Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I dont want to she that woman anywhere near the white house but I have to say that the republicans should focus on actually getting a candiate to defeat her instead of this benghazi nonsense that 98% of america gives 2 cents about.
Today was an absolutely remarkable display of endurance from Hillary Clinton and a resounding victory for Democrats.
Sitting in a chair for 11 hours in front of the Benghazi Committee, being interrogated on a plethora of questions, and sometimes yelled at, from committee members, at the age of 67 years old, she remained calm, collected, articulate and dignified. She faithfully answered all of the questions regarding the event that occurred in Benghazi in 2012.
For 11 hours, Republicans embarked on a witch hunt, asking detailed questions, hoping to find that "gotcha" moment that would make Hillary look bad and possibly be prosecuted.
It didn't happen.
This Benghazi Committee is perhaps the biggest political sham in American history and wasted $4.8 million dollars of taxpayer money and 11 hours of time, quite frankly, to try to damage Hillary's presidential campaign.
This is not the outcome that Republicans were hoping for, and if anything, I fully expect her poll numbers to surge in the coming days. The Republican agenda, in this regard, will actually HELP her, if anything.
It also further illustrates that Republicans are a national embarrassment, are immature, and it exposes who they really are and their real intentions: to bring down Hillary Clinton, because they KNOW THAT SHE'S GOING TO BE THE NEXT PRESIDENT!!!
Congratulations Hillary. Today, you displayed many strong attributes that a strong president should be equipped with.
What, oh what, will Republicans do now???
this is from a liberal that wants the Denmark model for the U.S.A praising Hillary.
Memo to you, Hillary is not a "PROGRESSIVE LIBERAL" that you paint her to be.....she is a WAR HAWK, Pro Defense and PRO Wall Street like the Republican Establishment in Washington.
and by the way, everything in Washington in POLITICAL.....Watergate was political....the Iran Contra hearings was political......the Clarence Thomas hearing was all political by the Democrats and they spent a lot more than 5 million dollars......but when Democrats do it, its their jobs, right? hypocrites!
Fact is 4 Americans are dead!!!! 600 requests for more security were ignored. Hillary and the Obama administration lied to the American people and Hillary's response is it wasn't her job.....nobody got demoted and nobody got fired......and then the liberal media praises her......what a joke!
I hear Hillary did great in the last hearing but that does not mean that she is not guilty of any wrongdoing. It could simply show that she is the best of the best when it comes to politicians, calm, collective, and a pro at lying and distorting the truth. With that said, I personally don't know if she is guilty or not guilty of any wrongdoing. Neither does anyone on this forum. We probably only know 10% of what actually happened and the details surrounding the different circumstances concerning Benghazi and the emails.
this is from a liberal that wants the Denmark model for the U.S.A praising Hillary.
Memo to you, Hillary is not a "PROGRESSIVE LIBERAL" that you paint her to be.....she is a WAR HAWK, Pro Defense and PRO Wall Street like the Republican Establishment in Washington.
and by the way, everything in Washington in POLITICAL.....Watergate was political....the Iran Contra hearings was political......the Clarence Thomas hearing was all political by the Democrats and they spent a lot more than 5 million dollars......but when Democrats do it, its their jobs, right? hypocrites!
Fact is 4 Americans are dead!!!! 600 requests for more security were ignored. Hillary and the Obama administration lied to the American people and Hillary's response is it wasn't her job.....nobody got demoted and nobody got fired......and then the liberal media praises her......what a joke!
But why target Hillary only?!? Under the Bush administration, 60 ambassadors were killed, and NOTHING was done to investigate it or whatever. But now that FOUR guys are dead under Hillary's watch, it's a HUGE deal, right?!
But why target Hillary only?!? Under the Bush administration, 60 ambassadors were killed, and NOTHING was done to investigate it or whatever. But now that FOUR guys are dead under Hillary's watch, it's a HUGE deal, right?!
did those 60 ambassadors requested 600 times more security and were ignored???? and when they were killed did the Bush WH and Secretary of State lied to the public for political motives 2 months before an election?
did that happened under Bush????? funny, the democrats had control of congress in 2006, if Bush did that they would have had hearings.
did those 60 ambassadors requested 600 times more security and were ignored???? and when they were killed did the Bush WH and Secretary of State lied to the public for political motives 2 months before an election?
did that happened under Bush????? funny, the democrats had control of congress in 2006, if Bush did that they would have had hearings.
try again!!!
Hillary was NOT responsible for security requests or any security provisions. It was NOT her job.
Hillary was NOT responsible for security requests or any security provisions. It was NOT her job.
she is Secretary of State and she didn't read the 600 requests for more security by the ambassador?????
is not her job???? what is her job as Secretary of State, to chase down the Chinese against their will into a hotel room and don't let them leave until they sign an agreement????.....but ignore the 600 security requests by an ambassador that reported to her????
and her job is also lying to the American people going along with Obama for the reasons for the attacks for political motives 2 months before an election????? is that her job?
it shows she was incompetent at her job and a liar.
she is Secretary of State and she didn't read the 600 requests for more security by the ambassador?????
is not her job???? what is her job as Secretary of State, to chase down the Chinese against their will into a hotel room and don't let them leave until they sign an agreement????.....but ignore the 600 security requests by an ambassador that reported to her????
and her job is also lying to the American people going along with Obama for the reasons for the attacks for political motives 2 months before an election????? is that her job?
it shows she was incompetent at her job and a liar.
If that's how you want to see it, fine.
But if you actually read the transcript from the hearing yesterday, she clearly states that that was not her responsibility. Security was supposed to be handled by other people, not her.
And for crying out loud, EVERYONE occasionally makes mistakes on a job, including your savior Ronald Reagan.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
