Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 08-29-2015, 02:14 PM
 
3,304 posts, read 2,172,053 times
Reputation: 2390

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by WhipperSnapper 88 View Post
Well if you believe that these were staged events where people DID die, to me, that's even more disturbing than believing they were a hoax where no one really died.

Not to mention how even more unlikely the theory becomes. How does the government convince someone to #1 go kill a bunch of other people, and #2, sacrifice their own life, either by killing themselves or spending the rest of it in a prison cell, just so that the government can implement gun control?
The Gulf of Tonkin Incident, which was used to draw the US into the Vietnam War was a faked event. This is not a conspiracy theory, but a matter of record. The US government lied about being attacked by north Vietnamese gunboats to get support for war. The facts of these lies did not come out until 40 years after the alleged incident, but even when the truth did surface, there was no public outrage. No one cared that our government lied to get us into a brutal war that cost tens of thousands of Americans their lives.

Don't ever assume that our government won't lie for an agenda. They've done it before multiple times.

 
Old 08-29-2015, 11:22 PM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,478,139 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
Originally Posted by Supachai View Post
The Gulf of Tonkin Incident, which was used to draw the US into the Vietnam War was a faked event. This is not a conspiracy theory, but a matter of record. The US government lied about being attacked by north Vietnamese gunboats to get support for war. The facts of these lies did not come out until 40 years after the alleged incident, but even when the truth did surface, there was no public outrage. No one cared that our government lied to get us into a brutal war that cost tens of thousands of Americans their lives.

Don't ever assume that our government won't lie for an agenda. They've done it before multiple times.

uhmm the gulf of tokin was 1964...vietnam started in 1957, escalated in 1961



FDR got us into the vietnam war, by spliting the country in 2, at the Yalta talks


first combat death in vietnam...1957

July 8, 1959 - Two U.S. military advisors, Maj. Dale Buis and Sgt. Chester Ovnand, are killed by Viet Minh guerrillas at Bien Hoa, South Vietnam. They are the first American deaths in the Second Indochina War which Americans will come to know simply as The Vietnam War

May 1961 - President Kennedy sends 4000 American Green Beret 'Special Advisors' to South Vietnam to train South Vietnamese soldiers in methods of 'counter-insurgency' in the fight against Viet Cong guerrillas.

October 1961 - To get a first-hand look at the deteriorating military situation, top Kennedy aides, Maxwell Taylor and Walt Rostow, visit Vietnam. "If Vietnam goes, it will be exceedingly difficult to hold Southeast Asia," Taylor reports to the President and advises Kennedy to expand the number of U.S. military advisors and to send 8000 combat soldiers.

Defense Secretary McNamara and the Joint Chiefs of Staff recommend instead a massive show of force by sending six divisions (200,000 men) to Vietnam.

May 1962 - Defense Secretary McNamara visits South Vietnam and reports "we are winning the war."

July 23, 1962 - The Declaration on the Neutrality of Laos signed in Geneva by the U.S. and 13 other nations, prohibits U.S. invasion of portions of the Ho Chi Minh trail inside eastern Laos.

August 1, 1962 - President Kennedy signs the Foreign Assistance Act of 1962 which provides "...military assistance to countries which are on the rim of the Communist world and under direct attack."

August 1962 - A U.S. Special Forces camp is set up at Khe Sanh to monitor North Vietnamese Army (NVA) infiltration down the Ho Chi Minh trail.


September 2, 1963 - During a TV news interview with Walter Cronkite, President Kennedy Also during the interview, Kennedy comments on America's commitment to Vietnam "If we withdrew from Vietnam, the Communists would control Vietnam. Pretty soon, Thailand, Cambodia, Laos, Malaya, would go..."





1964

July 16-17 - Senator Barry Goldwater is chosen as the Republican nominee for president at the Republican National Convention in San Francisco. During his acceptance speech Goldwater declares, "Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice."

Goldwater is an arch conservative and virulent anti-Communist whose campaign rhetoric will impact coming White House decisions concerning Vietnam. Above all, Johnson's aides do not want the President to appear to be 'soft on Communism' and thus risk losing the November presidential election. But at the same time, they also want the President to avoid being labeled a 'war monger' concerning Vietnam.

July 31, 1964 - In the Gulf of Tonkin, as part of Operation Plan 34A, South Vietnamese commandos in unmarked speed boats raid two North Vietnamese military bases located on islands just off the coast. In the vicinity is the destroyer U.S.S. Maddox.

