What's the replication rate of climate change research? (dollars, vs, 2015)

[knowledgeiskey]

What we oftem forget is that most disciplines have low replication rates. This means that research findings fail to reproduce in subsequent trials. But what about climate change research? Scientists often don't don't do replications out of fear of tarnishing their credibility or career.

[texan2yankee]

Approximately 92% (or 99%) of USHCN surface temperature data consists of estimated values | Watts Up With That?

"An analysis of the U.S. Historical Climatological Network (USHCN) shows that only about 8%-1% (depending on the stage of processing) of the data survives in the climate record as unaltered/estimated data."



Temperature data are calculated from “adjusted” numbers, and are consistently changed to make the past look cooler and the present warmer so that more billions of dollars will flow to people who perpetuate this climate change fraud.

There is no convincing the climate change true believers, however.

[Dbones]

Because of this peer review has replaced the scientific method. They know their "findings" can't be replicated reliably so they use peer review where a bunch of bobble heads with the same goal in mind agree instead. It's a shell game for grants and notoriety.

[Kracer]

peer review vs scientific method.... ???? ????????????????????????????????

[Hyperthetic]

Originally Posted by Kracer

peer review vs scientific method.... ???? ????????????????????????????????

Damned Straight!

From replication, to dupe-lication, to duplicity.

Replicity!

Pass the shigger.