Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-05-2015, 05:35 PM
 
8,104 posts, read 3,959,384 times
Reputation: 3070

Advertisements

If idea of recycling is to reduce waste and increase efficiency 100X quicker, it could be done at the beginning of the line where profits are concerned.

There have been so many products I have bought that are only slightly different so that you can't use the parts from the previous product.

Lets take printers for example.

The only difference between the old brand and newest is a tab on the toner that prevents you from using it on the newer model printer

This gets repeated over and over and translates into a lot of waste and inefficiencies.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-05-2015, 06:24 PM
 
19,718 posts, read 10,121,382 times
Reputation: 13086
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2sleepy View Post
no, actually the private companies who run about 80% of trash hauling services made it illegal.
Actually a law was passed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-05-2015, 07:01 PM
 
Location: Sun City West, Arizona
50,809 posts, read 24,310,427 times
Reputation: 32940
Quote:
Originally Posted by thecoalman View Post
The educated know modern landfills are lined and the leachate treated.
What percent of the population do you think actually knows that? And that was my point. There are an awfully lot of people who just say "go ahead and dump wherever there is space". And, it's not that easy.

What percent of American landfills are actually lined in a relatively fool-proof manner?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-05-2015, 07:01 PM
 
Location: Living rent free in your head
42,850 posts, read 26,268,189 times
Reputation: 34058
Quote:
Originally Posted by momonkey View Post
Private companies don`t pass city ordinances.
I'm sure there are City Ordinances, but in areas where there is no city ordinance landfills generally prohibit removing any discarded items- do you disagree with that?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-05-2015, 07:02 PM
 
Location: Living rent free in your head
42,850 posts, read 26,268,189 times
Reputation: 34058
Quote:
Originally Posted by Floorist View Post
Actually a law was passed.
A state law? If so do you know what the law is, I have heard of City Ordinances but never a state law
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-05-2015, 07:11 PM
 
3,304 posts, read 2,172,400 times
Reputation: 2390
People recycle because it assuages the guilt they feel about the destruction their modern consumerist lifestyle causes to the world. That's the only reason.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-05-2015, 07:12 PM
 
Location: Free From The Oppressive State
30,253 posts, read 23,733,496 times
Reputation: 38634
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spartacus713 View Post
You can start with the article in the OP (from the New York Times). Here is the link again, so you don't have to look for it:

Recycling is still costly and inefficient. Why do we continue to do it?
An opinion piece is not facts. If you or anyone else is going to convince me that recycling is actually harmful for the environment, then you need to provide FACTS, not someone's opinion.

I got a link from another poster, and most of that is not convincing. There is one point made that I am going to look further in to, that may very well prove convincing, but I'm going to make sure that I get unbiased/no agenda driven "facts" before I agree to anything. The piece did have a link, and that link is rather impressive with what they discovered, but it's one source, and who knows what the full story is.

Opinion pieces are not facts, and should never be used as "evidence" that something is or isn't.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-05-2015, 07:17 PM
 
Location: On the Chesapeake
45,379 posts, read 60,561,367 times
Reputation: 60996
The Washington Post had an article a couple months ago which was not an opinion piece:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local...y.html?hpid=z3
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-06-2015, 09:10 AM
 
Location: Maryland about 20 miles NW of DC
6,104 posts, read 5,990,126 times
Reputation: 2479
Quote:
Originally Posted by momonkey View Post
Private companies don`t pass city ordinances.
But when the companies pull the strings on their puppets in city or county government they will dance to what ever tune the companies want.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-05-2016, 11:56 PM
 
130 posts, read 148,466 times
Reputation: 53
Even if its expensive, somehow it help protect our environment, preventing some environmental issue that our earth is suffering now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:18 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top