August 2, 1964 - Three North Vietnamese patrol boats attack the American destroyer U.S.S. Maddox in the Gulf of Tonkin ten miles off the coast of North Vietnam. They fire three torpedoes and machine-guns, but only a single machine-gun round actually strikes the Maddox with no causalities. U.S. Navy fighters from the carrier Ticonderoga, led by Commander James Stockdale, attack the patrol boats, sinking one and damaging the other two.

At the White House, it is Sunday morning (twelve hours behind Vietnam time). President Johnson, reacting cautiously to reports of the incident, decides against retaliation. Instead, he sends a diplomatic message to Hanoi warning of "grave consequences" from any further "unprovoked" attacks. Johnson then orders the Maddox to resume operations in the Gulf of Tonkin in the same vicinity where the attack had occurred. Meanwhile, the Joints Chiefs of Staff put U.S. combat troops on alert and also select targets in North Vietnam for a possible bombing raid, should the need arise.



tonkin had nothing to do with getting us into the war...did it help escalate it,,, sure


By August 1964 the United States was already deeply involved in Vietnam. It is therefore a mischaracterization of history to assert that the Gulf of Tonkin incident caused the United States to enter the Vietnam war. It simply didn’t happen that way.

btw your tonkin post...a lie, that the anti-government conspiracy nuts continue

First, and most importantly, you does not tell that what is referred to as the “Gulf of Tonkin incident” was actually two incidents. There were two alleged attacks on U.S. warships by North Vietnamese patrol boats on two separate occasions in early August 1964. One such attack clearly and definitely occurred. In fact it has been admitted by Vietnamese officials.
Because we know for a fact that one attack definitely occurred, this automatically disqualifies the Gulf of Tonkin incident as being a “false flag.”


What Happened in the Gulf of Tonkin in August 1964?

The United States had been supporting the government of South Vietnam since 1954, when a complicated cease-fire ended France’s war there (much of Southeast Asia had long been a colony of the French). This accord separated Vietnam into two countries, North Vietnam which was Communist, and South Vietnam which was pro-Western. American military and intelligence forces, euphemistically called “advisers,” were in the country beginning in the late 1950s, helping the South Vietnamese resist the civil war going on within its borders to unify all of Vietnam under Communist rule. Inch by inch the United States was being pulled in to a more active role, but by August 1964 there were no U.S. combat troops directly engaged in warfare with the Vietnamese.

On August 2, 1964, the destroyer USS Maddox, cruising in the Gulf of Tonkin on a mission to collect intelligence about North Vietnamese military activity, fell under attack by North Vietnamese patrol boats. The U.S. returned fire and sank one of the boats. Part of the reason this small battle occurred was because North Vietnam claimed a zone of up to twelve miles from its coasts were its territorial waters, and this claim was not recognized by the United States. Historically, there is no question that the August 2 attack did occur. The only question was who in North Vietnam’s military had ordered it and whether they had authority of the government to do so.

In 1998, former Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara—the exact person who a brief clip of appears in Thrive—and other U.S. officials, in an effort to repair relations with Vietnam (which ultimately was unified under Communist rule in 1975), went to Vietnam to talk about the war with officials who had been in command of the North Vietnamese government at that time. These fascinating discussions were recorded and became the basis of a book by Robert S. McNamara, James G. Blight, and Robert K. Bringham called Argument Without End: In Search of Answers to the Vietnam Tragedy (New York: Public Affairs, 1999). On page 203 of this book, McNamara and his opposite numbers from Vietnam discuss the Gulf of Tonkin incident. Here was the record of the exchange about the first attack:
https://thrivedebunked.wordpress.com...acks-debunked/


please go back to school
 
Old 08-30-2015, 02:44 PM
 
Location: East St. Paul 651 forever (or North St. Paul) .
2,860 posts, read 3,386,383 times
Reputation: 1446
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post

please go back to school
We have a far more dubious history than just the Gulf of Tonkin fiasco.

US Government?s Pathological Lies | Veterans Today
 
Old 08-30-2015, 02:49 PM
 
Location: 500 miles from home
33,942 posts, read 22,520,724 times
Reputation: 25816
Quote:
Originally Posted by Don9 View Post
That's what makes Andy Parker so obvious and unbelievable. His daughter was just killed by a crazy black gay man so what does the father do within hours of the killing ... he goes on multiple political shows to discuss changing gun control laws. He has shown absolutely no grief or sorrow for the loss of his daughter. This is exactly what the Sandy Hook parents did and Obama swooped in to use the event to change nation gun laws. Then Obama and the gun grabbers were shocked when congress didn't go along with the charade.

