Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-17-2015, 01:05 PM
 
Location: Philadelphia
11,998 posts, read 12,924,934 times
Reputation: 8365

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
And you believe it? Why don't you go and look at how it's calculated these days. It's like the unemployment reporting. Totally bogus.
Exactly. The way these numbers are calculated has always been manipulated, especially UE and inflation.

Sad to see some posters accept lies and distortion without second thought.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-17-2015, 01:07 PM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,471,329 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAtech View Post
Wars were off-bugdet during Bush. That's not true any longer.
oh really


funny you show the fy14 deficit as being under 500 billion.....

LOOK AT THE NUMBERS
10/01/2009................................ 11,920,519,164,319.42
09/30/2010................................ 13,561,623,030,891.79
1,641,103,866,572............................1.6 trillion deficit fy10

10/01/2010.................................13,610,847,58 5,810.09
09/30/2011.................................14,790,340,32 8,557.15
1,179,492,742,747...........................1.17tr illion deficit fy11

09/30/2011................................ 14,790,340,328,557.15
09/28/2012................................ 16,066,241,407,385.89
1,275,901,078,828..........................1.27 trillion deficit fy12

10/01/2012.................................16,159,487,01 3,300.35
09/30/2013.................................16,738,183,52 6,697.32
578,696,513,397..............................578 billion deficit fy13......the only year under one trillion

10/01/2013................................. 16,747,478,675,335.18
09/30/2014................................. 17,824,071,380,733.82
1,076,592,705,398..............................1.0 7 trillion deficit fy14 which just ended back on sept 30

1.6 trillion DEFICIT
1.17 trillion DEFICIT
1.27 trillion DEFICIT
578 Billion DEFICIT (the only year under a trillion since fy09)
1.07 Trillion DEFICIT (this last fy that ended back in sept 30 )



now I will give you that this year(fy15) is currently way down...looking like only 400 billion
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2015, 01:10 PM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,941,962 times
Reputation: 5661
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2e1m5a View Post
Exactly. The way these numbers are calculated has always been manipulated, especially UE and inflation.

Sad to see some posters accept lies and distortion without second thought.
ah yes, the tinfoil hat conspiracy theories. The fact that different methods of calculating inflation yield the same result I guess doesn't shake your theory that the government career civil servants, who have their jobs regardless of party in power, are "cooking the books."

See MIT's Billion Price Index: US Daily Index » The Billion Prices Project @ MIT

What really is sad, is that people like you decide what they want to believe and then build a rationale around it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2015, 01:11 PM
 
13,684 posts, read 9,003,085 times
Reputation: 10405
I just saw where the Federal Reserve did nothing, but keep things the same. Free money!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2015, 01:15 PM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,941,962 times
Reputation: 5661
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
oh really


funny you show the fy14 deficit as being under 500 billion.....

LOOK AT THE NUMBERS
10/01/2009................................ 11,920,519,164,319.42
09/30/2010................................ 13,561,623,030,891.79
1,641,103,866,572............................1.6 trillion deficit fy10

10/01/2010.................................13,610,847,58 5,810.09
09/30/2011.................................14,790,340,32 8,557.15
1,179,492,742,747...........................1.17tr illion deficit fy11

09/30/2011................................ 14,790,340,328,557.15
09/28/2012................................ 16,066,241,407,385.89
1,275,901,078,828..........................1.27 trillion deficit fy12

10/01/2012.................................16,159,487,01 3,300.35
09/30/2013.................................16,738,183,52 6,697.32
578,696,513,397..............................578 billion deficit fy13......the only year under one trillion

10/01/2013................................. 16,747,478,675,335.18
09/30/2014................................. 17,824,071,380,733.82
1,076,592,705,398..............................1.0 7 trillion deficit fy14 which just ended back on sept 30

1.6 trillion DEFICIT
1.17 trillion DEFICIT
1.27 trillion DEFICIT
578 Billion DEFICIT (the only year under a trillion since fy09)
1.07 Trillion DEFICIT (this last fy that ended back in sept 30 )



now I will give you that this year(fy15) is currently way down...looking like only 400 billion
Let's not pretend we are having a serious conversation, because you are not. The deficit is not calculated as the total debt in year Y minus the total debt in year Y-1, because that includes money the government borrows from itself and is booked as a liability on one side and an asset on the other side of the balance sheet.

The deficit is defined as revenue minus expenditures.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2015, 01:17 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,081,664 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by knowledgeiskey View Post
It's the global economy.
But the left will tell us that we dont need to compete on a global economy in regards to debt..

yeah, they never know anything..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2015, 01:19 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,081,664 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAtech View Post
Let's not pretend we are having a serious conversation, because you are not. The deficit is not calculated as the total debt in year Y minus the total debt in year Y-1, because that includes money the government borrows from itself and is booked as a liability on one side and an asset on the other side of the balance sheet.

The deficit is defined as revenue minus expenditures.
So you agree that
1) Clinton did NOT run a surplus
2) And the numbers are cooked, because the "liabilities" for things like Social Security IOU's arent even counted..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2015, 01:21 PM
 
4,571 posts, read 3,518,799 times
Reputation: 3261
Is anyone surprised? The economy is in the chitter in spite of what the o'baggers and statists want you to believe. Inflation is rampant, wages are stagnant, and more people are not working than ever. The 5.1 number is A GREAT BIG LIE, o'baggers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2015, 01:32 PM
 
Location: Philadelphia
11,998 posts, read 12,924,934 times
Reputation: 8365
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAtech View Post
ah yes, the tinfoil hat conspiracy theories. The fact that different methods of calculating inflation yield the same result I guess doesn't shake your theory that the government career civil servants, who have their jobs regardless of party in power, are "cooking the books."

See MIT's Billion Price Index: US Daily Index » The Billion Prices Project @ MIT

What really is sad, is that people like you decide what they want to believe and then build a rationale around it.
LOL-Oh no, criticizing the Government or Federal Reserve about anything? Arrest me! So the way unemployment has been calculated hasn't changed over time? Inflation? You are wrong.

Btw, the tin foil joke is so overplayed it is now incorrect. It doesn't even exist anymore-it is aluminum foil.

I know it's hard to come up with an original joke on your own but if you are going to regurgitate the same joke over and over at least get it right.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2015, 01:42 PM
 
Location: Houston
26,979 posts, read 15,879,874 times
Reputation: 11259
Quote:
Originally Posted by legalsea View Post
I just saw where the Federal Reserve did nothing, but keep things the same. Free money!
Good, I expect my 401K to benefit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:49 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top