Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 08-26-2015, 09:04 AM
 
Location: Dallas
31,290 posts, read 20,728,778 times
Reputation: 9325

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by JasonTy View Post
China
Denmark.
Finland.
Netherlands.
Canada.
Sweden.
Norway.
Ireland.

These are socialist countries also
Not even close other than China.

Here, I'll help you;

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_socialist_states
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-26-2015, 09:15 AM
 
Location: Buckeye, AZ
38,936 posts, read 23,880,244 times
Reputation: 14125
Quote:
Originally Posted by JasonTy View Post
China
Denmark.
Finland.
Netherlands.
Canada.
Sweden.
Norway.
Ireland.

These are socialist countries also
China is communist. Most of these other nations have various socialist programs but aren't truly socialist.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2015, 11:31 AM
 
48,502 posts, read 96,816,250 times
Reputation: 18304
Quote:
Originally Posted by theunbrainwashed View Post
I jumped off the Libertarian train wreck around 2010 after realizing that the movement was made up of crooked liars who just wanted to feather nests and full of dupes that believe in slogans. Fast forward to 2015, and the most popular candidate of the GOP is not Rand Paul, it's Trump. Rand has less than 10% poll support, and no matter what gimmicks he tries to pull, he can barely budge. With Trump being so popular, it's clear who the GOP electorate really wants, it's definitely not Libertarian. Thanks to Trump, the Republican voter has rediscovered their love of trade protectionism and what I call "cultural protectionism". Libertarians, real Libertarians, do not believe in protectionism or restricted borders. I was one of the first wave to give the Pauls the finger, and now more people are jumping off that sinking ship called Rand Paul
But even 10% supported candidate can have a effect on national politics as far has discussion and issues. Trump is like to be such a candidate. I always welcome such candidates who bring to forefront discussions other main stream candidates would like to gloss over.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2015, 01:45 PM
 
286 posts, read 382,630 times
Reputation: 168
[quote=lilyflower3191981;40914992]I don't think Libertarians are crooked liars. I think the party is not mature enough and people will never be ready for Libertarians.

Libertarians fail to realize that there has never been--and never will be--a government that functions according to their principles because it runs entirely contrary to human nature.[/quote]


I was a hardcore Libertarian. This, good God, this sentence is hitting the nail on the head so hard it shoots through. Libertarian Ideology isn't flawed it just isn't efficient in this humongous country. It would never work. I still have the upmost respect for Ron Paul though. Bless his soul.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2015, 04:36 PM
 
Location: Santa Monica
36,856 posts, read 17,350,188 times
Reputation: 14459
Well, you can't be anti-state and a statist at the same time. That whole capital "L" libertarianism is just statism from another POV.

A real libertarian is an anarcho-capitalist who believes in no state.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2015, 04:51 PM
 
Location: Madison, WI
5,301 posts, read 2,352,808 times
Reputation: 1229
Quote:
Originally Posted by No_Recess View Post
Well, you can't be anti-state and a statist at the same time. That whole capital "L" libertarianism is just statism from another POV.

A real libertarian is an anarcho-capitalist who believes in no state.
A nicer way of putting it is that an anarcho-capitalist is the only fully consistent type of libertarian
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2015, 04:57 PM
 
Location: Madison, WI
5,301 posts, read 2,352,808 times
Reputation: 1229
[quote=bringamac92;40971024]
Quote:
Originally Posted by lilyflower3191981 View Post
I don't think Libertarians are crooked liars. I think the party is not mature enough and people will never be ready for Libertarians.

Libertarians fail to realize that there has never been--and never will be--a government that functions according to their principles because it runs entirely contrary to human nature.[/quote]


I was a hardcore Libertarian. This, good God, this sentence is hitting the nail on the head so hard it shoots through. Libertarian Ideology isn't flawed it just isn't efficient in this humongous country. It would never work. I still have the upmost respect for Ron Paul though. Bless his soul.
The problem is that the bolded is a logical fallacy. You could argue that the U.S. was originally the first libertarian country, but even if you don't count the U.S., the non-existence of something isn't an argument that it can't exist in the future. There was never a society without slavery either...I'll have to double check but I'm pretty sure there were people back then arguing that we would always have slaves because it's human nature.

Even though I hear it all the time, I still get frustrated when people just assert that libertarianism "just wouldn't work in the real world". Libertarianism is the real world. Politics is trying to "plan" society for the best outcome by threatening people with violence. That's utopian...not leaving everyone alone.

Last edited by T0103E; 08-26-2015 at 05:07 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2015, 05:25 PM
 
79,913 posts, read 44,167,332 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by T0103E View Post

The problem is that the bolded is a logical fallacy. You could argue that the U.S. was originally the first libertarian country, but even if you don't count the U.S., the non-existence of something isn't an argument that it can't exist in the future. There was never a society without slavery either...I'll have to double check but I'm pretty sure there were people back then arguing that we would always have slaves because it's human nature.

Even though I hear it all the time, I still get frustrated when people just assert that libertarianism "just wouldn't work in the real world". Libertarianism is the real world. Politics is trying to "plan" society for the best outcome by threatening people with violence. That's utopian...not leaving everyone alone.
The country was very libertarian in nature when it was first started. Libertarians do not believe that there should be no government. Just that it should be as small as necessary to get by.

When our government has grown itself to the point of feeling up old ladies in a wheelchair trying to board a plane, it's too big.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2015, 06:00 PM
 
Location: *
13,242 posts, read 4,919,895 times
Reputation: 3461
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
The country was very libertarian in nature when it was first started. Libertarians do not believe that there should be no government. Just that it should be as small as necessary to get by.

When our government has grown itself to the point of feeling up old ladies in a wheelchair trying to board a plane, it's too big.
Personally, I prefer to think the earlier designers were creative/pragmatic/flexible anarchists. They refused to be caged in by rigid, limiting, anaesthetic ideologies - after all they were attempting something big & bold & beautiful - however imperfect.

When our government ... the one ostensibly of, by & for the people ... has been reduced to the size where it's being dragged into the bathroom & drowned?

Probably not such a good metaphor? How's this one? Our government on sale to the highest bidder - our people sold down the river.

Sad & pathetic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2015, 06:08 PM
 
79,913 posts, read 44,167,332 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChiGeekGuest View Post
Personally, I prefer to think the earlier designers were creative/pragmatic/flexible anarchists. They refused to be caged in by rigid, limiting, anaesthetic ideologies - after all they were attempting something big & bold & beautiful - however imperfect.
But they put rules in place. Mostly to keep the government at bay but they did set limited parameters for the governments place also.

Quote:
When our government ... the one ostensibly of, by & for the people ... has been reduced to the size where it's being dragged into the bathroom & drowned?

Probably not such a good metaphor? How's this one? Our government on sale to the highest bidder - our people sold down the river.

Sad & pathetic.
I'm not sure why you allow yourself to be bought.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:25 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top