Quote:
Originally Posted by FreshFresh
Would you be ok if the person reporting your news was previously a porn star? How about if they become a TV personality like a Erin Andrews? Would you be ok with that? What if they over-saturate the networks?
|
I guess it is not as big a sin to be a
wh ore who has had sex with multiple people on film for money, as a real sportscaster/prognosticator as someone like say, Jimmy The Greek. He committed the unforgivable sin of having an opinion on something (which may or may not be true) that was considered not PC, and his career was ruined as a result.
Similar to what the liberals tried to do to Howard Cossell.
Needless to say if you were to poll (D's) vs. (R's), the (D's) would be more forgiving of hookers, w hores, and former prisoners than anyone who might be an expert, but said the wrong words or had the wrong thoughts.
The thought police of the leftists are very strong at the moment, so flash over substance is the new norm. That of course is evident if you were to look at the resumes of Obama vs. the people he won election over. But I digress.
So if former w hores will draw more of a young male audience than real sports journalists or players, then by all means have those who represent the degradation of America as part of your daily reports on sports.
I for one will never watch a channel who does such a thing, but who knows if decent people watching TV makes a difference anymore.
'