, 04:13 PM
 
26,492 posts, read 15,070,512 times
Reputation: 14640
Since red lines don't matter, would it be good for Assad to start using WMD's against ISIS?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-14-2015, 04:15 PM
 
26,492 posts, read 15,070,512 times
Reputation: 14640
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheWiseWino View Post
Ah, can I ask who left them there between 2003 to 2009?
The UN. The article apparently says that the UN sealed them up there to determine with other countries how to keep them safe and dispose of them later.

Perhaps someone after January 2009 should have guarded the place a bit better?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-14-2015, 04:15 PM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,381,135 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by cachibatches View Post
Just like to remind everyone that last years ISIL siezed the stockpiles of Saddam's weapons that "didn't exist."

Yet you refrain from reminding everyone that ISIL doesn't exist had we not pursued such a disasterous foreign policy in Iraq, eh?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-14-2015, 04:16 PM
 
4,660 posts, read 4,120,087 times
Reputation: 9012
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheWiseWino View Post
Ah, can I ask who left them there between 2003 to 2009?
Uh, they secured on Bush's watch and captured on Obama's watch. You do know that it was Obama who compeltely abandoned Iraq, pulling all troops out?

It would have been extremely dangerous to our soldiers to dispose of these. Not a probelm as long as troops were present.

This is ENTIRELY Obama's fault. Make no mistake about that.

Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
Yet you refrain from reminding everyone that ISIL doesn't exist had we not pursued such a disasterous foreign policy in Iraq, eh?
See above. There is no deflecting blame from Obama on this. Under his watch Iraq was abandoned.

Quote:
Originally Posted by michiganmoon View Post
I think you are right.

We have to make correct decisions there after Bush, because of Bush and we don't seem to be making them.

Iraq will haunt Bush's legacy and make it harder to elect War Hawk Hillary.
See above.

Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
The Iraqi Army received training and equipment from us and when faced with a fight they ran the other way, they deserve nothing more from the US. We should have learned the folly of attempting to fight for those who won't fight for themselves 50 years ago.
Not the issue. The issue is that now a terrorist organization has access to chemical wepaons because Obama comepltey pulled troops from the region. He knew about these weapons and did not have the sense to keep them secured.

Last edited by cachibatches; 08-14-2015 at 04:27 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-14-2015, 04:20 PM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,381,135 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by cachibatches View Post
Uh, you do know that it was Obama who compeltely abandoned Iraq, pulling all troops out?

It would have been extremely dangerous to our soldiers to dispose of these. Not a probelm as long as troops were present.

This is ENTIRELY Obama's fault. Make no mistake about that.



See above. There is no deflecting blame from Obama on this. Under his watch Iraq was abandoned.
The Iraqi Army received training and equipment from us and when faced with a fight they ran the other way, they deserve nothing more from the US. We should have learned the folly of attempting to fight for those who won't fight for themselves 50 years ago.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-14-2015, 04:21 PM
 
26,492 posts, read 15,070,512 times
Reputation: 14640
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
Yet you refrain from reminding everyone that ISIL doesn't exist had we not pursued such a disasterous foreign policy in Iraq, eh?
I think you are right.

We have to make correct decisions there after Bush, because of Bush and we don't seem to be making them.

Iraq will haunt Bush's legacy and make it harder to elect War Hawk Hillary.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-14-2015, 04:31 PM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,381,135 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by cachibatches View Post
Not the issue. The issue is that now a terrorist organization has access to chemical wepaons because Obama comepltey pulled troops from the region. He knew about these weapons and did not have the sense to keep them secured.
The issue is we won WWII in less time than the span between invading Iraq and Obama taking office. The issue is we never should have been there in the first place and we owed them nothing more.

If we didn't get things under control in that time frame it was never gonna happen.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:42 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top