Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-20-2015, 08:27 PM
 
Location: Buckeye, AZ
38,936 posts, read 23,903,106 times
Reputation: 14125

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bureaucat View Post
Very true. If they feel that their religious convictions prevent them from performing duties required of their office, the ethical option would be to resign.
However I can foersee in some states them running as a single issue candidate for clerk to prevent gay marriages devaluing traditional marriage. That is unless there is an expedited supreme Court case ruling for gay couples and even heterosexual couples harmed by these religious activists on public payrolls voted in by the people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-23-2015, 05:42 PM
 
11,988 posts, read 5,295,922 times
Reputation: 7284
Quote:
Originally Posted by BobNJ1960 View Post
I would vote against any AG defending such laws, as I do not want them wasting taxpayer $. I want them to have common sense.
I agree with you. Here in Kentucky, our current AG refused to defend the state's anti-gay constitutional amendment before the U.S. Supreme Court, saying that (1.) it violated the U.S. Constitution equal protection clause and would it would be a waste of taxpayers money by trying to defend it and (2.) he personally could not morally defend an law that blatantly discriminated against lesbian and gays. After Conway refused to defend Gov. Steve Beshear stepped in and hired an outside firm to defend the law. Why he did so is puzzling to me, since he leaves office at the end of the year, and is pushing 70 so he's heading into the political sunset, so pandering for votes for a future election doesn't make sense.

As for Conway, he took his position despite the fact he was running for Governor this year in an extremely conservative state. The politically expedient, and gutless, approach would to have said that he was personally against the amendment but as the state's attorney he was bound to defend "the will of the people" in court.
He didn't do that. He said that trying to defend it was legally groundless, and he was proven correct.

Now he'll probably get crushed by Matt Bevin in the governor's race in 3 months, in part of his action on the gay marriage issue but he has my admiration for the stance he took.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:20 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top