Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-16-2015, 09:40 AM
 
Location: Sun City West, Arizona
51,067 posts, read 24,563,121 times
Reputation: 33100

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by PullMyFinger View Post
I believe in God or a higher power and we are a part of a plan that is beyond our understanding. But no, I did not evolve from apes. Absolutely ridiculous notion.
Evolution does not say that man evolved from apes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-16-2015, 09:43 AM
 
Location: Sun City West, Arizona
51,067 posts, read 24,563,121 times
Reputation: 33100
Quote:
Originally Posted by GregW View Post
Some preacher figured out the world was 6,000 or so years old from biblical genealogy. He was wrong.

60,000 years is about 3,000 generations and that is plenty of time for humans or anything else to adopt to different and or changing environmental conditions by natural selection.
It was Archbishop Usher who decided that the earth was created on 22 October 4004 BC. What a dunce.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-16-2015, 09:48 AM
 
19,750 posts, read 10,186,696 times
Reputation: 13127
Just a question and I do not know the answer. Why do so many Mexicans look like they have Oriental features? I thought Mexicans were descendants of Spanish and Natives.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-16-2015, 11:40 AM
 
3,978 posts, read 4,591,404 times
Reputation: 2243
Quote:
Originally Posted by Floorist View Post
Just a question and I do not know the answer. Why do so many Mexicans look like they have Oriental features? I thought Mexicans were descendants of Spanish and Natives.
Natives came from Asia 12,000 years ago. I thought this is basic knowledge.

By the way, it's considered offensive by many to use the word "Oriental" to describe people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-16-2015, 11:44 AM
 
19,750 posts, read 10,186,696 times
Reputation: 13127
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quaker15 View Post
Natives came from Asia 12,000 years ago. I thought this is basic knowledge.

By the way, it's considered offensive by many to use the word "Oriental" to describe people.
But the Native Americans still in North America don't have Asian features like those in Mexico. Neither do the ones in South America and yet they are supposed to have common ancestors from those who crossed Beringia.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-16-2015, 11:52 AM
 
7,580 posts, read 5,348,906 times
Reputation: 9450
Quote:
Originally Posted by Floorist View Post
But the Native Americans still in North America don't have Asian features like those in Mexico. Neither do the ones in South America and yet they are supposed to have common ancestors from those who crossed Beringia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geneti...f_the_Americas
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-16-2015, 11:52 AM
 
4,288 posts, read 2,067,706 times
Reputation: 2815
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quaker15 View Post
According to science, Homo Sapiens left Africa about 100,000 years ago. And, Europeans and Asians are separated only about 60,000 years ago.

Is 100,000 years really long enough for people to evolve so differently to get the result of Africans and whites? Is 60,000 years really long for people to be so different as the whites and Asians? Do you think other "humans" were inter-mixed with them to create these differences?
I don't think the differences between any of the groups is that great.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-16-2015, 12:03 PM
 
19,750 posts, read 10,186,696 times
Reputation: 13127
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheWiseWino View Post
Thanks. That answers it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-16-2015, 01:09 PM
 
3,304 posts, read 2,178,068 times
Reputation: 2390
Quote:
Originally Posted by knowledgeiskey View Post

I think that archaic Y DNA finding was retracted after it didn't account for the mutation rate. It's just an earlier variant of haplogroup E.
There hasn't been any retraction. I know that another study disputes the findings. The author of the original study, Michael Hammer, is one of the leaders in the field of human genetics. The author of the critique,
Eran Elhaik, has publicly taken issue with idea of introgression by other hominids into the human genome. He seems to believe in a literal Adam and Eve and has stated doozies like this in response to the first study:

“In fact, their hypothesis creates a sort of space-time paradox whereby the most ancient individual belonging to Homo sapiens species has not yet been born. If we take the numerical results from previous studies seriously we can conclude that the past may be altered by the mother of Adam deciding not to conceive him in the future, thus, bringing a retroactive end to our species.”
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-16-2015, 01:14 PM
 
6,940 posts, read 9,700,190 times
Reputation: 3153
Quote:
Originally Posted by Supachai View Post
There hasn't been any retraction. I know that another study disputes the findings. The author of the original study, Michael Hammer, is one of the leaders in the field of human genetics. The author of the critique,
Eran Elhaik, has publicly taken issue with idea of introgression by other hominids into the human genome. He seems to believe in a literal Adam and Eve and has stated doozies like this in response to the first study:

“In fact, their hypothesis creates a sort of space-time paradox whereby the most ancient individual belonging to Homo sapiens species has not yet been born. If we take the numerical results from previous studies seriously we can conclude that the past may be altered by the mother of Adam deciding not to conceive him in the future, thus, bringing a retroactive end to our species.”

We still have a lot to find out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top