Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-22-2015, 09:07 AM
 
Location: Chesapeake Bay
6,046 posts, read 4,818,446 times
Reputation: 3544

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by LetsRock View Post
Hillary takes responsiblity for Bengazi and admits she delegated the security to others. Sorry Hillary, you can delegate authority, but not responsibility. Case closed. You are not quaified for any office.
Why wouldn't she delegate the security? You aren't making any sense at all.

 
Old 10-22-2015, 09:08 AM
 
Location: Central Maine
4,697 posts, read 6,449,100 times
Reputation: 5047
Quote:
Originally Posted by JAMS14 View Post
And there you have it folks, typical righty answer.

Tell us, how many more pretend investigations will you need? Until one finally gives you the answers you decided beforehand that you want? Or until after the 2016 elections? Either answer will satisfy you, even if neither have anything to do with the truth. NINE investigations and you still have nothing. Political theater at its finest...
I thought this was interesting:

Attached Thumbnails
TREY GOWDY: We' re Breaking New Ground (on Benghazi)-investigations-03-816x438a.jpg  
 
Old 10-22-2015, 09:09 AM
 
Location: Londonderry, NH
41,479 posts, read 59,791,864 times
Reputation: 24863
I hope the Republicans are "breaking mew ground" in order to dig a hole and bury this partisan persecution.

I blame local security for not properly evacuating or protecting the Embassy.
 
Old 10-22-2015, 09:11 AM
 
Location: Tampa, FL
27,798 posts, read 32,448,899 times
Reputation: 14611
if you think Clinton competently handled the situation and didn't stonewall or cover up, then go ahead and vote for her.....I've never trusted her and won't be voting for her no matter who she's up against in 2016.
 
Old 10-22-2015, 09:12 AM
 
Location: Chesapeake Bay
6,046 posts, read 4,818,446 times
Reputation: 3544
Quote:
Originally Posted by LetsRock View Post


Ignoring a request for more security is the same as DENYING the request. You can't vote "present" when lives are on the line.
Who ignored a request for more security? Additional security was offered to Amb Stevens by Gen Ham (senior American military officer in that region) twice, he turned it down both times.
 
Old 10-22-2015, 09:15 AM
 
Location: 500 miles from home
33,942 posts, read 22,532,112 times
Reputation: 25816
Quote:
Originally Posted by BucFan View Post
That was their opinion, not Gowdy's. Uninformed opinions don't count in my book.
Well, since two of them were on the committee - how are their opinions 'uninformed'?

Gowdy's OWN opinion is heavily biased, no?
 
Old 10-22-2015, 09:16 AM
 
4,067 posts, read 2,274,211 times
Reputation: 4384
Quote:
Originally Posted by JAMS14 View Post
And there you have it folks, typical righty answer.

Tell us, how many more pretend investigations will you need? Until one finally gives you the answers you decided beforehand that you want? Or until after the 2016 elections? Either answer will satisfy you, even if neither have anything to do with the truth. NINE investigations and you still have nothing. Political theater at its finest...
If there was nothing to hide then why weren't all of Hillary's and emails relating to Benghazi not released until this hearing. Why is that???

Anything thinking she isn't hiding something is beyond naïve at this point!
 
Old 10-22-2015, 09:19 AM
 
Location: United States
12,390 posts, read 7,098,861 times
Reputation: 6135
I'm sure the Dems have plenty inside information into these investigations, so the fact that Biden is not running, is a clear indicator that nothing is going to come from this, or the email investigation.

I would bet that the elite that are backing Hilary to the tune of billions of dollars, have told those doing these investigations, to not find anything (if there is anything to find).
 
Old 10-22-2015, 09:21 AM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,488,320 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
Originally Posted by SandraMoore66 View Post
If there was nothing to hide then why weren't all of Hillary's and emails relating to Benghazi not released until this hearing. Why is that???

Anything thinking she isn't hiding something is beyond naïve at this point!
even better yet...why was there over 700 emails in 2011...but the year of the THREE attacks (to include the 9/11 attack) there was only 68 emails


700 emails the year before saying how dangerous the area was

but only 68 emails during the year (2012) when there are 3 attacks




as usual the liberals lie through their teeth
 
Old 10-22-2015, 09:22 AM
 
11,181 posts, read 10,534,651 times
Reputation: 18618
She made toast out of Congresswoman Susan Brook's visual aids.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:22 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top