You don't know what you talking about and you come across as just another gun grabbing activist.

I don't own a gun and never have. I'm not a member of the NRA and never plan to be. I believe in America, the American dream and our constitutional rights. I don't like a tyrannical government trying to take away our rights and especially by using contrived events like this.
Your tinfoil hat is on too tight.

Grieving parents often want to try and make 'sense' out of a senseless loss. Take action so that the death of their loved one will not be in vain.

Heard of MADD?
 
Old 08-30-2015, 02:56 PM
 
17,273 posts, read 9,556,326 times
Reputation: 16468
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ringo1 View Post
Your tinfoil hat is on too tight.

Grieving parents often want to try and make 'sense' out of a senseless loss. Take action so that the death of their loved one will not be in vain.

Heard of MADD?
I wouldn't put it past some of these people to be enraged about laws against drinking and driving.
 
Old 08-31-2015, 06:18 AM
 
7,214 posts, read 9,392,923 times
Reputation: 7803
With the NRA-fanboy crowd, it's always "too soon" to talk about any meaningful changes to gun regulation after a multiple-victim shooting. Parents aren't supposed to speak up, because they're "obviously grieving" and it's "too soon". Then the next mass shooting happens, and the cycle repeats.
 
Old 08-31-2015, 06:32 AM
 
5,113 posts, read 5,971,185 times
Reputation: 1748
Quote:
Originally Posted by MaseMan View Post
With the NRA-fanboy crowd, it's always "too soon" to talk about any meaningful changes to gun regulation after a multiple-victim shooting. Parents aren't supposed to speak up, because they're "obviously grieving" and it's "too soon". Then the next mass shooting happens, and the cycle repeats.

Do you really believe that taking away guns from law abiding citizens would stop the thug criminals and gang banger's from killing each other and innocent people?

The problem is that we are becoming a lawless society where police departments are directed to not enforce the existing laws and the criminals are glorified by groups like Black Lives Matters, the Rap industry and political figures like Obama.

One day you might want a gun to protect yourself and family in a violent state of civil unrest ... as we currently see in Europe, Middle East and Africa.
 
Old 08-31-2015, 07:31 AM
 
Location: Greensboro, NC
5,922 posts, read 6,466,965 times
Reputation: 4034
I'm all for the second amendment like any conservative would be. Having said that, it's completely normal for one to be angry and be in a frame of mind to do something to avenge the loss of a murdered loved one. Andy Parker vows to help toughen gun laws. I find that absolutely normal. Some of you tin foil freaks talk about how he was not emotional during the interviews. You think if someone isn't a sniffling bowl of jello then there's something wrong. We all respond to tragedy differently. Parker has experience being in front of the camera. Both as a commercial actor and a politician. Why is it impossible to believe he grieved off camera?

What really is disturbing are the whack jobs who believe this was all staged, calling the shooting fake. Even more so disturbing are those of you who said you don't believe any of this until you personally have ran your hands down the body feeling the wounds. I've read these kind of posts. I've seen the conspiracy websites. Those of you who are in this mentality need a mental health evaluation. For what it's worth, Parker and his family live in my hometown. Everybody knows him as he has been a prominent business owner in the community and has ran for public office. Everybody knew his daughter as well. She was a big contributor in the community and a sweet young lady. Shame on you for dishonoring her (and Adam's) life like this. This was a senseless act. But the conspiracy theories are even more senseless and a sign of some mentally disturbed people.
 
Old 08-31-2015, 07:32 AM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,184,586 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by MaseMan View Post
With the NRA-fanboy crowd, it's always "too soon" to talk about any meaningful changes to gun regulation after a multiple-victim shooting. Parents aren't supposed to speak up, because they're "obviously grieving" and it's "too soon". Then the next mass shooting happens, and the cycle repeats.
What do you do when you get new regulations and the killing doesn't stop?
 
Old 08-31-2015, 07:40 AM
 
Location: In your head, rent free
14,888 posts, read 10,032,416 times
Reputation: 7693
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
What do you do when you get new regulations and the killing doesn't stop?
Call for more "common sense gun regulations" of course, that's what they do every time.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:15 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top