Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-30-2015, 08:49 PM
 
Location: Syracuse, New York
3,121 posts, read 3,098,001 times
Reputation: 2312

Advertisements

Hey, Nirvana conservatives! Whenever the jobs report comes out, you always have a new complaint! So what will it be this time?

Will it be the Labor Force Participation rate? The "seasonal adjustment"? The number of part-time jobs? The number of people who aren't counted as "unemployed"? Will it be too low of an hourly wage increase? Will it be the U3 OR the U6? The number of service sector jobs? The notion that this month's total will be reduced next month? Black unemployment too high?

So get your complaints in early. Since you already know that you'll have a gripe, start now!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-30-2015, 10:40 PM
 
5,717 posts, read 3,148,787 times
Reputation: 7374
Probably just a surge in clock "inventors".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-30-2015, 10:42 PM
 
11,086 posts, read 8,549,057 times
Reputation: 6392
The last 7 years are peak leech.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-30-2015, 10:49 PM
 
34,279 posts, read 19,384,355 times
Reputation: 17261
Most likely that its just more low paying jobs. A completely valid complaint.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-30-2015, 10:54 PM
 
34,279 posts, read 19,384,355 times
Reputation: 17261
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluefly View Post
Though, household income has been rising, albeit slowly, so they can't be that low paying.
LOL, averages or medians? Because the data I see shows median as being flat. So yeah they can be that low paying.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-01-2015, 02:48 AM
 
Location: Pasadena, CA
9,828 posts, read 9,422,622 times
Reputation: 6288
Quote:
Originally Posted by greywar View Post
LOL, averages or medians? Because the data I see shows median as being flat. So yeah they can be that low paying.
If that were the case, the median income would be dropping.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-01-2015, 03:35 AM
 
34,279 posts, read 19,384,355 times
Reputation: 17261
Quote:
Originally Posted by RaymondChandlerLives View Post
If that were the case, the median income would be dropping.
In 2013 the typical family income was $54,462. 2014? 53,657. Thats DROPPING. so right back at you. You literally replied with completely wrong information.

And its also FAR below the peak set in 1999. This is the third year in a row where its stagnated.

Heres a good view of the median income vs GDP for example.

https://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/graph/?graph_id=195323#
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-02-2015, 08:02 AM
 
Location: TN/NC
35,087 posts, read 31,331,023 times
Reputation: 47597
Default Pitiful Sept. jobs report

‘Ugly’ is the word that sums this jobs report - MarketWatch

I think this sentence about sums it up. Not a complete disaster, but lackluster top to bottom.

Everything in this report is weak -- headline, participation, wages, revisions. Real ugly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-02-2015, 08:05 AM
 
23,838 posts, read 23,134,648 times
Reputation: 9409
It's all one big facade. The unemployment rate and associated metrics have been bastardized and politicized to the point that they should never be trusted again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-02-2015, 08:09 AM
 
30,075 posts, read 18,678,343 times
Reputation: 20894
Quote:
Originally Posted by AeroGuyDC View Post
It's all one big facade. The unemployment rate has been bastardized and politicized to the point that it should never be trusted again.

True- with 94 million people out of work and 96 million working, the "unemployment number" is meaningless.

The "slight of hand" in reporting percentages is fudging the denominator, which is done with the unemployment number. Of course, this is done in attempt to decieve and convince the public that things are not so bad.

Obama has presided over-

1. highest number of unemployed citizens in US history

2. record numbers of citizens in poverty

3. record numbers of citizens on foodstamps

4. lowest job participation rate since 1972

5. lowest home ownership

6. highest accumulation of federal and personal debt


Obama has been a disaster for the US. Oddly, libs still love him.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:30 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top